Comparision of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy to learn successful tracheal intubation by novices in anaesthesiology
Video laryngoscopy has been recommended as an alternative during difficult conventional direct laryngoscopy using the Macintosh blade. However, successful visualisation of the larynx and tracheal intubation using some of the indirect laryngoscopes or video laryngoscopy requires hand-eye coordination. To best of our knowledge in the current literature there are no data how is the best educative way to learn successful tracheal intubation by novices in anaesthesiology.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
10
In a randomised order we evaluate the first pass success rate of the tracheal tube into the trachea.
In a randomized order we evaluate the first pass success rate of the tracheal tube into the trachea.
Department of Anesthesiology,Prof. C. Werner, Universitätsmedizin of the JG University
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
RECRUITINGFirst pass success rate
successful tracheal intubation at the first attempt, compared to more than one attempt
Time frame: at intubation in 60 seconds
Time to ventilation
From Insertion of the blase into the mouth until first ventilation
Time frame: at intubation in 120 seconds
Cormack and Lehane Classification
after insert the device the user describe the glottis visualisation
Time frame: at intubation in 120 seconds
Overall success rate
after two attempts using defined rescue techniques (e.g. rigid stylet, laryngeal mask)
Time frame: at intubation in 120 seconds
Subjective Training Process
after 25 intubation attempts
Time frame: at one month
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.