This study is a double-blinded randomized study examining the effectiveness of the multi-target magnetic stimulation treatment on Freezing of Gait (FOG) phenomenon in patients with Parkinson's disease. We hypothesize that treatment using magnetic stimulation on motor cortex combined with spinal cord will improve FOG and gait symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Patients in the Experimental group underwent ten sessions of double active magnetic stimulation with low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the bilateral primary motor cortex of the lower leg followed by low frequency repetitive magnetic stimulation over the spinal cord, whereas patients in the Active Comparator group underwent ten sessions of single active magnetic stimulation with low frequency rTMS over the bilateral primary motor cortex of the lower leg. In addition, patients in the Sham Comparator group underwent 10 sessions of double sham rTMS on motor cortex and spinal cord. Assessments of FOG, gait function, motor symptoms and excitability of primary motor cortex motor were performed three times: at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
57
For Experimental Arm, active magnetic stimulation on motor cortex followed by active magnetic stimulation on spinal cord, patients underwent ten sessions of double active magnetic stimulation with low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the bilateral primary motor cortex of the lower leg followed by low frequency repetitive magnetic stimulation over the spinal cord. For Active Comparator Arm, active magnetic stimulation on motor cortex followed by sham magnetic stimulation on spinal cord. For Sham Comparator Arm, sham magnetic stimulation on motor cortex followed by sham magnetic stimulation on spinal cord.
the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
RECRUITINGChanges of Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q)
The Freezing of Gait questionnaire will be used to quantify the frequency and severity of this symptom. The score will be compared to the baseline. The minimum and maximum values of the FOG-Q are 0 and 24. A higher FOG-Q score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention
The motor part of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
The measure mainly reflects the overall severity of Parkinson's disease motor symptoms. The minimum and maximum values of the motor part of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale are 0 and 108. A higher score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention
Gait speed
Gait speed (m/s) was evaluated at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention using a portable Inertial Measurement Unit system during a 5-m timed Up-and-Go (TUG) test.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention
Stride length
Stride length (cm) was evaluated at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention using a portable Inertial Measurement Unit system during a 5-m timed Up-and-Go (TUG) test.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention
Stride time variability
Stride time variability (%) was evaluated at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention using a portable Inertial Measurement Unit system during a 5-m timed Up-and-Go (TUG) test. Stride time variability was expressed as coefficient of variation \[CV\].
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Double support
Double support (%) was evaluated at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention using a portable Inertial Measurement Unit system during a 5-m timed Up-and-Go (TUG) test.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention, one month post intervention
Resting motor threshold (RMT)
RMT (% TMS output intensity) is defined as the lowest intensity required to elicit MEPs of \> 50 μV in at least 5 of 10 consecutive trials while the target muscle is relaxed. RMT was determined to be the nearest 1% of the maximum stimulator output.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention.
MEP amplitude at 120% RMT intensity (AMP)
Five single stimuli were delivered to the optimal stimulation point at an intensity of 120% of RMT, and the mean peak-to-peak amplitude of the MEPs was calculated, which is the AMP (mV).
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention.
Cortical silent period (CSP)
The CSP (ms) is measured through electromyographic signal recording (EMG) on a target muscle and refers to the period of EMG silence following the elicitation of a motor-evoked potential (MEP) through a single TMS pulse delivered over the contralateral primary motor cortex. Individuals were asked to actively contract abductor pollicis brevis (APB) with 20% of the maximum force, while a single pulse with 150% of RMT was applied to the opposite primary motor cortex. We recorded the time from pulse outputting to the recovery of inhibited active contraction as CSP. The above protocol was repeated ten times, and the average value of CSP was calculated.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention.
Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI)
SICI was assessed with a subthreshold conditioning stimulus (80% RMT) and a supra-threshold test stimulus (1 mV MEP) with a 4ms interstimulus interval between conditioning and test stimuli. Ten trials were acquired for each interstimulus interval. SICI was expressed as the percentage ratio between the test and conditioning MEP.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention.
Intracortical facilitation (ICF)
ICF was assessed with a subthreshold conditioning stimulus (80% RMT) and a supra-threshold test stimulus (1 mV MEP) with a 15 ms interstimulus interval between conditioning and test stimuli. Ten trials were acquired for each interstimulus interval. ICF was expressed as the percentage ratio between the test and conditioning MEP.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, one day post intervention.