This research project aims to examine the impact of motor coordination deficits and the effects of motor intervention on preschool-aged children's perceived competence, health-related physical fitness, activity participation and physical activity. Eighty children, aged 4-6 years,with or without motor coordination deficits will be recruited and assigned to to motor intervention (DCD-t), control 1 (DCD-c) or control 2 (TD) group. Children in the intervention group will receive motor intervention for 12 weeks. All children will be assessed at baseline, 0-, 3- and 6-month post-intervention.
This research project aims to examine the impact of motor coordination deficits on preschool-aged children's perceived competence, health-related physical fitness, activity participation and physical activity. Furthermore, the investigators are to investigate the effects of motor intervention on children's competence and participation during preschool age. This study plans to recruit 40 children with motor coordination deficits, aged 4-6 years, and 40 age- and gender-matched typically developing children. Children with motor coordination deficits will further be randomly assigned to motor intervention (DCD-t) or control (DCD-c) group. At baseline assessment, all children will be assessed for motor coordination competence, self-perception of competence, health-related physical fitness and daily activity participation. Physical activity will also be quantitatively measured using accelerometry. During the intervention phase, children in the DCD-t group will receive task-oriented motor intervention combined with fitness training three times per week while children in the DCD-c group remain usual activities. All children will be re-assessed at 0-, 3- and 6-month post-intervention. Repeated Measures ANOVA will be applied to examine the differences of motor competence, self-perception, fitness and activity participation among the 3 groups of children and over the 9-month period. The effects of motor intervention on DCD children's competence and participation will also be examined.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
gross motor skill intervention combined with fitness training
Fooyin University
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
motor coordination competence- post
percentile scores of Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition; score range 1\~99, a higher score indicates a better outcome
Time frame: 3 months
motor coordination competence- follow1
percentile scores of Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition; score range 1\~99, a higher score indicates a better outcome
Time frame: 6 months
motor coordination competence- follow2
percentile scores of Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition; score range 1\~99, a higher score indicates a better outcome
Time frame: 9 months
weight- post
body weight (kg)
Time frame: 3 months
weight- follow1
body weight (kg)
Time frame: 6 months
weight- follow2
body weight (kg)
Time frame: 9 months
height- post
body height (m)
Time frame: 3 months
height- follow1
body height (m)
Time frame: 6 months
height- follow2
body height (m)
Time frame: 9 months
flexibility- post
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
SINGLE
Enrollment
80
sit-and-reach (cm)
Time frame: 3 months
flexibility- follow1
sit-and-reach (cm)
Time frame: 6 months
flexibility- follow2
sit-and-reach (cm)
Time frame: 9 months
strength- post
long jump (cm)
Time frame: 3 months
strength- follow1
long jump (cm)
Time frame: 6 months
strength- follow2
long jump (cm)
Time frame: 9 months
aerobic fitness- post
10 meter shuttle walk test (lap)
Time frame: 3 months
aerobic fitness- follow1
10 meter shuttle walk test (lap)
Time frame: 6 months
aerobic fitness- follow2
10 meter shuttle walk test (lap)
Time frame: 9 months
self-perceived motor competence- post
scores of Physical Competence Subscale of the The Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children; score range 6\~24, a higher score indicates a better outcome
Time frame: 3 months
self-perceived motor competence- follow1
scores of Physical Competence Subscale of the The Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children; score range 6\~24, a higher score indicates a better outcome
Time frame: 6 months
self-perceived motor competence- follow2
scores of Physical Competence Subscale of the The Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children; score range 6\~24, a higher score indicates a better outcome
Time frame: 9 months
daily time spent in physical activities- post
7-day averaged time spent in physical activities, recorded by activity monitor (minutes per day)
Time frame: 3 months
daily time spent in physical activities- follow1
7-day averaged time spent in physical activities, recorded by activity monitor (minutes per day)
Time frame: 6 months
daily time spent in physical activities- follow2
7-day averaged time spent in physical activities, recorded by activity monitor (minutes per day)
Time frame: 9 months