To evaluate whether stringent follow-up consisting of combined laboratory and ultrasound surveillance is superior to clinical monitoring alone to maintain clinical remission in rheumatoid arthritis.
Randomized, controlled, parallel-group, multi-centre study in which patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological/targeted synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD) in mono- or combination therapy with conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) in a stable dosage and interval for ≥6 months with low disease activity or remission will receive an power Doppler musculoskeletal ultrasound examination (PDUS) and monitoring of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels at baseline and several timepoints within a 24 month study period (primary endpoint) and within a 48 month long-term extension. At baseline, b/tsDMARD medication will be withdrawn in all patients, who will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio in an "Assisted monitoring" (arm A) or a "Clinical monitoring" (arm B) arm respectively. Further stratification for remission vs. low disease activity and mono- vs combination therapy will be implemented in the randomisation process. In arm A, CRP and PDUS information will be made available to the clinical assessors who, at each time-point will use this information along with that from clinical examination, to identify patients experiencing recurrence of inflammation which will then be counted as subclinical flare according to predefined criteria. In arm B the results of CRP and PDUS will be recorded but will not be made available to the clinical assessor who will have to identify clinical flares according to predefined criteria based on information from the clinical examination only.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
85
The biological/targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug will be discontinued in both arms at baseline
Proportion of subjects without a clinical flare until week 24
Proportion of subjects without a clinical flare
Time frame: week 24
Proportion of subjects without a clinical flare
Proportion of subjects without a clinical flare
Time frame: week 48
Time to clinical flare (days)
Time to clinical flare (days)
Time frame: study period
28 swollen joint count
28 swollen joint count, scale 0 (best) - 28 (worse)
Time frame: week 24
28 tender joint count
28 tender joint count, scale 0 (best) - 28 (worse)
Time frame: week 24
Proportion of subjects with a clinical flare in the assisted monitoring arm vs. clinical monitoring arm, the latter stratified according to b/tsDMARD reinitiation
Proportion of subjects with a clinical flare in the assisted monitoring arm vs. clinical monitoring arm, the latter stratified according to b/tsDMARD reinitiation
Time frame: week 24
Proportion of patients in low disease activity or remission based on simplified disease activity index
Proportion of patients in low disease activity or remission based on simplified disease activity index
Time frame: week 24
Proportion of patients in low disease activity or remission based on simplified disease activity index
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Proportion of patients in low disease activity or remission based on simplified disease activity index
Time frame: week 48
Patient's global assessment
Patient's global assessment, scale 0 (best) - 100 (worst)
Time frame: week 24
Evaluator's global assessment
Evaluator's global assessment, scale 0 (best) - 100 (worst)
Time frame: week 24
C-reactive protein
C-reactive protein, scale 0 (best) - infinite (worst)
Time frame: week 24
Radiographic progression
change in Sharp Van der Heijde score, scale 0 (best) - 488 (worse)
Time frame: at week 48 weeks from baseline
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, scale 0 (best) - 3.0 (worse)
Time frame: week 24
World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire
World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire, scale 0 (worse) - 100 (best)
Time frame: week 24
Morning stiffness
Morning joint stiffness, (minutes), scale 0 (best) - infinite (worst)
Time frame: week 24
Fatigue
Fatigue, visual analogue scale, scale 0 (worse) - 100 (best)
Time frame: week 24