Background: Emerging data favors aortic blood pressure (BP) over brachial cuff BP in predicting CV and renal complications, as this BP directly impacts the heart, brain and kidneys. In parallel, central BP measuring devices have been developed that are more accurate towards aortic BP and easy to use without training. In no other condition than advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is BP control as important, since undertreatment is associated with adverse CV events and progression towards end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), while overtreatment similarly leads to adverse CV events and injurious falls but also acute kidney injury which can precipitate ESKD. To this day, standard BP management relies on brachial cuff BP, which is an imprecise surrogate marker of aortic BP, more so in the advanced CKD population. Considering that these patients have a high risk of CV morbidity and mortality and is a group where brachial BP may be the least reliable, it can be beneficial to manage hypertension in this population using central BP measurements. With the development of affordable and easy to use central BP devices, routine use of central BP in hypertension would now become a reality. However, the superiority of central BP to traditional brachial cuff BP in regard to clinical outcomes will first need to be demonstrated. Objectives: To demonstrate that targeting central BP in advanced CKD patients as opposed to brachial cuff BP is feasible and results in lower arterial stiffness after 12 months of follow-up. Methods: The CENTRAL-CKD trial is an investigator-initiated prospective parallel-group 1:1 randomized double-blinded multicenter pragmatic pilot trial. Patients with CKD stages 4 and 5 (n=116) will be randomized to either a central systolic BP target \< 130 mmHg (intervention) or brachial systolic BP target \< 130 mmHg (standard care). Central and brachial BP will be concomitantly measured, with treating physicians, patients and investigators blinded towards allocation. As this trial is of a pragmatic design, all other aspects of BP and CKD management, including anti-hypertensive treatment-related decisions, diastolic BP targets, and clinical and laboratory follow-ups will be at the discretion of the attending Nephrologist. The primary outcomes include feasibility of large-scale trial using prespecified criteria and aortic stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity) at 12 months. Other cardiovascular, renal, quality of life and safety outcomes will be evaluated. Importance: CENTRAL-CKD is designed as a pilot trial aimed at providing the framework and justification to proceed to a large-scale trial with adequate power to detect the impact of the proposed intervention on clinically important outcomes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
116
Participants will be randomized to either a central BP target (intervention) or a brachial BP target (standard care). For each group, the source of the BP (central or brachial) will be blinded and only the BP values will be provided to the attending Nephrologist. In both cases, the target SBP will be \<130 mmHg.
Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Feasibility: Consent rate
Proportion of participants who provide consent relative to the number approached for participation. Feasibility criteria (No / Probable / Yes): \<30% / 30-60% / \>60%
Time frame: Baseline
Feasibility: Recruitment rate
Proportion of randomized participants relative to the number of screened participants. Feasibility criteria (No / Probable / Yes): \<40% / 40-80% / \>80%
Time frame: Baseline
Feasibility: Achieved BP target rate
Proportion of randomized participants who achieve BP target at 12 months Feasibility criteria (No / Probable / Yes): \<30% / 30-60% / \>60%
Time frame: 12 months
Feasibility: Completion rate
Proportion of randomized participants who complete the trial Feasibility criteria (No / Probable / Yes): \<40% / 40-80% / \>80%
Time frame: 12 months
Feasibility: Recruitment pace
Number of participants recruited after 24 months of activation for all sites Feasibility criteria (No / Probable / Yes): \<54 / 54-81 / \>81
Time frame: 12 months after activation of last site
Feasibility: Divergent treatment decision rate
Proportion of divergent treatment decision based on central BP compared to brachial BP Feasibility criteria (No / Probable / Yes): \<10% / 10-30% / \>30%
Time frame: 12 months
Feasibility: Therapeutic inertia rate
Proportion of therapeutic inertia Feasibility criteria (No / Probable / Yes): \>60% / 60-30% / \<30%
Time frame: 12 months
Difference in aortic stiffness
Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity
Time frame: 12 months
Difference in eGFR decline
Time frame: 12 months
Change in albuminuria
Time frame: 12 months
Difference in Daily Defined Doses of blood pressure drugs
Time frame: 12 months
Quality of life (KDQOL-SF questionnaire)
Score 0 to 100. Higher score represents better quality of life
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.