The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of different treatment modalities on clinical outcome of patients suffering from acute lower limb ischemia (ALI). Depending on clinical presentation, anatomical as well as technical considerations, different treatment options are available for revascularisation of affected limbs. Using an observational, international, multicentric study design (min. patient number of 500), the defined primary endpoint of the study, amputation-free survival 90 days after the diagnosis of ALI, will be evaluated.
Recently published clinical guidelines highlighted that the available evidence on the management of acute lower limb ischemia (ALI) is mostly outdated and includes only small patient cohorts. Depending on the patient's characteristics, the duration of ischemic symptoms as well as the cause of ALI and the anatomical lesion, different treatment options are available and need to be compared regarding clinical outcome. With the knowledge about the heterogeneity of patients suffering from ALI, a multicentre observational study design has the potential to give results on influence of several factors (patient related factors, treatment related factors) on clinical outcome of patients with lower extremity ALI. In contrast, a randomized controlled trial would not be feasible as heterogeneity of patients would lead to limitations in the recruitment of patients. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of different treatment modalities on clinical outcome of patients suffering from acutle lower limb ischemia. Depending on clinical presentation, anatomical as well as technical considerations, different treatment options are available for revascularisation of affected limbs. Using an observational, international, multicentric study design (min. patient number of 500), the defined primary endpoint of the study, amputation-free survival 90 days after the diagnosis of ALI, will be evaluated. The secondary objectives of this study are the identification of factors having an effect on the primary endpoint . These factors are: * Demographic data (age, gender, Body Mass Index, * Cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking history) * COVID-19 anamnesis (infectious status; vaccination status) * Pre-existing diseases (Arterial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, hemodialysis, coronary artery disease, COVID infection in medical history, pulmonary disease) * Risk factors for ALI (peripheral arterial disease, aortic aneurysm or dissection, arterial embolization in medical history, malignant disease, peripheral arterial aneurysm, previous stroke, thrombophilia, revascularization procedure on ipsilateral limb) * Pre-existing medication (antiplatelet, oral anticoagulation, statins) * Clinical presentation (Rutherford ischemia classification, Cause of ALI, anatomical level of arterial occlusion, diagnostic imaging modality) * Details on performed intervention (time of ischemia, periprocedural heparin administration, type of procedure, technical details on performed procedure, compartment syndrome with need for fasciotomy) * Outcome parameters (Survival, Rutherford ischemia classification, residual sensory or motor deficit, impaired walking distance, need for reintervention, major bleeding periprocedural, access site complications, organ failure) 30 and 90 days after diagnosis of ALI.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
700
Endovascular or surgical restoration of arterial blood flow.
Primary below- or above knee major amputation without prior revascularization.
Conservative treatment of acute lower limb ischemia - without prior revascularization.
Amputation free survival - rate
Rate of amputation free survival after diagnosis of acute lower limb ischemia
Time frame: 90 days
Re-intervention rate of the index leg
Rate of re-intervention for revascularization or complications of the index-leg
Time frame: 90 days
Complication rate
Rate of complications after the diagnosis of acute limb ischemia (access site infection, acute kidney injury, periprocedural major bleeding, compartment syndrome, multi organ failure)
Time frame: 90 days
Limb salvage rate
Rate of patients not requiring major amputation.
Time frame: 90 days
Survival rate
Rate of patients surviving the diagnosis of acute limb ischemia until the end of follow-up
Time frame: 90 days
Clinical outcome of the index leg (Rutherford category)
Clinical symptoms at the end of follow up (Rutherford category)
Time frame: 90 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Vascular Surgery
Innsbruck, Austria
Department of General Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, Austria
Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital Ottakring
Vienna, Austria
Department of Cardio-Vascular Surgery, Clinic Floridsdorf and Karl Landsteiner Institute for Cardio-Vascular Research
Vienna, Austria
University Hospital Merkur
Zagreb, Croatia
Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital of Antibes Juan-les-Pins
Antibes, France
Department of Vascular Surgery, Bordeaux University Hospital
Bordeaux, France
Department of Vascular Surgery, Ambroise Paré University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris
Boulogne-Billancourt, France
Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Brest University Hospital
Brest, France
Department of Vascular Surgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital
Créteil, France
...and 27 more locations