Subjects are to be enrolled in this clinical study if they are 18 - 55 years old. Up to 120 subjects will be enrolled at multiple study centers. Subjects may receive up to 5 treatments for a wide array of dermatologic conditions in which electrocoagulation and hemostasis is a viable mechanism for means of improvement.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
79
Subjects are treated with the Potenza™ device if they present with conditions such as, but not limited to: wrinkles, fine lines, crepey skin, acne scars, active acne, enlarged pores, stretch marks, or loose skin on the face, neck and/or body.
Center for Dermatology and Laser Surgery
Sacramento, California, United States
Maryland Dermatology Laser, Skin, & Vein Institute, LLC.
Hunt Valley, Maryland, United States
Cynosure
Westford, Massachusetts, United States
McDaniel Institute of Anti-Aging Research
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
Subject Satisfaction
Subjects were asked to grade their satisfaction with the results of the treatment as either extremely dissatisfied, dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, slightly satisfied, satisfied, or extremely satisfied.
Time frame: 30 day follow up
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Assessment (GAIS) Assessment
The Clinical Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (CGAIS) ranging from "worse" to "very much improved" is be used to judge the improvement as seen by the treating Investigator. The Investigator compared the baseline (pre-treatment) photographs to the follow up photographs to determine if the follow up image looks worse, if there is no change, if there is improvement, if there is much improvement, or if there is very much improvement in the follow up image when compared to the baseline image.
Time frame: 30 day follow up
Subject Satisfaction
Subjects were asked to grade their satisfaction with the results of the treatment as either extremely dissatisfied, dissatisfied, slightly dissatisfied, slightly satisfied, satisfied, or extremely satisfied.
Time frame: 90 day follow up
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Assessment (GAIS) Assessment
The Clinical Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (CGAIS) ranging from "worse" to "very much improved" is be used to judge the improvement as seen by the treating Investigator. The Investigator compared the baseline (pre-treatment) photographs to the follow up photographs to determine if the follow up image looks worse, if there is no change, if there is improvement, if there is much improvement, or if there is very much improvement in the follow up image when compared to the baseline image.
Time frame: 90 day follow up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.