Background: Although placement of an intra-cerebral catheter remains the gold standard method for measuring intracranial pressure (ICP), there are several limitations to the method. Objectives: The main objective of this study was to compare the correlation and the agreement of the wave morphology between the ICP (standard ICP monitoring) and a new nICP monitor in patients admitted with stroke. Our secondary objective was to estimate the accuracy of four non-invasive methods to assess intracranial hypertension. Methods: We prospectively collected data of adults admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or ischemic stroke (IS) in whom invasive ICP monitoring placed. Measures had been simultaneously collected from the following non-invasive indices: optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), pulsatility index (PI) using transcranial Doppler (TCD), a 5-point visual scale designed for Computed Tomography (CT) and two parameters (time-to-peak \[TTP\] and P2/P1 ratio) of a non-invasive ICP wave morphology monitor (Brain4care\[B4c\]). Intracranial hypertension was defined as an invasively measured ICP \> 20 mmHg for at least five minutes.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
18
We prospectively collected data of adults admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or ischemic stroke (IS) in whom invasive ICP monitoring placed. Measures had been simultaneously collected from the following non-invasive indices: optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), pulsatility index (PI) using transcranial Doppler (TCD), a 5-point visual scale designed for Computed Tomography (CT) and two parameters (time-to-peak \[TTP\] and P2/P1 ratio) of a non-invasive ICP wave morphology monitor (Brain4care\[B4c\]). Intracranial hypertension was defined as an invasively measured ICP \> 20 mmHg for at least five minutes
Federal University of São Paulo
São Paulo, Brazil
Comparison between ICP morphology between a non invasive (Brain4care [B4c]) and a invasive (intraventricular) method
Parameter of the ICP wave between methods were compared (P2/P1 ratio)
Time frame: At least 30 minutes for every patient
Comparison between ICP morphology between a non invasive (Brain4care [B4c]) and a invasive (intraventricular) method
Parameter of the ICP wave between methods were compared (Time-to-Peak)
Time frame: At least 30 minutes for every patient
Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension using Transcranial Doppler
We measured the Pulsatility Index using transcranial Doppler (TCD) and calculated a ROC curve to calculate its discriminatory power
Time frame: At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension using optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD)
We measured the ONSD for both eyes and calculated a ROC curve to evaluate its discriminatory power in detecting Intracranial Hypertension
Time frame: At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension using a non-invasive ICP wave parameter (P2/P1 ratio).
We measured the mean P2/P1 ratio and calculated a ROC curve to evaluate its discriminatory power in detecting Intracranial Hypertension. We calculated the points in the scale and built a ROC curve to evaluate its discriminatory power in detecting Intracranial Hypertension
Time frame: At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension using a non-invasive ICP wave parameter (Time-to_peak).
We measured the mean TTP and calculated a ROC curve to evaluate its discriminatory power in detecting Intracranial Hypertension.
Time frame: At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
Estimation of Intracranial Hypertension using a 5-point visual scale designed for Computed Tomography (CT)
We calculated the points in the scale and built a ROC curve to evaluate its discriminatory power in detecting Intracranial Hypertension
Time frame: At least 5 minutes after EVD closure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.