The goal of this study is to conduct a prospective, longitudinal assessment of the natural clinical progression of Angelman syndrome (AS) in children and adults. This will be performed by acquiring baseline measurements, and developing effective outcome measures and diagnostic tools for the syndrome, to prepare the healthcare system for forthcoming clinical trials.
This study is being conducted in anticipation of several candidate therapies which are approaching clinical readiness for Angelman syndrome. This study will comprehensively evaluate the natural clinical progression of the disease using scales and questionnaires for the assessment of motor function and global development, motor measuring devices (ActiMyo), and by collecting sleep and seizure diaries. In addition, proteomic analysis and electroencephalography (EEG) recordings will be collected to identify biomarkers which will indicate improvements in disease outcome following treatment.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
40
Longitudinal assessment of disease progression of Angelman syndrome in patients
University of Oxford
Oxford, OXON, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGCollection of relevant medical data (retrospective and prospective)
Collection of demographic data, Angelman Syndrome-related medical history, past medical and surgical history, current medication, history of immunisations and family medical history.
Time frame: 2 years 1 month
Neurological assessment scale
Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) (0-2 years ONLY). Maximum global score of 78. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of neurological performance.
Time frame: 2 years 1 month
Clinical Scale
Clinical Global Impressions Scale - Angelman Syndrome version (CGI-SAS). Scales whereby practitioner rates from 1 to 7 the overall improvement/deterioration of the participant affected by Angelman Syndrome. One is improved and 7 denotes deterioration.
Time frame: 2 years 1 month
Clinical Scale
Caregiver-reported Angelman Syndrome Scale (CASS). Scales whereby the carer rates from 1 to 7 the overall improvement/deterioration of the participant affected to by Angelman Syndrome. One is improved and 7 denotes deterioration.
Time frame: 2 years 1 month
Movement monitoring using wearable device
Continuous movement monitoring using actimetry ActiMyo® in uncontrolled environment (i.e., home)
Time frame: 2 years 1 month
Gross motor milestones
World Health Organisation (WHO) Motor Milestones. Scale of 6 gross motor milestones. Lower scores denotes worse motor function.
Time frame: 2 years 1 month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Global development assessment scale
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - 4 (BSID-4) for Developmental delays. Scale is divided into five domains, which are further divided into subdomains. The first step is to calculate the starting point by beginning with the items that are age appropriate. The starting point is validated if three consecutive items are achieved. If the participant affected by Angelman Syndrome does not achieve three consecutive items in a row at the age-appropriated starting point, the evaluator must go backwards to the lower age-starting point until the participant affected by Angelman Syndrome achieves three items in a row. The assessment stops once five items in a row are not achieved.
Time frame: 2 years 1 month
Global development assessment scale
Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales-III (VABS-III). Scale composed of two main domains, which are subdivided into several subdomains. Lower score indicates worse cognitive functioning.
Time frame: 2 years 1 month
Aberrant behaviour assessment
Aberrant Behaviour Checklist-Community (ABC-C). This scale comprises 58 items and is divided into five subdomains. The ABC-C is designed on a four-point scale with the lowest score representing less-affected patients while the highest score represents the severest patients.
Time frame: 2 years 1 month
Communication assessment
Observed Reported Communication Assessment (ORCA) Tool. Questionnaire designed to be completed by the patients' main carer and records patient communication.
Time frame: 2 years 1 month
Motor function assessment
Functional Mobility Scale (FMS). Scale which rates the walking ability in three different walking distances, and these distances will be rated on a 6-point scale.
Time frame: 2 years 1 month
Sleep and seizure activity
Sleep and seizure diaries with ready-made questionnaires
Time frame: 2 years 1 month
Laboratory biomarkers for Angelman syndrome
Proteomic analysis of plasma samples to determine biomarkers of disease progression
Time frame: 2 years 1 month
Electroencephalogram (EEG) activity recordings
Electroencephalogram (EEG) to record brain activity of Angelman Syndrome patients over a 24-hour period (e.g., sleep architecture, number and frequency of seizures, background epileptic activity, delta-rhythmicity)
Time frame: 24 hours
Quality of Life questionnaires for families of Angelman syndrome patients
PedsQL-Family Module questionnaires. Questionnaire uses ranking system of 1-4 based on frequency.
Time frame: 2 years 1 month
Quality of life assessment for individuals affected by Angelman syndrome
PedsQL-Core Module questionnaires. Questionnaire uses ranking system which depends on the age of patient.
Time frame: 2 years 1 month
Health economics
Interview with Carer's
Time frame: 2 years and 1 month
Clinical trial readiness
Demographic data collection and facilities preparation
Time frame: 2 years and 1 month