To compare the efficacy and safety of NPB-01 in patients with autoimmune encephalitis refractory to steroid pulse therapy using steroid pulse therapy as a control.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
40
Trial site 1
Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
RECRUITINGProportion of responders in CASE (Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis)
A responder is defined as a patient whose CASE score at Week 4 of the post-treatment follow-up period after treatment with investigational product improved by 40% or more compared to the pre-treatment period.
Time frame: 4 weeks
CASE
The change in CASE score at each time point after the start of treatment with investigational product compared with that on Day 8 of the pretreatment period will be compared between the arms. Changes in CASE scores divided into three segments (0 -4: excellent, 5 -9: moderate, 10 -27: poor) will also be compared. In addition, the period until CASE score becomes 4 points or less after the start of treatment with investigational product will be checked.
Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 weeks
mRS
Changes in mRS at each time point after the start of investigational product treatment compared with Day 8 of the pretreatment period will be compared between the arms.
Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 weeks
GCS
To compare the change in GCS at each time point after the start of investigational product with that on Day 8 of the pretreatment period between the arms.
Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 weeks
MMSE-J
The change in MMSE-J at each time point after the start of investigational product as compared with Day 8 of the pretreatment period will be compared between the arms.
Time frame: 4, 8, 12 weeks
FAB
The change in FAB at each time point after the start of investigational product as compared with Day 8 of the pretreatment period will be compared between the arms.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 4, 8, 12 weeks
Disappearance of abnormal EEG findings
The proportion of subjects in whom abnormal findings in EEG disappeared at each time point after the start of investigational product as compared with Day 8 of the pretreatment period will be compared between the arms.
Time frame: 4, 12 weeks
Disappearance of abnormal head MRI findings
The proportion of subjects in whom abnormal findings in head MRI disappeared at each time point after the start of investigational product as compared with Day 8 of the pretreatment period will be compared between the arms.
Time frame: 4, 12 weeks
Cerebrospinal fluid test
The proportion of subjects in whom the cell count returned to within the reference range (≤ 5/μl) and the proportion of subjects in whom the protein count returned to within the reference range (15.0 \~ 45.0 mg/dL) at each time point after the start of investigational product treatment as compared with Day 8 of the pretreatment period will be checked.
Time frame: 4, 12 weeks
Duration of hospitalization
Duration of hospitalization after the start of treatment with investigational product to be compared between the arms.
Time frame: 12 weeks
mRS proportion
The proportions of subjects with an mRS score of ≤ 2, subjects with an improvement of ≥ 1 point, and subjects with an improvement of ≥ 2 points will also be compared. Also, the time to mRS improvement after the start of treatment with investigational product (≤ 2 points, ≥ 1 point improvement, ≥ 2 points improvement) .
Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 weeks
GCS proportion
Changes in GCS when divided into three segments (15-13: Mild, 12-9: Moderate, 8-3: Severe) will also be compared. In addition, the period until the GCS score reaches 13 or higher after the start of treatment with investigational product will be checked.
Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 weeks