Context: Until 70% of thrombotic event are reported during Sars-CoV2 infection. Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) tests are often positive. We aim to determine if aPL positivity is involved in thrombose of Sars-CoV2 infection investigating the effect of aPL on thrombin generation (TG) and leucocyte pathway activation (neutrophils extracellular traps (NETs) and activation of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (TREM-1)). Method: We will compare plasma from five groups of subjects: patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and patients hospitalized for Sars-CoV-2 infection with or without aPL, and as control, patients with acute venous thromboembolism event and healthy volunteers. For each subject, we will analyze aPL, activated protein C (APC) resistance measured by TG and leukocytes markers as circulating neutrophils extracellular traps (NETs) and soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells one (sTREM-1). We will control aPL test at three month and analyze their persistent positivity and association with thrombotic event. Results: we hypothesize that patients with COVID-19 and aPL will have a similar aPL and level of APS resistance that patients with APS. Also, we think that circulating NETs and sTREM-1 levels will be more important in patients with COVID-19 with aPL than patients without aPL and similar in patients with COVID-19 and aPL and patients with APS. Conclusion: our study will be the first to analyze the potential role of aPL on APC resistance measured by TG and neutrophil activation in COVID-19.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
161
characterization of aPL profile, GT profile and leukocytes activations markers (NETs, TREM-1)
Virginie Dufrost
Nancy, France
Frequency of activated protein C resistance and comparison between groups
Time frame: at inclusion
frequency of positivity of each aPL test and comparison between groups
Time frame: at inclusion
concentration of leucocytes activation markers and comparison between groups
Time frame: at inclusion
frequency of persistent aPL test positivity and comparison between groups
Time frame: at three month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.