Adolescents with ASD and intellectual disability (ID) are a complex and underserved population. Approximately 50% of individuals with ASD/ID experience significant anxiety. Yet, there are very limited mental health care interventions available for this population. Addressing anxiety and building coping skills is particularly important during adolescence as coping skills can support a successful transition to adulthood and family functioning during a difficult developmental period. The current investigators adapted a cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) manualized intervention, Facing Your Fears, for adolescents with ASD/ID (FYF:ASD/ID) and completed a pilot study with 23 teens. Preliminary results indicated significant improvements in anxiety and mood symptoms. The proposed study seeks to test whether FYF:ASD/ID is more effective in reducing anxiety than treatment-as-usual (TAU). The investigators propose a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) with 36 adolescents with ASD/ID (12-18 years) randomized to FYF: ASD/ID and 36 adolescents randomized to TAU for 14 weeks. The 36 teens randomized to TAU will then cross-over and complete FYF:ASD/ID. Evaluations will take place at Baseline, Post-Intervention, and 6-month follow-up. Teens in the TAU will have two baseline assessments prior to crossing over to FYF:ASD/ID; both groups will complete a 6-month follow-up assessment after finishing FYF:ASD/ID. There are three aims for this project: (1) examine the efficacy of FYF: ASD/ID relative to TAU in improving anxiety as measured by parent report and determine if any gains noted in the FYF:ASD/ID are maintained at 6-month follow-up; (2) examine secondary outcomes of anxiety such as how emotion regulation and problem behavior are affected by participation in FYF:ASD/ID; and (3) examine whether adolescents' independent use of CBT skills (as assessed by goal attainment ratings of prompting level required to use strategies) to manage anxiety are increased following participation in FYF:ASD/ID.
Background: Adolescents with ASD and intellectual disability (ID) are a complex and under-served population. Anxiety occurs at higher rates in individuals with ASD/ID (53%) than in ID alone (17%) and may result in physical distress, avoidance of stressful situations, and problem behavior. Further, it frequently contributes to caregivers "taking over" tasks for youth with ID and limiting independence. Parents voice concern about treatment options as the limited available supports often focus on prevention and accommodation of anxiety, rather than on building coping skills. Thus, teens often finish high school with limited coping abilities and consequently experience heightened anxiety in the workplace and poor job retention. Yet, when coping skills are taught early in adolescence, there is an opportunity to practice coping prior to transition, leading to better employment rates, decreased clinical service use, and increased long-term wages. Addressing anxiety and building coping skills for teens with ASD/ID is of critical importance as these are per-requisite skills for successful transition to adulthood. Intervention: A significant treatment barrier for teens with ASD/ID is the lack of evidence based, manualized interventions for this population. This is due, in part, because youth with ASD/ID have typically been excluded from intervention research trials examining the effectiveness of best practice treatments such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Recent research adapting CBT to meet the cognitive, social, and behavioral needs of this population have yielded promising results and challenge the paradigm that individuals with ID are not able to access cognitive and emotion regulation strategies. The research team for the present study adapted a CBT manualized intervention, Facing Your Fears, for adolescents with ASD/ID (FYF:ASD/ID) and completed a pilot study with 23 teens. Preliminary outcome measures indicated significant improvements in anxiety and mood symptoms. Objective: The current study seeks to test whether FYF:ASD/ID, an adapted CBT intervention for teens with ASD/ID, is more effective in reducing anxiety than treatment-as-usual (TAU). Study Design: The investigators will use a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) with 36 adolescents with ASD/ID (12-18 years) randomized to FYF: ASD/ID and 36 adolescents randomized to TAU for 14 weeks. The 36 teens randomized to TAU will then cross-over and complete FYF:ASD/ID. Evaluations will take place at Baseline, Post-Intervention, and 6-month follow-up. Teens in the TAU will have two baseline assessments prior to crossing over to FYF:ASD/ID; both groups will complete a 6-month follow-up assessment after finishing FYF:ASD/ID. Specific Aims: Three aims are proposed: (1) examine the efficacy of FYF: ASD/ID relative to TAU in improving anxiety as measured by parent report and determine if gains are maintained at 6-month follow-up; (2) examine secondary outcomes of anxiety such as how emotion regulation and problem behavior are affected by participation in FYF:ASD/ID; and (3) examine whether adolescents' independent use of CBT skills (as assessed by goal attainment ratings of prompting level required to use strategies) to manage anxiety are increased following participation in FYF:ASD/ID. Impact: The present study would represent the first RCT of a CBT intervention for adolescents with ASD/ID, a critical step toward establishing an evidence base for anxiety treatment for this underserved and vulnerable population. Translatability: It is necessary to close the gap in the availability of anxiety interventions and ensure effective mental health care for all individuals on the spectrum. Completing a well-designed RCT that incorporates random assignment, a control group, and careful measurement of anxiety is a critical next step in evaluating the effectiveness of this CBT treatment and supporting the study of interventions that can contribute to positive coping skills that allow teens to access time limited transition services and optimize outcome.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
73
This cognitive behavioral therapy, entitled Facing Your Fears for Adolescents with Autism and Intellectual Disability, is focused on somatic management, helpful cognitive mantras, emotion regulation, and graduated exposure adapted for the cognitive and linguistic needs of an Intellectual Disability population.
The treatment as usual condition is being used in this study as a control condition. The investigators will track what medication and intervention services families are currently receiving.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado, United States
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Change in number of anxiety diagnoses as measured by the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule: Autism Addendum (ADIS:ASA)
The ADIS:ASA is a semi-structured clinical interview completed with a parent that assesses anxiety diagnoses in children and adolescents with ASD. This measure provides a total number of anxiety diagnoses for a child. The interview will be administered and anxiety diagnoses recorded at the following time points: Baseline (i.e., within 6 weeks' start of the treatment or TA condition), Post treatment (i.e., within 6 weeks of the completion of the14-week treatment or TAU condition), and follow-up (six months following the completion of the treatment condition). Change in the total number of anxiety diagnoses that a child meets diagnostic criteria for on the ADIS:ASA will be calculated across the aforementioned time points.
Time frame: Baseline (i.e., within 6 weeks' start of the treatment or TAU condition), Post treatment (i.e., within 6 weeks of the completion of the14-week treatment or TAU condition), and follow-up (six months following the completion of the treatment condition)
Change in the Clinical Global Improvement-Severity score as derived by the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule: Autism Addendum (ADIS:ASA)
Clinical Global Improvement-severity (CGI-S) scores are derived from the ADIS:ASA. The CGI-S is a summary rating (i.e., likert scale of 1 to 7 with 7 indicating very severe) indicating the extent to which the teen's anxiety symptoms assessed via the ADIS:ASA impact daily functioning. To calculate change in anxiety severity, the CGI-S ratings are calculated at baseline (i.e., 6 weeks prior to the start of the 14-week TAU condition of intervention condition), post-treatment (i.e., within 6 weeks of the end of the completion of the 14-week TAU condition and intervention group conditions) and at follow-up (i.e., 6 months following the completion of the 14-week TAU intervention group). Change in CGI-S ratings across these time points are calculated.
Time frame: Baseline (i.e., within 6 weeks' start of the treatment or TAU condition), Post treatment (i.e., within 6 weeks of the completion of the14-week treatment or TAU condition), and follow-up (six months following the completion of the treatment condition)
Change in the Reactivity subscale as assessed by the Emotion Dysregulation Inventory (EDI)
The EDI is a parent report measure of emotion dysregulation in youth with ASD. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very severe). The Reactivity sub-scale contains 7-items. Possible scores on the Reactivity sub-scale could range from 7 to 35, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. To calculate change in Reactivity the total score on the sub-scale is calculated at baseline (i.e., 6 weeks prior to the start of the 14-week TAU condition of intervention condition), post-treatment (i.e., within 6 weeks of the end of the completion of the 14-week TAU condition and intervention group conditions) and at follow-up (i.e., 6 months following the completion of the 14-week TAU intervention group).
Time frame: Baseline (i.e., within 6 weeks' start of the treatment or TAU condition), Post treatment (i.e., within 6 weeks of the completion of the14-week treatment or TAU condition), and follow-up (six months following the completion of the treatment condition)
Change in the Dysphoria subscale as assessed by the Emotion Dysregulation Inventory (EDI)
The EDI is a parent report measure of emotion dysregulation in youth with ASD. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very severe). The Dysphoria subscale contains 6-items. Possible scores on the Reactivity subscale could range from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. To assess change in Dysphoria, the total score on the Dysphoria subscale is calculated at baseline (i.e., 6 weeks prior to the start of the 14-week TAU condition of intervention condition), post-treatment (i.e., within 6 weeks of the end of the completion of the 14-week TAU condition and intervention group conditions) and at follow-up (i.e., 6 months following the completion of the 14-week TAU intervention group). Change is assessed across these time points.
Time frame: Baseline (i.e., within 6 weeks' start of the treatment or TAU condition), Post treatment (i.e., within 6 weeks of the completion of the14-week treatment or TAU condition), and follow-up (six months following the completion of the treatment condition)
Change in problem behavior as assessed by the The Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community (ABC-C)
The ABC-C is a 58-item parent report questionnaire that evaluates the presence and severity of problem behavior across five sub-scales: Irritability, Lethargy/Social Withdrawal, Stereotypic Behavior, Hyperactivity/Noncompliance sub-scales, and Inappropriate Speech. Each item is rated on a scale of 0-3 with 0 being "not at all a problem" and 3 being "the problem is severe in degree." Total problem behavior raw scores across the five sub-scales range from 0-174.To assess change in problem behavior, the total raw score is calculated at baseline (i.e., 6 weeks prior to the start of the 14-week TAU condition of intervention condition), post-treatment (i.e., within 6 weeks of the end of the completion of the 14-week TAU condition and intervention group conditions) and at follow-up (i.e., 6 months following the completion of the 14-week TAU intervention group). Change is assessed across these time points.
Time frame: Baseline (i.e., within 6 weeks' start of the treatment or TAU condition), Post treatment (i.e., within 6 weeks of the completion of the14-week treatment or TAU condition), and follow-up (six months following the completion of the treatment condition)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.