This is a randomised controlled, adaptive, multicentre Phase II protocol evaluating different booster strategies in individuals aged 75 years and older already vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Part A of this trial foresees testing of different vaccines as a 3rd vaccination dose (first booster) for comparative assessment of their immunogenicity and safety against SARS-CoV-2 wild-type and variants in the elderly, a usually neglected population. Part B of this trial foresees testing of different vaccines as a 4th vaccination dose (second booster) for comparative assessment of their immunogenicity and safety against SARSCoV-2 wild-type and variants in the identical population.
Part A of the present trial in which individuals received a 3rd vaccination (first booster) of either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 was closed to further recruitment as of January 13, 2022. This was due to a change in vaccination policies, recommending a 3rd vaccination with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. Therefore, Part A was supplanted by Part B that investigated a 4th COVID-19 vaccination and started on 21 Jan 2022. The initial study protocol started the trial with Part A in which participants were randomized to a 3rd vaccination (first booster) with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273: Subjects who - prior to study entry - received a vaccination series of either BNT162b2 \& BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 \& mRNA-1273 or ChAdOx-1-S \& ChAdOx-1-S. For the reasons mentioned above, the study protocol was amended to continue the trial with Part B in which participants were randomized to a 4th vaccination (second booster) with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273: Subjects who - prior to study entry - received a vaccination series of either BNT162b2 \& BNT162b2 \& BNT162b2 or BNT162b2 \& BNT162b2 \& mRNA-1273 or mRNA-1273 \& mRNA-1273 \& mRNA-1273 or mRNA-1273 \& mRNA-1273 \& BNT162b2 or ChAdOx-1-S \& ChAdOx-1-S \& BNT162b2 or ChAdOx-1-S \& ChAdOx-1-S \& mRNA-1273.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
323
Single booster shot (3rd dose in Part A and 4th dose in Part B)
Single booster shot (3rd dose in Part A and 4th dose in Part B)
University Hospital Cologne
Cologne, Germany
University Hospital Frankfurt
Frankfurt, Germany
Hannover Medical School Hospital
Hanover, Germany
Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos
Vilnius, Lithuania
Helse Bergen HF, Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, Norway
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Spain
Reina Sofia University Hospital
Córdoba, Spain
La Paz University Hospital
Madrid, Spain
Biodonostia Health Research Institute
San Sebastián, Spain
Antibody Titre Increase 14 Days After Study Vaccination Dose.
Rate of 2-fold antibody titre increase 14 days after 3rd (Part A) or 4th vaccination dose (Part B) measured by qualitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Anti-RBD-ELISA) against wildtype virus.
Time frame: From Day 0 until Day 14
Change in Neutralizing Antibody Titre Against Wild-type 14 Days After Study Vaccination Dose
Change in neutralizing antibody titre (Virus Neutralisation Assay) against wild-type 14 days after a 3rd (Part A) or 4th vaccination dose (Part B), to be determined in a subgroup only. Microneutralization assay results were proposed to be reported as "change in neutralizing antibody titre (Virus Neutralisation Assay)" in the trial protocol. However, as the pandemic progressed, the need arose to assess neutralization against different variants. In our stud(ies), we evaluated not only the Wuhan strain but also 25 distinct variants of concern (VoCs) and/or variants of interest (VoIs). For VoCs and VoIs, expressing results as "change in neutralization capacity expressed as a percentage (%)" is more effective as it illustrates the impact of mutations on neutralization, thereby allowing cross-variant comparisons. This adjustment did not alter the suggested endpoint, as both reporting methods reflect the ability of patients' antibodies neutralizing capacities.
Time frame: From Day 0 until Day 14
Change in Neutralizing Antibody Titre Against Variants of Concern 14 Days After Study Vaccination Dose
Change in neutralizing antibody titre (Virus Neutralisation Assay) against variants of concern 14 days after a 3rd (Part A) or 4th vaccination dose (Part B), to be determined in a subgroup only. Microneutralization assay results were proposed to be reported as "change in neutralizing antibody titre (Virus Neutralisation Assay)" in the trial protocol. However, as the pandemic progressed, the need arose to assess neutralization against different variants. In our stud(ies), we evaluated not only the Wuhan strain but also 25 distinct variants of concern (VoCs) and/or variants of interest (VoIs). For VoCs and VoIs, expressing results as "change in neutralization capacity expressed as a percentage (%)" is more effective as it illustrates the impact of mutations on neutralization, thereby allowing cross-variant comparisons. This adjustment did not alter the suggested endpoint, as both reporting methods reflect the ability of patients' antibodies neutralizing capacities.
Time frame: From Day 0 until Day 14
Antibody Titre Level at 12 Months After a Study Vaccination Dose
Antibody titre level at 12 months after a 3rd (Part A) or 4th vaccination dose (Part B) measured by a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (anti-RBD-ELISA assay).
Time frame: From Day 0 until Month 12
Neutralizing Antibody Titre Against Wild-type at 12 Months After Study Vaccination Dose
Neutralizing antibody titre (Virus Neutralisation Assay) against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 at 12 months after a 3rd (Part A) or 4th vaccination dose (Part B), to be determined in a subgroup only. Microneutralization assay results were proposed to be reported as "change in neutralizing antibody titre (Virus Neutralisation Assay)" in the trial protocol. However, as the pandemic progressed, the need arose to assess neutralization against different variants. In our stud(ies), we evaluated not only the Wuhan strain but also 25 distinct variants of concern (VoCs) and/or variants of interest (VoIs). For VoCs and VoIs, expressing results as "change in neutralization capacity expressed as a percentage (%)" is more effective as it illustrates the impact of mutations on neutralization, thereby allowing cross-variant comparisons. This adjustment did not alter the suggested endpoint, as both reporting methods reflect the ability of patients' antibodies neutralizing capacities.
Time frame: From Day 0 until Month 12
Neutralizing Antibody Titre Against Variants of Concern at 12 Months After Study Vaccination Dose
Neutralizing antibody titre (Virus Neutralisation Assay) against variants of concern at 12 months after a 3rd (Part A) or 4th vaccination dose (Part B), to be determined in a subgroup only. Microneutralization assay results were proposed to be reported as "change in neutralizing antibody titre (Virus Neutralisation Assay)" in the trial protocol. However, as the pandemic progressed, the need arose to assess neutralization against different variants. In our stud(ies), we evaluated not only the Wuhan strain but also 25 distinct variants of concern (VoCs) and/or variants of interest (VoIs). For VoCs and VoIs, expressing results as "change in neutralization capacity expressed as a percentage (%)" is more effective as it illustrates the impact of mutations on neutralization, thereby allowing cross-variant comparisons. This adjustment did not alter the suggested endpoint, as both reporting methods reflect the ability of patients' antibodies neutralizing capacities.
Time frame: From Day 0 until Month 12
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.