This trial is a randomized feasibility trial to determine the feasibility of comparing two different shoe inserts and on pain, quality of life and physical activity associated with hip osteoarthritis.
Participants will be randomized to one of two groups - contoured prefabricated foot orthoses or flat shoe inserts (the comparator). Participants will be asked to use the inserts daily for a six week period. Adherence to the intervention will be monitored using a daily diary, as well as adverse events and co-interventions. The primary outcome is feasibility domains (Demand, Implementation, Acceptability, Practicality) with secondary outcomes of change in hip-related pain and quality of life and physical activity levels. The primary time-point will be 6-weeks.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
28
Manufacturer: Foot Science International. Material: High grade thermoformable closed-cell polyolefin foam (medium density) Arch support: inbuilt. Covering: fabric Provided by: Study Practitioner: Registered physiotherapist \> 2 years musculoskeletal experience will be trained to prescribe the insert according to the prescription algorithm. Where: Administered via telehealth When and how much: Week 0 to 1: one telehealth session with study practitioner to fit one pair of pre-fabricated orthoses Week 1 to 2: Follow-up session for questions if required Tailoring: Orthoses are fit to comfort. Lengths (S, S, M, L, XL, XXL) (dependent on participant's shoe size). Hardness = Medium density. Modifications: can be cut to size to assist in fit using the shoes original sock liner as a guide, by participants using standard scissors. Heat molding: optional. Adherence: Adherence recorded with diary/ log book (insert wear time)
Manufacturer: Foot Science International. Material: High grade thermoformable closed-cell polyolefin foam (medium density) Arch support: no. Covering: fabric Provided by: Study Practitioner: Registered physiotherapist \> 2 years musculoskeletal experience will be trained to prescribe the insert according to the prescription algorithm. Where: Administered via telehealth When and how much: Week 0 to 1: one telehealth session with study practitioner to fit one pair of pre-fabricated orthoses Week 1 to 2: Follow-up session for questions if required Tailoring: Fit to comfort. Lengths (S, S, M, L, XL, XXL) (dependent on participant's shoe size). Hardness = Medium density. Modifications: can be cut to size to assist in fit using the shoes original sock liner as a guide, by participants using standard scissors. Heat molding: optional. Adherence: Adherence recorded with diary/ log book (insert wear time)
La Trobe University
Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
RECRUITINGFeasibility: adherence
Recruitment rate (average 1 participant per week); 50% log-book completion rate (daily); drop-out \<20%; 35 hours per week adherence to intervention (log book)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Hip-related pain
Hip osteoarthritis outcome score: pain sub-scale (HOOS-12). Scores range for 0 (better outcomes) - 100 (worse outcomes)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Hip-related physical function
Hip osteoarthritis outcome score: function and daily living subscale. Scores range for 0 (better outcomes) - 100 (worse outcomes)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Hip-related quality of life
hip osteoarthritis outcome score: quality of life subscale: Scores range for 0 (better outcomes) - 100 (worse outcomes)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Fear of movement
Brief Fear of Movement Scale for osteoarthritis (BFOM); 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating lower fear of movement (better score)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Depressive symptoms
Patient Health Questionnaire -9: Scored from 0 to 27, participants can be classified as having mild (≥ 5), moderate (≥ 10), moderately severe (≥ 15) and severe (≥ 20) depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Physical activity- Self-reported
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire: Participants will be asked to recall their physical activity over the last 7 days with regard to vigorous physical activity, moderate physical activity, walking and sitting.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Physical activity- Walking based physical activity
Will be measured with a tri-axial accelerometer-based activity monitor that is attached on the thigh (activPAL model 4 micro; PAL Technologies Ltd, Glasgow, UK) and will be expressed as a) daily minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity using the established 100 steps/minute threshold and b) total daily steps (which captures both inside and outside the home walking activity).
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Global rating of change- Physical activity
Seven point rating scale. Much better, better, a little better, no change, a little worse, worse, much worse
Time frame: Week 6
Global rating of change- Symptoms
Seven point rating scale. Much better, better, a little better, no change, a little worse, worse, much worse
Time frame: Week 6