The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of 2 different doses (10 or 30 µg) of GRT-R910 when administered as a boost in healthy adults previously vaccinated with the AstraZeneca, Janssen/Johnson and Johnson, Moderna, or Pfizer/BioNTech Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines.
This trial studied a self-amplifying messenger ribonucleic acid (samRNA) based vaccine (GRT-R910) in previously vaccinated adults (≥18 years). GRT-R910 uses a codon optimized, prefusion stabilized Spike (S) cassette with additional T cell epitopes (TCEs) covering multiple epitopes from non-spike proteins to safely drive strong, broad, and durable B and T cell immune responses to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
45
Injection administered intramuscularly
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS
Birmingham, United Kingdom
University Hospital of Leicester NHS Trust
Leicester, United Kingdom
Manchester University
Manchester, United Kingdom
Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Local Adverse Event (AE) Within 8 Days After the Injection of Prime Dose
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of an intervention in humans, whether or not considered intervention-related in a participant or clinical investigation participant who administered a pharmaceutical product regardless of its causal relationship to the study treatment. Solicited local AEs included injection site pain, injection site tenderness, injection site erythema, injection site edema/induration. Solicited AEs (reactogenicity) were collected using a memory aid.
Time frame: Within 8 Days After the Injection of Prime Dose on Day 1
Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Local AE Within 8 Days After the Injection of Booster Dose
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of an intervention in humans, whether or not considered intervention-related in a participant or clinical investigation participant who administered a pharmaceutical product regardless of its causal relationship to the study treatment. Solicited local AEs included injection site pain, injection site tenderness, injection site erythema, injection site edema/induration. Solicited AEs (reactogenicity) were collected using a memory aid.
Time frame: Within 8 Days After the Injection of Booster Dose on Day 113 (Cohorts 1, 2); Within 8 Days After the Injection of Booster Dose on Day 29 (Cohorts 3, 4, 6)
Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic AE Within 8 Days After the Injection of Prime Dose
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of an intervention in humans, whether or not considered intervention-related in a participant or clinical investigation participant who administered a pharmaceutical product regardless of its causal relationship to the study treatment. Solicited systemic AEs included headache, fatigue, malaise, myalgia, arthralgia, nausea, fever, and chills. Solicited AEs (reactogenicity) were collected using a memory aid.
Time frame: Within 8 Days After the Injection of Prime Dose on Day 1
Number of Participants With at Least One Solicited Systemic AE Within 8 Days After the Injection of Booster Dose
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of an intervention in humans, whether or not considered intervention-related in a participant or clinical investigation participant who administered a pharmaceutical product regardless of its causal relationship to the study treatment. Solicited systemic AEs included headache, fatigue, malaise, myalgia, arthralgia, nausea, fever, and chills. Solicited AEs (reactogenicity) were collected using a memory aid.
Time frame: Within 8 Days After the Injection of Booster Dose on Day 113 (Cohorts 1, 2); Within 8 Days After the Injection of Booster Dose on Day 29 (Cohorts 3, 4, 6)
Number of Participants With at Least One Unsolicited Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) Within 28 Days After the Injection of Prime Dose
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of an intervention in humans, whether or not considered intervention-related in a participant or clinical investigation participant who administered a pharmaceutical product regardless of its causal relationship to the study treatment. A TEAE was defined as any event not observed before the first vaccination or any event observed before the first vaccination that worsens in intensity or frequency after exposure.
Time frame: Within 28 Days After the Injection of Prime Dose on Day 1
Number of Participants With at Least One Unsolicited TEAEs Within 28 Days After the Injection of Booster Dose
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of an intervention in humans, whether or not considered intervention-related in a participant or clinical investigation participant who administered a pharmaceutical product regardless of its causal relationship to the study treatment. A TEAE was defined as any event not observed before the first vaccination or any event observed before the first vaccination that worsens in intensity or frequency after exposure.
Time frame: Within 28 Days After the Injection of Booster Dose on Day 113 (Cohorts 1, 2); Within 8 Days After the Injection of Booster Dose on Day 29 (Cohorts 3, 4, 6)
Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets, Leukocytes at Day 8 in Participants Without Booster Dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8
Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets, Leukocytes at Day 8 in Participants With Booster Dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8
Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets, Leukocytes at Day 120 in Participants With Booster Dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 120
Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets, Leukocytes at Day 8 in Cohorts 3, 4, and 6
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8
Change From Baseline in Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Platelets, Leukocytes at Day 37 in Cohorts 3, 4, and 6
Time frame: Baseline, Day 37
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Day 8 in Participants Without Booster Dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Day 8 in Participants With Booster Dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Day 120 in Participants With Booster Dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 120
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Day 8 in Cohorts 3, 4, and 6
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Day 37 in Cohorts 3, 4, and 6
Time frame: Baseline, Day 37
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, and Aspartate Aminotransferase at Day 8 in Participants Without Booster Dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, and Aspartate Aminotransferase at Day 8 in Participants With Booster Dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, and Aspartate Aminotransferase at Day 120 in Participants With Booster Dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 120
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, and Aspartate Aminotransferase at Day 8 in Cohorts 3, 4, and 6
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, and Aspartate Aminotransferase at Day 37 in Cohorts 3, 4, and 6
Time frame: Baseline, Day 37
Change From Baseline in Bilirubin and Creatinine at Day 8 in Participants Without Booster Dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8
Change From Baseline in Bilirubin and Creatinine at Day 8 in Participants With Booster Dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8
Change From Baseline in Bilirubin and Creatinine at Day 120 in Participants With Booster Dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 120
Change From Baseline in Bilirubin and Creatinine at Day 8 in Cohorts 3, 4, and 6
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8
Change From Baseline in Bilirubin and Creatinine at Day 37 in Cohorts 3, 4, and 6
Time frame: Baseline, Day 37
Change From Baseline in Creatine Kinase at Day 8 in Participants Without Booster Dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8
Change From Baseline in Creatine Kinase at Day 8 in Participants With Booster Dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8
Change From Baseline in Creatine Kinase at Day 120 in Participants With Booster Dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 120
Change From Baseline in Creatine Kinase at Day 8 in Cohorts 3, 4, and 6
Time frame: Baseline, Day 8
Change From Baseline in Creatine Kinase at Day 37 in Cohorts 3, 4, and 6
Time frame: Baseline, Day 37
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious AEs (SAEs), AE of Special Interest (AESIs) Including Potentially Immune-mediated Medical Conditions (PIMMCs), Medically Attended AEs (MAAEs), and New Onset Chronic Medical Conditions (NOCMCs)
An AE or adverse experience was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant who was administered a pharmaceutical product, with or without a causal relationship with the vaccine. A TEAE was defined as any event not observed before the first vaccination or any event observed before the first vaccination that worsens in intensity or frequency after exposure. A treatment-emergent SAE was defined as any AE that resulted in death, is life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability/permanent damage, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event. Adverse events of special interest were serologically or virologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe COVID-19, NOCMCs, MAAE (hospitalization, an emergency room visit or an otherwise unscheduled visit to or from medical personnel for any reason), and PIMMCs.
Time frame: Day 1 Up to 16 months
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin (Ig)G Level (Spike Wild Type [WT] Variant)
Sera were analyzed for Spike (WT variant)-specific IgG levels pre and post administration of GRT-R910 via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and reported as ELISA laboratory units (ELU)/mL (amount of antibodies in the sample according to the unit assigned by the standard).
Time frame: Baseline, Days 15, 29, 57, 58, 86, 113, 142, 180, 209, 293, 365, 394, 478
Change From Baseline in Neutralizing Antibody (nAb) Levels
Neutralizing antibody titers against live virus were assessed via microneutralization assay. Neutralizing antibody levels were measured for the following variants: WT, Alpha, Beta, Delta, Gamma.
Time frame: For WT: Baseline, Days 15, 29, 57, 58, 86, 113, 142, 180, 209 293, 365, 394, 478; For Alpha, Beta, Delta, Gamma:Baseline, Days 15, 29, 57, 58, 86, 113, 142, 180, 209 293, 365, 394
Number of Participants With Immunogenicity Response by Spike IgG and nAb Variants
Immunogenicity response defined as \>= 2-fold change in the levels from baseline. Response rate was assessed by Spike IgG wild type and nAb Variants \[wild type, alpha, beta, gamma, delta\]. Number of participants with immunogenicity response at any post-baseline timepoint are provided.
Time frame: Baseline to 478 days
Change From Baseline in T Cell Response by Spike Pools (ex Vivo ELISpot)
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from whole blood. T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 D614G were assessed via ex vivo IFNγ ELISpot assay (methods). Cells were stimulated with overlapping peptide (OLP) pools containing peptides that were 15 amino acids in length (15mers) and spanning both S subunits (Spike pool 1-2, 3-4 \[S1\], 5-6, and 7-8 \[S2\]).
Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 29, 58, 113, 142, 180, 209, 293, 365, 478
Change From Baseline in T Cell Response by T Cell Epitope (TCE) Pools (ex Vivo ELISpot)
PBMCs were isolated from whole blood. T cell responses to conserved SARS-CoV-2 viral epitopes were assessed via ex vivo IFNγ ELISpot assay (methods). Responses to Nucleocapsid (Nuc) and open reading frame 3a (ORF3a)/Membrane TCE regions were assessed using OLP pools.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 29, 58, 113, 142, 180, 209, 293, 365, 478
Change From Baseline in Immunogenicity Response by TCE Pools (in Vitro Stimulation)
PBMCs were isolated from whole blood. T cell responses to conserved SARS-CoV-2 viral epitopes were assessed via IFNγ ELISpot assay following in vitro stimulation. Responses to Nuc, ORF3a, and membrane TCE regions were assessed using OLP pools.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 8, 29, 58, 113, 142, 180, 209, 293
Number of Participants With Immunogenicity Response by Spike Pools and TCE Pools (ex Vivo ELISpot)
T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 D614G and conserved non-Spike epitopes were assessed via ex vivo IFNγ ELISpot assay (methods) using OLP pools containing peptides that were 15 amino acids in length and spanning both S subunits (Spike pool 1-2, 3-4 \[S1\], 5-6, and 7-8 \[S2\]) and TCE regions Nuc and ORF3a/Membrane. Immunogenicity response was defined as \>= 2-fold change in levels from baseline. Response rate to both Spike pools (Spike pool 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, and 7-8) and TCE pools (Nuc OLP and ORF3a/Membrane OLP) was assessed.
Time frame: Baseline to 478 days