With this prospective, randomized, multicentre, parallel group pragmatic non-inferiority trial, the investigators will evaluate if endoscopy-driven introduction of biological therapy is not leading to more postoperative endoscopic recurrence at week 86 compared to systematic prophylactic biological therapy in patients with CD undergoing an ileocolonic resection with ileocolonic anastomosis. Secondary analyses will include influence on clinical, biological and surgical CD recurrence, serious adverse events, direct costs, work productivity, and quality of life. If the investigators can demonstrate the non-inferiority of an endoscopy-driven approach, this patient-tailored management could be advocated, while a more expensive systematic introduction of biological therapies could be limited. Finally, endoscopic images provided through the SOPRANO CD study, will be used to develop a new scoring system evaluating postoperative endoscopic recurrence.
This will be a prospective, randomized, parallel group, pragmatic trial. Prior to study group assignment, the type of biological therapy to be (eventually) used in the postoperative phase will be selected by the treating physician after thorough discussion with the patient. The use of cheaper anti-TNF biosimilars will be encouraged, but patients who received adalimumab and/or infliximab preoperatively cannot receive the same treatment again in SOPRANO CD if the participants previously encountered immunogenicity issues to this treatment. Systematic postoperative prophylaxis with a biological: Biological therapy (adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, vedolizumab or risankizumab) will be initiated within 14 to 40 days after ileocolonic resection or restoration of the faecal stream (day 0). In patients with both Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) based clinical recurrence (HBI \>4) and endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts score ≥i2b) at week 30, biological therapy will be optimized (reimbursed or through the available free goods / samples programs). Beyond week 32 optimization of this biological therapy will be allowed following daily clinical practice including proactive therapeutic drug monitoring. However, the timing, type and reason for dose optimization should be recorded. Endoscopy-driven postoperative biological therapy: No CD related therapy will be administered between Baseline (14 to 40 days after ileocolonic resection or restoration of the faecal stream) and the endoscopic evaluation at week 30 Patients with endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts score ≥i2b) at week 30 will initiate biological therapy (adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, vedolizumab or risankizumab) following a classical induction and maintenance schedule. The type of biological therapy has to be decided already in the perioperative phase to allow a proper stratification. In patients initiating biological therapy at week 30, this therapy maybe optimized from week 32 onwards following daily clinical practice including proactive therapeutic drug monitoring. However, the timing, type and reason for dose optimization should be recorded. In patients not on biological therapy yet but developing clinical recurrence (HBI \>4) with objective signs of disease recurrence (faecal calprotectin \>250 µg/g, C-reactive protein \>5 mg/L or endoscopic recurrence ≥i2b or clear radiological disease activity at the neo-terminal ileum) beyond week 32, biological therapy can be initiated, but this will be regarded as a study failure. Randomization: Eligible patients will be allocated to one of the two treatment arms (1:1) according to a computer generated randomisation list in REDCap. Stratified randomisation will be performed to achieve approximate balance for: * Type of selected postoperative prophylactic therapy: adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, vedolizumab or risankizumab. * Number of risk factors for postoperative recurrence: 1, 2 or \>2 (out of 5 predefined factors: active smoking, penetrating disease, previous ileocolonic resection ≤10 years of index surgery, ≥2 previous ileocolonic resections, biological therapy ≤3 months of index ileocolonic resection)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
292
Biological therapy used in daily clinical practice in patients with Crohn's disease to prevent disease recurrence
GZA
Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
RECRUITINGUZA
Edegem, Antwerpen, Belgium
RECRUITINGErasmus ziekenhuis
Brussels, Brussels Capital, Belgium
RECRUITINGCliniques Universitaires Saint Luc
Brussels, Brussels Capital, Belgium
RECRUITINGUZ Brussel
Jette, Brussels Capital, Belgium
RECRUITINGCHwapi
Tournai, Henegouwen, Belgium
RECRUITINGZOL Genk
Genk, Limburg, Belgium
RECRUITINGCHC Montlégia
Liège, Liège, Belgium
RECRUITINGCHU de Liège
Liège, Liège, Belgium
RECRUITINGCHU UCL Namur site Godinne
Yvoir, Namur, Belgium
NOT_YET_RECRUITING...and 18 more locations
postoperative endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts score ≥i2b)
To compare the postoperative endoscopic recurrence rate in patients with Crohn's disease undergoing an ileocolonic resection with ileocolonic anastomosis randomized to systematic biological therapy or endoscopy-driven biological therapy
Time frame: 86 weeks
need for unscheduled treatment adaptation prior to week 86
When, due to clinical symptoms, therapy needs to be started or switched prior to week 86
Time frame: 86 weeks
Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) based clinical recurrence
HBI based clinical recurrence (score higher than 4) prior to week 86. HBI based clinical recurrence is defined as HBI \>4; AND objective signs of disease recurrence, namely faecal calprotectin \>250 µg/g, CRP \>5 mg/L, or endoscopic recurrence Rutgeerts score ≥i2b, or clear radiological disease activity at the neo-terminal ileum.
Time frame: 86 weeks
Direct costs
Direct costs from Baseline to week 86
Time frame: 86 weeks
new ileocolonic resection
Need for a new ileocolonic resection prior to week 86
Time frame: 86 weeks
Severe adverse reactions
Severe adverse reactions to biological therapy prior to week 86
Time frame: 86 weeks
Serious adverse events
Serious adverse events prior to week 86
Time frame: 86 weeks
European Quality of Live Five Dimension Five Level Scale
Quality of life at week 30, week 62 and week 86 in comparison to Baseline (score between 0 and 100; higher score, better quality of life)
Time frame: 86 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.