The aim of this study is to evaluate effectiveness of a serum containing 0.3% of MRB, a cosmetic active ingredient, against actinic lentigo and actinic keratosis.
Skin aging is an extremely complex multifactorial process that disrupts the functions and structure of epidermal and dermal cells and extracellular matrix components and has multiple causes including extrinsic phenomena (UV radiation, exposure to pollution, etc.). It has important effects on the skin and is particularly apparent on the face. Indeed, sunlight, in particular ultraviolet light, is an important factor that contributes to cutaneous photoaging by inducing the photo-chronic generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Although skin has its own antioxidant system against ROS, these antioxidant defenses are not fully effective during sun exposure and weaken over time. Photoaging of the skin is characterized by the development of pigmentary disorders, such as actinic lentigos (AL), as well as benign skin tumors such as actinic keratosis (AK), both of which are target pathologies for this study. AL usually occur in the elderly. They are usually benign but can cause aesthetic problems. They are commonly seen on the hands but can appear on all areas of the body, especially on sun-exposed areas such as the face, back, arms, feet, shoulders and skull. There are different treatment approaches, including physical therapy such as laser therapy, pulsed light, chemical peeling, bleaching and cryotherapy or topical therapy such as hydroquinone (HQ). Although topical therapies are generally more time consuming compared to physical therapies, patients can control their own treatment and side effects can be decreased. AK is a very common skin lesion caused by chronic sun damage that typically measure less than 1 cm in diameter. KA is considered a premalignant epithelial skin lesion that may progress to squamous cell carcinoma. For this reason, all KA should be treated and clinical follow-up is recommended. The goals of treatment are: (i) to clinically eradicate obvious and subclinical lesions, (ii) to prevent their progression to EC, and (iii) to reduce the number of relapses and consequently increase the quality of life of patients. Medical treatment with antioxidant properties/actions that would allow the reduction of damaged cells seems to play a role in both the prevention and treatment of AL and KA (Nashan et al., 2013). In addition, a paper published in early 2020 highlighted a major role for carbonylation in the progression of this type of skin lesion (Tramutola et al., 2020). Based on these elements, we hypothesize that our cosmetic active ingredient - MRB - which has antioxidant activity and a specific and original chaperone effect giving it a strong capacity to fight against protein carbonylation- will be effective in the treatment of photo-induced signs of aging: keratoses and actinic lentigo, by a mechanism that acts on the oxidative stress pathway and the maintenance of cellular proteostasis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
35
Serums will be topically applied twice a day (mornings and evenings).
To evaluate MRB 0.3% serum effectiveness after 6 months of treatment on 2 early clinical markers of photoinduced cutaneous aging: actinic lentigo and actinic keratosis
The primary endpoint will be the decrease at 6 months from baseline in the overall score determined by the sum of the total number of actinic lentigos and actinic keratoses on each hemi-face, one receiving MRB 0.3% serum and the other a placebo serum. For men with baldness, the evaluation could be performed on each hemi-skull and/or each hemi-face. The counting of the two types of lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.
Time frame: 6 months
To evaluate 0.3% MRB serum effectiveness versus a placebo serum at inclusion, 1, 3 and 6 months of treatment on the evolution of actinic lentigos on each hemi- face and/or skull
Assessment at inclusion (T0), after 1 month, 3 months and 6 months of treatment of the number of actinic lentigos on each hemiface and/or hemiskull (in men with baldness) treated with MRB serum 0.3% and placebo serum respectively. The counting of the lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.
Time frame: 1, 3 and 6 months
To evaluate 0.3% MRB serum effectiveness versus a placebo serum at inclusion, 1, 3 and 6 months of treatment on the evolution actinic keratoses on each hemi-face/skull
Assessment at inclusion (T0), after 1 month, 3 months and 6 months of treatment of the number of actinic keratoses on each hemi-facial and/or hemi-cranial area (in men with baldness) treated with MRB 0.3% serum and placebo serum respectively. The counting of the lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.
Time frame: 1, 3 and 6 months
To evaluate 0.3% MRB serum effectiveness versus a placebo serum at inclusion, 1, 3 and 6 months of treatment on the grade of actinic keratoses on each hemi-face/skull
Assessment at inclusion (T0), after 1 month, 3 months and 6 months of treatment of the grade of actinic keratosis defined by the AK-FAS (Actinic Keratosis Field Assessment Scale)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 1, 3 and 6 months
To evaluate in the long term, at 9 and 12 months, on the whole face and/or skull the effect of a MRB 0.3% serum on actinic lentigos and actinic keratoses
Assessment after 9 months and 12 months on the whole face and/or skull of the overall score determined by the sum of the total number of actinic lentigos and actinic keratoses on the whole face and/or skull. The counting of the two types of lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.
Time frame: 9 and 12 months
To evaluate in the long term, at 9 and 12 months, on the whole face and/or skull the effect of a MRB 0.3% serum on actinic lentigos
Assessment after 9 months and 12 months on the whole face and/or skull of the number of actinic lentigos. The counting of the lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.
Time frame: 9 and 12 months
To evaluate in the long term, at 9 and 12 months, on the whole face and/or skull the effect of a MRB 0.3% serum on actinic keratoses
Assessment after 9 months and 12 months on the whole face and/or skull of the number of actinic keratoses. The counting of the lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.
Time frame: 9 and 12 months
To evaluate in the long term, at 9 and 12 months, on the whole face and/or skull the effect of a MRB 0.3% serum on the grade of actinic keratoses
Assessment after 9 months and 12 months on the whole face and/or skull of the AK-FAS grade of actinic keratosis.
Time frame: 9 and 12 months
To evaluate in the long term, at 9 and 12 months, on each hemi-face and/or skull the effect of a MRB 0.3% serum on actinic lentigos
Assessment after 9 months and 12 months on each hemi-face and/or hemi-skull (in men with baldness) of the number of actinic lentigos. The counting of the lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.
Time frame: 9 and 12 months
To evaluate in the long term, at 9 and 12 months, on each hemi-face and/or skull the effect of a MRB 0.3% serum on actinic lentigos and actinic keratoses
Assessment after 9 months and 12 months on each hemi-face and/or hemi-skull (in men with baldness) of the overall score determined by the sum of the total number of actinic lentigos and actinic keratoses on each hemi-face. The counting of the two types of lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.
Time frame: 9 and 12 months
To evaluate in the long term, at 9 and 12 months, on each hemi-face and/or skull the effect of a MRB 0.3% serum on actinic keratoses
Assessment after 9 months and 12 months on each hemi-face and/or hemi-skull (in men with baldness) of the number of actinic keratoses. The counting of the two types of lesions will be done by simple dermatological examination.
Time frame: 9 and 12 months
To evaluate in the long term, at 9 and 12 months, on each hemi-face and/or skull (in men with baldness) the effect of a MRB 0.3% serum on the grade of actinic keratoses
Assessment after 9 months and 12 months on each hemi-face and/or hemi-skull (in men with baldness) of the AK-FAS grade of actinic keratosis.
Time frame: 9 and 12 months
To evaluate at each visit, the tolerance of MRB 0.3% serum versus a placebo serum
Tolerance assessed at each visit. It will be assessed by the investigator during the visits using a 5-point scale (0 = Absent, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe, 4 = Extreme) evaluating the following parameters: 1. Erythema 2. Desquamation 3. Burning 4. Pruritus 5. Stretch A global score of tolerance will be calculated by the sum of the 5 parameters. The global score can vary between 0 and 20.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
To evaluate at 6 and 12 months from inclusion, the evolution of a lesioned area and an area of normal skin by confocal microscopy on each hemi-face/skull of 10 volunteer subjects.
Confocal microscopy of a lesioned area and an area of normal skin: a study of the cells of the epidermis (keratinocytes), the dermis (fibroblasts) and the cellular infiltrate will be performed on a predefined area of each hemi-face/skull of 3 x3 cm at T0 (Inclusion) by Confocal Microscopy with a High Resolution Ultrasound (LC-OCT) and will be repeated at 6 and 12 months in 10 subjects The area will include at least one KA lesion, one lentigo lesion, and the peri-lesional healthy skin area.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
To evaluate the satisfaction of the subjects at 6 months (in hemi-face and/or skull), at 9 and 12 months (for the whole face and/or skull and in hemi-face and/or skull) regarding the use of a MRB 0.3 % serum
Subject satisfaction will be evaluated at 6 months on each hemi-face and/or hemi-skull and at 9 and 12 months on the whole face and/or skull and in hemi-face and/or skull via a satisfaction questionnaire (abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9).
Time frame: 6, 9 and 12 months
To evaluate the satisfaction of the subjects regardind galenic at 6 months (in hemi-face and/or skull), at 9 and 12 months (for the whole face and/or skull and in hemi-face and/or skull) regarding the use of the applied serums
Subject satisfaction will be evaluated at 6 months on each hemi-face and/or hemi-skull and at 9 and 12 months on the whole face and/or skull and in hemi-face and/or skull via a questionnaire on the galenic quality of the applied products (texture, ease of application, etc.).
Time frame: 6, 9 and 12 months
To evaluate the satisfaction of the investigator at 6, 9 and 12 months regarding the products used
The investigator's satisfaction with the products will be evaluated at 6 months on each hemi-face and/or hemi-skull and at 9 and 12 months on the whole face and/or skull on a 5-point scale: 1. = Very good effectiveness 2. = Good effectiveness 3. = Average effectiveness 4. = Poor effectiveness 5. = Not effective at all
Time frame: 6, 9 and 12 months
To evaluate subjects' compliance with serums application
Product compliance will be assessed during the visits by weighing the tubes of product collected.
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months