This is a randomized controlled trial to assess the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a multicomponent technology-supported care delivery intervention trial in 110 older patients with hematologic malignancies \[acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), multiple myeloma (MM), and diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)\] receiving outpatient chemotherapy on treatment-related toxicities, patient-reported outcomes, healthcare utilization, and inflammatory and epigenetic markers.
Compared to younger adults, older adults with cancer are more likely to have age-related vulnerabilities such as functional impairment and co-existing medical conditions. They are also often on many medications. As a result, older adults are more likely to experience treatment-related toxicities. These toxicities can lead to increased healthcare utilization (e.g., hospitalization, emergency room visits), decreased quality of life and functional status, and reduced survival. In addition, a disproportionate number of older adults live in rural areas which often limit access to healthcare. Therefore, there is a need to better support older adults with hematologic malignancies during the course of their treatment to decrease treatment-related toxicities so they can continue to receive treatment. The proposed study will investigate whether digital health technologies can support older adults in various aspects of their cancer care.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
M-Tech involves the use of a mobile app delivery platform to several interventions. The components of M-Tech include: 1) Hybrid in-person and telehealth visits with oncology providers; 2) Disease-specific education videos; 3) Activity level monitoring via a wearable device with promotion of physical activity; 4) Symptom monitoring with provision of self-management strategies, and 5) Medication management.
Participants randomized to the usual care arm will receive standard of care.
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
Difference between experimental and active comparator arms - Clinician-rated non-hematologic treatment-related toxicity
Measured using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events or CTCAE v5.0 and operationalized based on proportion of patients with grade 3-5 non-hematologic treatment-related toxicity for AML, MDS, and DLBCL or grade 2-5 non-hematologic treatment-related toxicity for MM
Time frame: 4-5 months
Retention rates
Percentage of patients/caregivers who completed baseline assessments and subsequently completed post-intervention assessments
Time frame: 4-5 months
Difference between experimental and active comparator arms - Healthcare Utilization
Healthcare utilization such as hospitalization and emergency room visits in the first 4-5 months will be collected from medical chart review. These will be presented as proportions and count.
Time frame: 4-5 months
Difference between experimental and active comparator arms - Quality of Life
Quality of life, measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-G) scale. It consists of 27 items divided into 4 subscales: physical well-being (PWB), social well-being (SWB), emotional well-being (EWB), and functional well-being (FWB). The score for each item ranges from 0-4. After reversing the scoring of negatively worded items, all the scores are summated. A higher score indicates better quality of life.
Time frame: 4-5 months
Difference between experimental and active comparator arms - Patient-reported treatment-related toxicity
Patient-reported treatment-related toxicity as measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE). We selected 22 symptoms commonly experienced by older adults with hematologic malignancies. Questions ask about frequency, severity, and interference with daily activities (each question has 5 response options). We will convert these response options to 0-5 and sum up the scores, higher score indicates worse severity and interference.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 4-5 months
Difference between experimental and active comparator arms - Functional Status
Functional status, measured using the instrumental activities of daily living subscale of the Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire: Older American Resources and Services (OARS). The IADL subscale consists of seven questions rated on a three-point Likert scale. It measures the degree to which an activity can be performed independently. A higher score indicates better functional status
Time frame: 4-5 months