This study addresses the timely problem of painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD), the most common cause of orofacial pain second only to tooth pain. Findings from previous studies suggest that dysregulation of connectivity within specific brain circuits is part of chronic pain pathophysiology. This study will identify connectivity patterns within those brain circuits as potential signatures for pain- related disability in chronic TMD pain participants. New knowledge regarding these brain connectivity patterns is expected to be significant because it will support improved phenotyping of this heterogeneous participant population. It is also expected that this finding can potentially be extrapolated to other chronic pain conditions, such as back pain, migraine headache, and fibromyalgia that are frequently comorbid conditions in chronic TMD participants.
Evidence of dysregulation of brain circuits in chronic pain in general and in chronic temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain specifically is well documented. Among putative brain circuits involved in chronic pain pathophysiology are thalamocortical brain pathways, which transmit nociceptive signals centrally from peripheral tissues. Pathways between the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the periaqueductal gray (PAG) are considered part of an antinociceptive brain circuit, since they are necessary to engage endogenous pain modulation. Dysfunction of endogenous pain modulation has been systematically reported in chronic pain patients, and a meta-analysis of clinical studies of TMD patients done by the Principal investigator and others showed increased pain facilitation and impaired pain inhibition in patients relative to pain-free controls. Endogenous pain modulation can be assessed by psychophysical methods. For instance, pain facilitation can be assessed with temporal summation of pain (TSP) using brief noxious stimuli presented repeatedly over peripheral tissues at \>0.3 Hz. Pain inhibition can be assessed with conditioned pain modulation (CPM) by presenting noxious stimuli over a body site during concurrent noxious stimuli elsewhere to induce pain inhibition. Neuroimaging studies in pain-free controls showed that functional connectivity within thalamocortical and antinociceptive brain circuits are related to increased TSP and reduced CPM responses, respectively. It is unknown if connectivity patterns within the thalamocortical and antinociceptive brain circuits are altered in chronic TMD patients, reflecting endogenous pain modulation dysfunction. Corticolimbic pathways connecting the mPFC, amygdala and nucleus accumbens are thought to play a key role in chronic pain and specifically, in emotion-driven modulation of nociceptive signals. Recently a longitudinal study showed that functional and structural connectivity patterns determined from neuroimaging data between these regions predict transition from acute to chronic back pain. A population study of TMD pain patients showed that approximately 64% of these patients also present with comorbid low back pain, thus it is possible that chronic TMD pain patients may display brain connectivity patterns that are similar to those identified in persistent back pain patients. Functional brain connectivity is usually assessed from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), where participants lay at rest during fMRI scans to measure intrinsic functional connectivity (FC). Connectivity patterns within the thalamocortical, corticolimbic and antinociceptive circuits described above were determined using this traditional approach for FC assessment. Recent studies departed from this traditional approach and assessed FC during presentation of noxious stimuli during fMRI data acquisition and identified evoked FC changes. These studies' results suggest that noxious stimuli affect connectivity patterns in brain circuits involved in pain processing in pain-free participants and in fibromyalgia patients. Thus, it is reasonable that psychophysical testing for pain facilitation (e.g., TSP) and pain inhibition (e.g., CPM) could reflect changes in connectivity patterns within brain circuits associated with pain modulation. If confirmed, these evoked connectivity patterns identified from engaging endogenous pain modulation could serve as a "signature" for pain modulation in individuals, similar to a "functional connectome fingerprinting" demonstrated to predict fluid intelligence in healthy participants using data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP). Taken together these results suggest new approaches to investigate dysregulation of brain circuits in chronic TMD pain with a focus on brain connectivity, that can serve as unique chronic pain "signatures" related to endogenous pain modulation function. There is a critical need to determine the potential of brain circuits' connectivity patterns to serve as signatures for pain- related disability. Addressing this critical need will provide novel ways to identify subgroups of chronic TMD pain patients who respond poorly to treatment. Closing this gap in our knowledge has reasonable potential to provide the opportunity for development of precise and valid brain imaging methods supporting refined phenotyping of chronic TMD pain patients leading to early identification of patients with poor prognosis. Chronic pain causes suffering to more Americans than heart disease, diabetes and cancer combined, and TMD is the second most commonly occurring musculoskeletal condition resulting in pain and disability after chronic back pain. TMD affects approximately 5-12% of the population, with annual estimates of economic impact ranging between $4 billion per the NIDCR and $32 billion according to a study sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality . Pain-related disability significantly impacts patient's quality of life, and a subgroup of chronic TMD pain patients present with high pain-related disability, as identified by the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS), and these patients have poor prognoses - even with treatment - and greater health care costs. About half to two-thirds of individuals with TMD seek treatment, and of those approximately 15% will develop chronic pain. Chronic TMD pain patients present with pain persisting ≥6 months, and it is well accepted that chronic TMD pain pathophysiology includes dysregulation of brain circuits. Recent evidence suggests that brain functional and anatomical characteristics, namely connectivity patterns within specific brain circuits, are related to processing, modulation and persistence of pain. Brain connectivity patterns within the thalamocortical circuit are associated with expression of endogenous pain facilitation, while connectivity patterns between prefrontal cortex and brainstem nuclei, an antinociceptive circuit, are related to endogenous pain inhibition. In addition, brain connectivity patterns within corticolimbic pathways involved in the emotion-driven modulation of nociceptive signals predict transition from acute to chronic back pain. These connectivity patterns within thalamocortical, antinociceptive, and corticolimbic brain circuits have not been described in chronic TMD patients, and it is unknown if connectivity patterns within these brain circuits can distinguish chronic TMD patients based on pain-related disability.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
95
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
RECRUITINGFunctional connectivity (FC) for the thalamocortical brain circuit
Multi-modal MRI data will be used to assess functional connectivity patterns within the thalamocortical brain circuit in chronic TMD pain participants and pain free controls. Functional connectivity will be reported as a unitless value. Neuroimaging will be conducted during Visit 3.
Time frame: 2.5 hours
Functional connectivity (FC) for the antinociceptive brain circuit
Multi-modal MRI data will be used to assess functional connectivity patterns within the antinociceptive brain circuit in chronic TMD pain participants and pain free controls. Functional connectivity will be reported as a unitless value. Neuroimaging will be conducted during Visit 3.
Time frame: 2.5 hours
Functional connectivity (FC) for the corticolimbic brain circuit
Multi-modal MRI data will be used to assess functional connectivity patterns within the corticolimbic brain circuit in chronic TMD pain participants and pain free controls. Functional connectivity will be reported as a unitless value. Neuroimaging will be conducted during Visit 3.
Time frame: 2.5 hours
Anatomical connectivity (AC) for the thalamocortical brain circuit
Multi-modal MRI data will be used to assess anatomical connectivity patterns within the thalamocortical brain circuit in chronic TMD pain participants and pain free controls. Anatomical connectivity will be reported as a unitless value. Neuroimaging will be conducted during Visit 3.
Time frame: 2.5 hours
Anatomical connectivity (AC) for the antinociceptive brain circuit
Multi-modal MRI data will be used to assess anatomical connectivity patterns within the antinociceptive brain circuit in chronic TMD pain participants and pain free controls. Anatomical connectivity will be reported as a unitless value. Neuroimaging will be conducted during Visit 3.
Time frame: 2.5 hours
Change in anatomical connectivity of corticolimbic brain circuit
Multi-modal MRI data will be used to assess anatomical connectivity patterns within the corticolimbic brain circuit in chronic TMD pain participants and pain free controls. Anatomical connectivity will be reported as a unitless value. Neuroimaging will be conducted during Visit 3.
Time frame: 2.5 hours
Temporal Summation of Pain (TSP) and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) responses
To assess correlations between functional connectivity and anatomical connectivity matrices and individual endogenous pain modulation responses, TSP and CPM testing will be conducted. TSP testing uses a thermal device and custom pressure algometers to deliver a single stimulus perceived as "slightly painful" by the participant, followed by 5- or 10-stimuli series repeated at 1 Hz. CPM testing uses a pressure algometer as test stimulus to deliver increasing pressure (50kPa/s rate) to the test site until the participant presses a switch signaling when the pressure sensation first becomes painful. The conditioning stimulus (CS) used to elicit pain inhibition for CPM testing is tonic noxious contact heat applied to the non-dominant volar forearm. CPM testing is also done in triplicate on two occasions: at baseline and during CS applied to the forearm. TSP and CPM responses will be assessed during Visit 2 of the study and reported as percentage values.
Time frame: 3.5 hours
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.