The pressing need for effective fibromyalgia (FM) treatments, the known safety of psilocybin therapy, and the mechanistic plausibility for potential benefit provide a backdrop for investigating psilocybin therapy as a treatment for FM. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical benefit of oral psilocybin in concert with psychotherapy to treat chronic pain symptoms in patients with FM.
Fibromyalgia is a chronic syndrome of widespread musculoskeletal pain that often manifests with a cluster of co-occurring symptoms, including sleep disturbances, fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and mood problems including anxiety and depression. Recent studies have provided evidence of altered central pain pathways. Current management of FM typically takes a multidimensional approach including behavioral therapy, exercise, and medication. However, current medications provide only modest benefit and carry significant side effect burden, leading many people with FM to seek other alternatives. Psilocybin therapy (psilocybin delivered in concert with psychotherapy) may be a potentially safe and effective treatment for symptoms associated with FM. Indeed, psilocybin therapy has shown positive effects in treating cancer-related psychiatric distress, depression and anxiety, treatment-resistant depression, and nicotine or alcohol addiction. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted a Breakthrough Therapy designation for psilocybin in treatment-resistant depression and major depressive disorder. Psilocybin therapy is generally safe and well-tolerated when conducted under controlled conditions. While no clinical studies have explored psychedelic effects among people with FM, a recent review outlined potential mechanisms through which psychedelics could alleviate chronic pain symptoms.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
17
Two oral doses of psilocybin in a capsule formulation taken approximately 2 weeks apart.
1\. Pre-dose preparatory sessions; 2. Dosing day monitoring; and, 3. Post-dose integration sessions.
Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Heart Rate Beats Per Minute (BPM) - First Dose (15 mg)
BPM was measured before TRP-8802 capsule administration and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes after capsule administration.
Time frame: Day 22 Pre-Dose (Baseline) and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes post-dose
Heart Rate Beats Per Minute (BPM) - Second Dose (25 mg)
BPM was measured before TRP-8802 capsule administration and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes after capsule administration.
Time frame: Day 36 Pre-Dose (Baseline) and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes post-dose
Blood Pressure (BP) - First Dose (15 mg) - Systolic
Systolic BP was measured in millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) before TRP-8802 capsule administration and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes after capsule administration. Systolic BP greater than 200 for more than 15 minutes was considered to be an adverse event.
Time frame: Day 22 Pre-Dose (Baseline) and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes post-dose
Blood Pressure (BP) - Second Dose (25 mg) - Systolic
BP was measured in millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) before TRP-8802 capsule administration and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes after capsule administration. Systolic BP greater than 200 for more than 15 minutes was considered to be an adverse event.
Time frame: Day 36 Pre-Dose (Baseline) and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes post-dose
Blood Pressure (BP) - First Dose (15 mg) - Diastolic
Diastolic BP was measured in millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) before TRP-8802 capsule administration and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes after capsule administration. BP greater than 110 diastolic for more than 15 minutes was considered to be an adverse event.
Time frame: Day 22 Pre-Dose (Baseline) and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes post-dose
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Blood Pressure (BP) - Second Dose (25 mg) - Diastolic
Diastolic BP was measured in millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) before TRP-8802 capsule administration and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes after capsule administration. BP greater than 110 diastolic for more than 15 minutes was considered to be an adverse event.
Time frame: Day 36 Pre-Dose (Baseline) and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 minutes post-dose
Adverse Events (AE) Incidence
Results reflect the total number of all adverse events that occurred during the trial.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 64
Change in Pain Interference
Pain interference is the degree to which pain affects important aspects of an individual's life, such as social, cognitive, and physical activities. Pain interference was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference scale from the PROMIS-29+2 Profile v2.1 (PROPr). The raw scores were converted to standardized T-scores, with 50 as the population mean with a standard deviation of 10, and higher scores indicating worse pain interference.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 64
Sleep Disturbance
Sleep disturbance included assessment of sleep quality, perceived ability to fall and stay asleep, satisfaction of sleep, and depth of sleep. Sleep disturbance was measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b. The raw scores were converted to standardized T-scores, with 50 as the population mean with a standard deviation of 10, and higher scores indicating worse sleep disturbance.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 64
Chronic Pain Acceptance
Chronic Pain Acceptance was measured using that Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8 (CPAQ-8) that assessed activity engagement and pain willingness (e.g., recognizing that trying to avoid or control pain may be maladaptive for chronic pain). The lowest possible score was 0 (full chronic pain acceptance) and the highest possible score was 48 (no chronic pain acceptance).
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 64
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)
The PGI-C was a questionnaire that gauged the participant's response to medical interventions using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 7 with 1 being "very much improved" and 7 being "very much worse".
Time frame: Day 64
Chronic Pain Intensity Between Groups in the Study Period
Aggregated worst pain intensity scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (highest pain possible) during 7-day epochs from day 1 through day 64. Participants' scores from Days 1-7 and Days 57-63 were compared.
Time frame: Days 1-7 & Days 57-63