Radioembolization (RE) is a minimally invasive treatment with administration of radioactive microspheres into the hepatic artery via a microcatheter. Since tumors are preferentially supplied by the hepatic artery, most microspheres get trapped in the tumor. RE has been shown a feasible and safe procedure for the treatment of unresectable CRC liver metastases. These data compare favourably with the toxicity data of capecitabine plus bevacizumab, but this should be validated in a prospective study. The proposed study investigates the efficacy of RE as an alternative, better tolerated and more cost-effective treatment option in elderly or frail patients compared to chronic systemic treatment with comparable progression-free survival.
Rationale In The Netherlands, ±14.000 people/year are diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC), and 50% of patients already have/will develop distant metastases, most commonly to the liver. Standard treatment is palliative systemic treatment, which prolongs overall survival (OS). In only a small subset of patients with liver-only metastases, local treatment (i.e. surgery) of metastases is possible with curative intent, either initially or after downsizing by intensive systemic treatment. The average age at CRC diagnosis is 69 yrs, and 30% of CRC patients are ≥75 yrs. Thus, many patients are too old and/or fragile to allow intensive systemic regimens or major surgery. In frail/elderly patients the standard treatment is capecitabine plus an antibody against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, i.e. bevacizumab or biosimilar), given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, resulting in a median progression free survival (PFS) of 8.5-9.2 months. Capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome and diarrhoea are the most commonly occurring toxicities. Prolonged exposure to CTCAE grade 2 toxicity in frail or elderly patients may already significantly impact quality of life and daily functioning. Therefore, treatments with less toxicity would be of great value for these patients. Radioembolization (RE) is a minimally invasive treatment with administration of radioactive microspheres into the hepatic artery via a microcatheter. Since tumors are preferentially supplied by the hepatic artery, most microspheres get trapped in the tumor. RE has been shown a feasible and safe procedure for the treatment of unresectable CRC liver metastases. These data compare favourably with the toxicity data of capecitabine plus bevacizumab, but this should be validated in a prospective study. The proposed study investigates the efficacy of RE as an alternative, better tolerated and more cost-effective treatment option in elderly or frail patients compared to chronic systemic treatment with comparable progression-free survival. Objectives: Primary objective: The objective of this randomized phase 2 study is to demonstrate efficacy of a single RE in terms of PFS in CRC patients with liver-only metastases who are candidates for palliative systemic treatment with capecitabine plus anti-VEGF antibody (bevacizumab or biosimilar). Secondary objectives: * To evaluate safety/toxicity. * To evaluate cost-effectiveness. * To evaluate quality of life (QoL). * To evaluate overall survival. Study design: Multi-center, interventional, treatment, randomized phase 2, open label, comparative study. The study will be conducted within the network of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG). Patients will be randomized 1:1 between RE and systemic treatment with capecitabine + anti-VEGF antibody. Study population: 220 elderly and/or fragile patients with liver-limited, unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, previously not systemically treated, who are candidates for systemic treatment with capecitabine plus an anti-VEGF antibody, will be enrolled in this study. Given the lack of validated selection criteria for elderly and/or frail this judgement will be left to the discretion of the local investigator. Intervention: Individualized holmium-166 radioembolization (166Ho-RE) will be performed via a catheter during angiography. Dosimetry-based treatment planning will be individualized using Q-Suite™ software. The comparator, standard systemic treatment, will be given by the local investigator and will consist of capecitabine orally 1000 mg/m2 bid day 1-14 + anti-VEGF antibody i.v. 7.5 mg/kg day 1 at 3-weekly cycles, continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary endpoint: Progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints: * Safety/toxicity. * Cost-effectiveness. * QoL. * Overall survival.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
220
holmium-166 microspheres
Capecitabine plus anti-VEGF antibody
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, Netherlands
RECRUITINGprogression-free survival
Time frame: 4 years
Adverse event frequency and grade according to CTCAE version 5.0
Time frame: 3.5 years
Quality of life (EORTC quality of life questionnaire number C30)
For all questionnaires the official manuals will be used to calculate the subscales.
Time frame: 3.5 years
Quality of life (EORTC quality of life questionnaire number CR29)
For all questionnaires the official manuals will be used to calculate the subscales.
Time frame: 3.5 years
Quality of life (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory: MFI-20)
For all questionnaires the official manuals will be used to calculate the subscales.
Time frame: 3.5 years
Overall survival
Time frame: 5 years
Cost-effectiveness: Medical Consumption Questionnaire (MCQ)
For all questionnaires the official manuals will be used to calculate the subscales.
Time frame: 4 years
Cost-effectiveness: Productivity Cost Questionnaire (PCQ)
For all questionnaires the official manuals will be used to calculate the subscales.
Time frame: 4 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.