The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Adient absorbable filter for the prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE: blood clot in the lungs). PE claims the lives of over 100,000 Americans each year, more than breast cancer, traffic fatalities and HIV combined. Pharmaceutical anticoagulation (blood thinners) that reduce blood clot formation represent the standard of care for treating patients at risk for PE. However, for people who are temporarily unable to use anticoagulants, such as those who have suffered major trauma or those who are scheduled for surgical procedures, inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are used to help protect against PE. These blood filters prevent large blood clots that originate in the deep veins of the legs (deep vein thrombosis (DVT)) from reaching your lungs causing a potentially life-threatening PE. Conventional metal IVC filters have been proven effective at reducing the incidence of PE, however, most require retrieval. If not retrieved within a timely manner (months), they can perforate the IVC, impale nearby organs with their barbed struts, and cause blood clots. In contrast, the Adient absorbable filter traps blood clots similar to conventional metal IVC filters, but following the 8 week protection period, the filter itself breaks down into carbon dioxide and water. Hence no filter retrieval is required and complications are less likely due to the shortened indwell time. Once blood clots are trapped in the absorbable filter, the body's thrombolytic enzymes dissolve the clots within weeks while the filter itself resorbs in 6 to 8 months. The absorbable filter is braided from absorbable suture that has been proven safe over 4 decades. The question being addressed with the randomized controlled trial portion is whether the placement of the absorbable filter in addition to current best practice PE prevention (sequential compression machines, compression stockings, and anticoagulants when indicated) significantly reduces the incidence of clinically significant PE in high risk subjects. The absorbable filter will be indicated for the temporary prevention of PE in patients with transient high risk for venous thromboembolism (DVT and/or PE) with or without venous thromboembolic disease and as an enhancement to pharmaceutical anticoagulation and mechanical prophylaxis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
854
Adient absorbable filter helps prevent PE during an 8 week protection period then gradually breaks down into carbon dioxide and water within 6 to 8 months. The absorbable filter does not require removal.
Best practice VTE prophylaxis includes sequential compression machines, compression stockings, and anticoagulants (blood thinners) when indicated.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado, United States
IU Health University Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint - Prophylactic Cohort: incidence of new clinically significant PE
Clinically significant PE includes asymptomatic proximal PE screened at 2 weeks, in addition to symptomatic PE through 8 weeks post index event confirmed by computed tomography (CT) angiography. Proximal PE includes thrombus (blood clots) observed in the pulmonary trunk, main pulmonary arteries, or lobar arteries.
Time frame: 2 weeks for asymptomatic proximal PE screening and through 8 weeks for symptomatic PE
Primary Composite Safety Endpoint - Prophylactic Cohort: incidence of absorbable filter deployment without complications
Potential complications include: (a) caval thrombotic occlusion within 9 months, (b) all-filter embolization within 9 months, (c) serious filter-related complications within 9 months, (d) filter placement procedural related Series Adverse Events (SAE) within the perioperative period (96 hours), (e) filter placement vascular access site SAE within the perioperative period, (f) symptomatic PE subsequent to filter deployment within 9 months.
Time frame: 96 hours to 9 months depending on the safety parameter
Primary DVT Safety Endpoint - Prophylactic Cohort: incidence of all DVT post index event
All DVT includes both symptomatic DVT and asymptomatic DVT screened at 2 weeks, 10 weeks and 9 months.
Time frame: 9 months overall duration
Primary Composite Safety and Effectiveness Endpoint - Therapeutic Cohort: composite rate of technical filter placement success without complications
Potential complications include (a) new symptomatic PE through 8 weeks, (b) filter migration (\> 2cm), (c) filter embolization, (d) caval perforation (\> 5mm), (e) symptomatic caval thrombosis, and (f) any other symptomatic filter-related complication requiring invasive intervention, or filter related death.
Time frame: 9 months
Incidence of new symptomatic PE through 8 weeks confirmed by CT angiography
Time frame: 8 weeks
Miller Score for symptomatic and asymptomatic PE
Quantification of the occlusion of the pulmonary vascular bed from a PE.
Time frame: 9 months
Incidence of caval occlusion / thrombosis confirmed by CT cavogram
Time frame: 10 weeks
Incidence of IVC caval stenosis and occlusion confirmed by CT cavogram
Time frame: 9 months
Incidence of common femoral and iliac venous thrombosis ipsilateral to filter insertion site
Detected on ultrasound.
Time frame: 2 weeks, 10 weeks, and 9 months
Incidence of DVT
Detected on ultrasound.
Time frame: 2 weeks, 10 weeks, and 9 months
Incidence of major procedure-related or device-related adverse events
Time frame: 9 months
Incidence of major bleeding
Major bleeding defined by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostases.
Time frame: 9 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.