ART (Autologous Regeneration of Tissue) is a revolutionary technology for harvesting skin without the drawbacks of conventional grafting. This innovative system allows the clinician to collect hundreds of microcolumns of full-thickness skin tissue and apply them directly to the wound site. It can all be done in an outpatient setting with minimized donor site concerns.
Millions of Americans suffer from acute and hard-to-heal chronic wounds. The National Institutes of Health estimates that 3% of the U.S. population over the age of 65 has an open wound. As the population ages in concert with an increased incidence of diabetes and obesity, the problem will intensify. A recent article suggests that the financial burden of wound care is approaching 100 billion dollars. Despite the gravity of the problem and the number of patients afflicted, open wounds can take weeks, months or even years to heal. The search for interventions that promote healing, reduce suffering and enhance quality of life continues as does the need to address the underlying issues that disrupt the wound healing process. Countless hours are spent treating chronic wounds (diabetic ulcers, venous ulcers, pressure injuries). Called the "silent epidemic," chronic wounds often result in infection, disability and sometimes amputation. Crafting a treatment plan that addresses the individual needs of each wound and each patient, hinges on managing the underlying issues that can disrupt healing and increase healthcare costs. Innovation in wound bed preparation and tissue regeneration bring new hope for these patients in the form of more effective wound closure, improved quality of life and reduced costs. Autologous skin grafting is the gold standard for covering areas of skin loss.4 However, traditional grafting is limited by accessibility issues and donor site complications-pain, risk of infection, scarring. ART (Autologous Regeneration of Tissue) is a revolutionary technology for harvesting skin without the drawbacks of conventional grafting. This innovative system allows the clinician to collect hundreds of microcolumns of full-thickness skin tissue and apply them directly to the wound site. It can all be done in an outpatient setting with minimized donor site concerns.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
20
The ART Skin Harvesting System is intended to harvest full thickness skin microcolumns in a minimally invasive manner and scatter them at the recipient site. It consists of three components: (1) a non-sterile, reusable handheld device; (2) a sterile, single-patient use needle cartridge containing the needle array for harvesting skin micrografts from the patient donor site; and (3) a sterile, disposable handheld protective sleeve to cover the handheld device (figure 1). The sterile sleeve reduces contamination of the reusable handheld device and provides a sterile barrier between the non-sterile handheld device and the patient.
SerenaGroup - Monroeville
Monroeville, Pennsylvania, United States
To evaluate wound closure
Evaluating Wound Closure with Surface area through measurments
Time frame: 4 weeks
Group A (Healthy Volunteers): The number of successful full thickness micrograft harvests from calf, thigh, and lower back as a percentage of the maximal possible grafts.
Group A (Healthy Volunteers): The number of successful full thickness micrograft harvests from calf, thigh, and lower back as a percentage of the maximal possible grafts.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Group B (Chronic Wound patients): The number of wounds achieving a percentage area reduction (PAR) of 40% or greater in 4 weeks.
Group B (Chronic Wound patients): The number of wounds achieving a percentage area reduction (PAR) of 40% or greater in 4 weeks.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Proportion of patients that achieve complete wound closure
Proportion of patients that achieve complete wound closure by week 4. (Group B Only)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Time to initial wound closure within 4 weeks (Kaplan-Meier approach).
Time to initial wound closure within 4 weeks (Kaplan-Meier approach). (Group B only)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Difference in pain between baseline
Difference in pain between baseline and week 4 using a numeric scale 1-10. (Group B Only)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Number of Treatments used per patient.
Number of Treatments used per patient. (Group B Only)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 4 weeks
• Incidence of adverse events (calculated as total and mean number per patient).
• Incidence of adverse events (calculated as total and mean number per patient). (Group B Only)
Time frame: 4 weeks