The study plans to compare conventional submuscular reconstruction with definitive implant and muscle sparing reconstruction with definitive implant in selected patients. The two techniques are compared in terms of patient quality of life and satisfaction; patient related outcomes, reconstruction morbidity, early and late complications are also investigated.
The study plans to compare conventional submuscular reconstruction with definitive implant and muscle sparing reconstruction with definitive implant in selected patients. The two techniques are compared in terms of patient quality of life and satisfaction; patient related outcomes, reconstruction morbidity, early and late complications are also investigated. The study plans to collect robust data to support the prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage of implant with acellular dermal matrix in the clinical practice. Consequently, the project plans to move toward evidence-based medicine in breast reconstruction, avoiding marketing influences and surgeon experience as the sole source of evidence.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
58
Prepectoral breast reconstruction
Submuscolar breast reconstruction
European Institute of Oncology
Milan, Italy
Satisfaction assessed by the BREAST-Q
The BREAST-Q survey is used to detect differences in patient satisfaction among the groups
Time frame: 1 year
Immediate complications rate
Compare post operative complications
Time frame: 1 month
Short term complications rate
Compare short term post operative complications
Time frame: 6 months
Long term complications rate
Compare long term post operative complications
Time frame: 24 months
Percentage of capsular contracture
Compare overall aesthetic outcomes (percentage of capsular contracture) using standardized photographs assessed by independent blinded observers
Time frame: 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.