Study GO43104 is a Phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter study of lurbinectedin in combination with atezolizumab compared with atezolizumab alone administered as maintenance therapy in participants with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) after first-line induction therapy with carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab. The study consists of 2 phases: an induction phase and a maintenance phase. Participants need to have an ongoing response or stable disease per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) v1.1 criteria after completion of 4 cycles of carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab induction treatment in order to be considered for eligibility screening for the maintenance phase. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either lurbinectedin plus atezolizumab or atezolizumab in the maintenance phase.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
660
Atezolizumab will be administered intravenously at a fixed dose of 1200 mg on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles in the induction phase. Atezolizumab will be administered intravenously at a fixed dose of 1200 mg on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in the maintenance phase.
Lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m² will be administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in the maintenance phase.
Carboplatin will be administered according to the standard of care treatment for 4 cycles in the induction phase.
Etoposide will be administered according to the standard of care treatment for 4 cycles in the induction phase.
Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers, a Service of WellStar Cobb Hospital
Marietta, Georgia, United States
Illinois Cancer Care
Peoria, Illinois, United States
New England Cancer Specialists
Scarborough, Maine, United States
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Cancer & Hematology Centers of Western Michigan
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Randomized Phase: Independent Review Facility (IRF) - Assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented PD as determined by the IRF according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimetres (mm).
Time frame: Up to 26 months
Randomized Phase: Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death from any cause.
Time frame: Up to 26 months
Randomized Phase: Investigator-assessed PFS
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented PD as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time frame: Up to 26 months
Randomized Phase: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Determined by the IRF
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with an objective tumor response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by the IRF using RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Up to 26 months
Randomized Phase: Confirmed ORR as Determined by the Investigator
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with an objective tumor response of CR or PR as determined by the investigator using RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD.
Time frame: Up to 26 months
Randomized Phase: Duration of Response (DOR) as Determined by the IRF
DOR was calculated for participants who had a best confirmed OR of CR/PR. DOR= time from first occurrence of a documented OR until the time of documented PD as determined by IRF assessment using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR=disappearance of all target and non-target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR= at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time frame: Up to 26 months
Randomized Phase: DOR as Determined by the Investigator
DOR was calculated for participants who had a best confirmed OR of CR/PR. DOR= time from first occurrence of a documented OR until the time of documented PD as determined by investigator using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. CR=disappearance of all target and non-target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR= at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time frame: Up to 26 months
Randomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS as Determined by the IRF at 6 Months and 12 Months
PFS rate at 6 months and 12 months was defined as the percentage of participants who had not experienced PD as determined by the IRF according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause at 6 months and 12 months after randomization. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Months 6 and 12
Randomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS Determined by Investigator at 6 Months and 12 Months
PFS rate at 6 months and 12 months was defined as the percentage of participants who had not experienced PD as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause at 6 months and 12 months after randomization. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Months 6 and 12
Randomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With OS at 12 Months and 24 Months
OS rate at 12 months and 24 months was defined as the percentage of participants who had not experienced death from any cause at 12 months and 24 months after randomization. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Months 12 and 24
Randomized Phase: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
An AE =any unfavorable \& unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory values/abnormal clinical test results), symptoms/disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether considered related to the pharmaceutical product. SAE=any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect that is fatal or life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is medically significant or requires intervention to prevent one or other of the outcomes listed above. AESI= drug induced liver injury, suspected transmission of infectious agent via study treatment, hepatitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, hypersensitivity, etc. AESIs may include events not specified in the protocol.
Time frame: Up to 26 months
Randomized Phase: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Atezolizumab
For determining post-baseline incidence, participants were considered to be ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed at least one positive post-baseline ADA result during the randomized phase, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of 1 or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units (t.u.) greater than the baseline titer result.
Time frame: Up to 26 months
Randomized Phase: Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) in Physical Functioning (PF) and Global Health Status (GHS) as Measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQC30)
EORTC QLQ-C30=30 questions assessing 5 aspects of participant functioning(physical,emotional,role,cognitive \&social),3 symptom scales,GHS/QoL \& 6 single items.PF scale=5 questions about participants PF \& daily activities(strenuous activities,long walks,short walks,bed/chair rest \& needing help with eating,dressing,washing themselves/using the toilet).PF scale scored on 4-point scale(1=Not at All-4=Very Much).GHS/QoL scored on 7-point scale(1=Very Poor- 7=Excellent).Scores were linearly transformed to a range of 0-100,higher scores=higher response level \& better QoL.TTCD for PF \& GHS/QoL=time from the date of randomization until first confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration,which is decrease from baseline in PF/GHS score that must be held for at least 2 consecutive assessments/initial decrease above baseline followed by death attributable to cancer progression within 6 weeks of the last deteriorated assessment.Score change≥10-point change in subscale score,considered meaningful.
Time frame: Up to 26 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Clinical Research Alliance
Westbury, New York, United States
The Mark H. Zangmeister Ctr
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Hollings Cancer Center
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Greco-Hainesworth Centers for Research
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
...and 83 more locations