The study is a phase 2 non-randomized, open-label, multi-cohort, multi-center study assessing the clinical benefit of SAR444245 (THOR-707) combined with other anticancer therapies for the treatment of participants aged 18 years and older with advanced and metastatic gastrointestinal cancer. This study is structured as a master protocol for the investigation of SAR444245 with other anticancer therapies. Sub study 01 - Cohort A aims to establish proof-of-concept that combining the non-alpha-IL2 SAR444245 with the anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab will result in a significant increase in the percentage of patients experiencing an objective response in the setting of advanced unresectable or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Sub study 02 - Cohort B1, B2 and B3 would focus on non MSI-H tumors with a large unmet need to establish proof-of-concept that combining the non-alpha-IL2 SAR444245 with the anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab will result in a significant increase in the percentage of patients experiencing an objective response in the setting of advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJ), especially with low PD-L1 expression or after progression on prior PD1/PD-L1-based regimens. Sub study 03 - Cohort C aims to establish proof-of-concept that combining the non-alpha-IL2 SAR444245 with the anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab will result in a significant increase in the percentage of patients experiencing an objective response in participants with advanced unresectable or metastatic HCC who relapsed on prior PD1/PD-L1-based regimens. Sub study 04 - Cohort D1 and D2 aims to establish proof-of-concept that combining the non-alpha-IL2 SAR444245 with either the anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab or with the anti-EGFR IgG1 antibody cetuximab will result in a significant increase in the percentage of patients experiencing an objective response in the setting of advanced unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
The duration of the study for an individual patient will start from the signature of the main informed consent and include a screening period of up to 28 days, a treatment period \[max 35 cycles {cohort A; B1,B2, B3, C and D1} = 735 days or until PD {cohort D2}\], an end-of-treatment visit at least 30 days following the last administration of study drug (or until the patient receives another anticancer therapy, whichever is earlier), and a follow-up visit 3 months after treatment discontinuation and every 3 months following, until disease progression, or initiation of another antitumor treatment, or death, whichever is earlier.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
138
Solution for infusion: intravenous infusion
Solution for infusion: intravenous infusion
Solution for infusion: intravenous infusion
City of Hope Site Number : 8400007
Duarte, California, United States
AdventHealth Orlando Site Number : 8400005
Orlando, Florida, United States
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Site Number : 8400009
Seattle, Washington, United States
Investigational Site Number : 0560002
Brussels, Belgium
Investigational Site Number : 0560003
Edegem, Belgium
Cohort A: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) with reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeter (mm) (\<1 centimeter \[cm\]). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to maximum exposure of study treatment; approximately 8 months
Cohorts B1, B2 and B3: Objective Response Rate
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a confirmed CR or PR as per RECIST v 1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) with reduction in short axis to \<10 mm (\<1 cm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to maximum exposure of study treatment; approximately 25 months
Cohort C: Objective Response Rate
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a confirmed CR or PR as per RECIST v 1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) with reduction in short axis to \<10 mm (\<1 cm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to maximum exposure of study treatment; approximately 20 months
Cohorts D1 and D2: Objective Response Rate
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a confirmed CR or PR as per RECIST v 1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) with reduction in short axis to \<10 mm (\<1 cm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to maximum exposure of study treatment; approximately 8 months
All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An SAE was any AE that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened (according to the Investigator's opinion) or became serious during the TE period.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose of study treatment administration, up to approximately 9 months (Cohorts A, D1 and D2), 26 months (Cohorts B1, B2 and B3) and 21 months (Cohort C)
All Cohorts: Time to Response (TTR)
TTR was defined as the time from the date of first study treatment administration to the first tumor assessment at which the overall response was recorded as PR or CR that was subsequently confirmed as per RECIST v 1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) with reduction in short axis to \<10 mm (\<1 cm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to maximum exposure of study treatment; approximately 8 months (Cohort A, D1 and D2), 25 months (Cohort B1, B2 and B3), 20 months (Cohort C)
All Cohorts: Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR was defined as the time from the date of first tumor assessment at which the overall response was recorded as CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed to the date of first documentation of objective PD before the initiation of any post-treatment anti-cancer therapy or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, as per RECIST v 1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) with reduction in short axis to \<10 mm (\<1 cm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must have also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm (0.5 cm).
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Investigational Site Number : 0560001
Leuven, Belgium
Investigational Site Number : 1520001
Santiago, Reg Metropolitana de Santiago, Chile
Investigational Site Number : 1560002
Wuhan, China
Investigational Site Number : 2500004
Bordeaux, France
Investigational Site Number : 2500006
Brest, France
...and 19 more locations
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to maximum exposure of study treatment; approximately 8 months (Cohort A, D1 and D2), 25 months (Cohort B1, B2 and B3), 20 months (Cohort C)
All Cohorts: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with clinical benefit (confirmed CR or PR as best overall response \[BOR\], or SD lasting at least 6 months), as per RECIST v 1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) with reduction in short axis to \<10 mm (\<1 cm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of the study treatment until disease progression/recurrence (taking as reference for PD the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started). SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to maximum exposure of study treatment; approximately 8 months (Cohort A, D1 and D2), 25 months (Cohort B1, B2 and B3), 20 months (Cohort C)
All Cohorts: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from the date of first study treatment to the date of the first documentation of objective PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, as per RECIST v 1.1. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must have also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm (0.5 cm).
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to maximum exposure of study treatment; approximately 8 months (Cohort A, D1 and D2), 25 months (Cohort B1, B2 and B3), 20 months (Cohort C)
Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) of Pegenzileukin
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of Cmax of pegenzileukin. The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using non-compartmental method.
Time frame: Day 1 Cycle 1 and Day 1 Cycle 4 (each cycle is 21 days)
Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) of Pegenzileukin
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of Clast of pegenzileukin. The PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental method.
Time frame: Day 1 Cycle 1 and Day 1 Cycle 4 (each cycle is 21 days)
Time of the Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Tlast) of Pegenzileukin
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of tlast of pegenzileukin. The PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental method.
Time frame: Day 1 Cycle 1 and Day 1 Cycle 4 (each cycle is 21 days)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Calculated Using the Trapezoidal Method From Time Zero to Tlast (AUClast) of Pegenzileukin
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of AUClast of pegenzileukin. The PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental method.
Time frame: Day 1 Cycle 1 and Day 1 Cycle 4 (each cycle is 21 days)
Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC) of Pegenzileukin
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of AUC of pegenzileukin. The PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental method.
Time frame: Day 1 Cycle 1 and Day 1 Cycle 4 (each cycle is 21 days)
Observed Accumulation Ratio (Rac) of Pegenzileukin
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of Rac of pegenzileukin. Rac was calculated as AUC at Cycle 4 Day 1/AUC at Cycle 1 Day 1. The PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental method.
Time frame: Day 1 Cycle 1 and Day 1 Cycle 4 (each cycle is 21 days)
Observed Accumulation Ratio Based on Cmax (Rac,Cmax) of Pegenzileukin
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of Rac,cmax of pegenzileukin. Rac,cmax was calculated as Cmax at Cycle 4 Day 1/Cmax at Cycle 1 Day 1. The PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental method.
Time frame: Day 1 Cycle 1 and Day 1 Cycle 4 (each cycle is 21 days)
Cohort D2: Concentration Observed Just Before Intervention Administration During Repeated Dosing (Ctrough) of Cetuximab
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of Ctrough of Cetuximab. The PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental method.
Time frame: Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 (each cycle is 21 days)
Cohort D2: Concentration at End of Infusion (Ceoi) of Cetuximab
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of Ceoi of Cetuximab. The PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental method.
Time frame: Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 (each cycle is 21 days)
All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) Against Pegenzileukin
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to assess the presence of ADA against pegenzileukin. Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as at least one treatment-induced or treatment-boosted ADA. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed during the TE period and without pre-existing ADA (including participants without pre-treatment samples). Treatment-boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADA that was boosted during the TE period to a significant higher titer than the baseline. Number of participants with treatment-emergent ADA is presented.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to 30 days post last dose of study treatment administration, up to approximately 9 months (Cohorts A, D1 and D2), 26 months (Cohorts B1, B2 and B3) and 21 months (Cohort C)