Sensory Versus Motor Level Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare31 enrolled

Overview

Dysphagia is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality in stroke survivors. Electrical stimulation is often included as part of the treatment plan for dysphagia, and can be applied at a sensory or motor level intensity. However, evidence to support these different modes of stimulation is lacking. This study compared the effectiveness of sensory and motor level stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia.

Objective: Dysphagia is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality in stroke survivors. Electrical stimulation is often included as part of the treatment plan for dysphagia, and can be applied at a sensory or motor level intensity. However, evidence to support sensory versus motor stimulation is lacking. This study compares the effect of sensory and motor stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia. Design: Randomized controlled trial Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation facility. Participants: Participants (50-75 years of age) who had dysphagia caused by a stroke within 6 months prior to enrollment were included. Participants were excluded if they had a contraindication for electrical stimulation, previous stroke, psychiatric disorder, contraindications for MBS, or pre-stroke swallowing disorders. Interventions: Each patient received ten, 45-minute anterior neck sensory or motor level electrical stimulation sessions in addition to standard speech therapy. Motor stimulation was administered as a stimulus intensity sufficient to produce muscle contractions. Sensory stimulation was defined as the threshold when the patient feels a tingling sensation on their skin (approximately 4-5mA). Main Outcome Measures: Swallow FIM, National Outcome Measurement System (NOMS), Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale (DOSS), and change in modified diet.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

QUADRUPLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Stroke, Ischemic

Interventions

Neuromuscular electrical stimulationDEVICE

Motor stimulation was administered at an intensity sufficient to produce muscle contractions. Sensory stimulation was defined as the threshold when the patient feels a tingling sensation on their skin.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 80 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * 18-80 * acute ischemic CVA within the first month and confirmed by MRI. * Diagnosis of dysphagia will be obtained by bedside swallowing exam and MBS/FEES studies. Exclusion Criteria: * patients who have contraindications for electrical stimulation (malignancy, DVT/thrombophlebitis, hemorrhagic conditions, pregnancy, pacemaker or other electrical hardware) * known premorbid swallowing disorders * GERD * dementia or psychiatric disorder * bilateral cerebral involvement * contraindications for FEES/MBS (infectious disease such as HIV, HCV, HBV, nasal obstruction, decompensated heart disease, risk of bleeding such as active ulcers, allergy to contrast).

Locations (1)

Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare

Pomona, California, United States

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Swallow Functional Assessment Measure

7 point swallow scale the Functional oral intake scale (FOIS) lowest score = 1; highest = 7.

Time frame: up to 2 months

Change in Dysphagia outcome Severity Scale

seven-point functional outcome scale designed to assess dysphagia severity on the MBSS, lowest score = 1; highest = 7.

Time frame: up to 2 months

Secondary Outcomes

Change in PenAsp

Evaluates the depth response and clearance of material entering into the airway, lowest score = 8; highest =1.

Time frame: up to 2 months

Change in Swal-Qol

93-item outcome tool 24 was used to determine impact on quality-of-life and quality-of-care. Each item has a 5 point likert scale.

Time frame: up to 3 months

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.