Sepsis is a life-threatening reaction to an infection. It happens when the immune system overreacts to an infection and starts to damage the body's tissues and organs. The aim of this research study is to compare the two different ways to treat sepsis, in the early phase of treatment immediately after the participants arrive in hospital. The standard approach is to give a salt solution fluid through a drip in the participants arm to start with, then adding in a medication that increases the blood flow to the participants vital organs (a vasopressor mediation called norepinephrine) if required. The alternative approach is to start the vasopressor medication immediately, and then add in extra salt solution fluid via a drip if required. Vasopressors work by increasing the blood pressure which allows a better blood flow to the internal organs. The investigators plan to see which approach is better and to see if they have a role in improving a patient's recovery time, reducing complications, the length of time they stay in hospital and longer term poor health. Based on research that has already been done, the investigators believe treating patients with vasopressors when they arrive in the Emergency Department, may have potential advantages over the standard fluids used today. However, the evidence is not clear and that is why this research is being done.
Sepsis results from overwhelming reactions to microbial infections where the immune system initiates dysregulated responses that lead to remote organ dysfunction, shock and ultimately death. Sepsis remains a significant global issue - as well as direct mortality, survivors suffer long term reductions in patient centred outcomes, with reduced quality of life and functional status. Patients with hypotension and organ hypoperfusion as a result of sepsis have poorer outcomes by dysregulated inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, immune suppression, and organ dysfunction. Current guidelines highlight the importance of early fluid resuscitation, but the association of early fluid therapy with improved outcomes is unclear. In the resuscitation phase, current practice is to give intravenous (IV) fluid and intermittent vasopressor boluses if required, before, for some patients, continuous vasopressor infusion via a central venous line in Intensive Care (ICU). An alternative, early continuous peripheral vasopressor infusion (PVI) is not routine practice in the UK. Current practice in the UK is guided by NICE Sepsis guidance and the international Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) consensus recommendations. Both specify intravenous fluid administration as a central tenet of early resuscitation of patients with septic shock, with intravenous vasopressor administration recommended after intravenous fluid resuscitation. NICE recommend boluses of 500ml of crystalloid and "refer to critical care for review of management including need for central venous access and initiation of vasopressors". SSC recommend 30ml/kg crystalloid in first hour, followed by vasopressors to maintain MAP\>65. The current NICE fluid resuscitation guideline, November 2020, continues to emphasise 500ml boluses of crystalloid as usual care. A recent international survey of 100 critical care and EM physicians regarding intravenous fluid resuscitation practice, confirmed that an initial bolus of 1000ml of crystalloid, followed by 500ml boluses of crystalloid remained the most common management strategy for the initial treatment of septic shock. This persisted despite the lack of benefit demonstrated in three landmark trials of protocolised sepsis management. In recent years, there has been increasing acceptance of peripheral administration of norepinephrine, based on evidence of safety and efficacy. The Intensive Care Society published guidance on peripheral vasopressor infusion in November 2020. We have recently conducted a survey amongst ED and ICU clinicians in the UK regarding attitudes and current practice related to the use of intravenous peripheral vasopressors. Eighty two respondents provided the following answers 1. Experience of use of any intravenous vasopressor in ED was high (81%); 2. Exclusive PVI made up 23% of all vasopressor use in ED; 3. Norepinephrine (norepinephrine) was the most common vasopressor (54%); 4. Barriers to PVI were local protocols and an appropriate level of care in the destination ward for a patient on vasopressor infusion.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1,006
Norepinepherine should be prepared and delivered at a concentration of 16 micrograms/ml
IV fluids administered as per standard care
Aintree University Hospital
Aintree, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGRoyal Blackburn Hospital
Blackburn, United Kingdom
TERMINATEDFairfield General Hospital
Bury, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGAddenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge
Cambridge, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGRoyal Derby Hospital
Derby, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGRoyal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGVictoria Hospital
Fife Keith, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGGlasgow Royal Infirmary
Glasgow, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGQueen Elizabeth University Hospital
Glasgow, United Kingdom
RECRUITINGHull Royal Infirmary
Hull, United Kingdom
RECRUITING...and 15 more locations
The primary objective is to determine whether early PVI (within 12 hours of admission) targeted to MAP of ≥65 mmHg improves clinical effectiveness in hospitalised adult patients with septic shock compared with usual care, in the first 48 hours.
The primary objective is measured by the Primary outcome of 'Days Alive and Out of Hospital at 90 Days'.
Time frame: 90 days post randomisation
Accumulated Total Volume of IV fluid
Accumulated volume of IV fluid delivered in each arm - excluding fluid volumes less than 100ml
Time frame: 6,12, 24, 48 and 72 hours post randomisation
Lactate clearance from baseline
Blood lactate value - arterial or venous
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 48 & 72 hours post randomisation
Total Dose of Norepinephrine
Total dose of norepinephrine delivered by any route (peripheral or central) at each timepoint
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours post randomisation
Proportion of patients who receive vasopressors
Proportion of patients recruited to control arm who receive any vasopressor (norepinephrine, vasopressin, metarminol, epinephrine) at each time point
Time frame: 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after recruitment to the control arm
Proportion of patients who require central venous access
Decision to treat based on treating clinician judgement
Time frame: 24 and 48 hours post randomisation
Proportion of patients developing acute kidney injury
Acute kidney injury in line with the (p) RIFLE (paediatric Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End stage renal disease, AKIN (Acute kidney injury network) or KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) definitions by using any of the following criteria * a rise in serum creatinine of 26 micromol/litre or greater within 48 hours * a 50% or greater rise in serum creatinine known or presumed to have occurred within the past 7 days * a fall in urine output to less than 0.5 ml/kg/hour for more than 6 hours in adults
Time frame: During the first 72 hours post randomisation
Proportion of patients receiving parenteral corticosteroid
defined as new prescription of parenteral corticosteroid
Time frame: 24, 48 & 72 hours post randomisation
Length of hospital stay for index admission
index hospital admission ends when the patient is discharged from the facility providing definitive treatment for the episode of sepsis leading to inclusion in the study
Time frame: up to hospital discharge
Proportion of participants needing renal replacement therapy during index hospital admission
decision to treat based on treating clinician judgement; participants who receive new renal replacement therapy; participants with chronic renal replacement initiated prior to the index admission will not be eligible to meet this endpoint
Time frame: index admission
Proportion of participants needing non-invasive ventilation during index hospital admission
decision to treat based on treating clinician judgement; defined as admissions receiving mask/hood CPAP or mask/hood BiPAP or non-invasive ventilation; admissions receiving CPAP via a tracheostomy
Time frame: index admission
Proportion of participants needing advanced respiratory support (ICNARC definition)
decision to treat based on treating clinician judgement; Patients who receive one or more of the following: A. Patients who receive invasive mechanical ventilation via endotracheal or tracheostomy tube, except those intubated solely for a procedure and extubated within 24 hours B. BiPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure) applied via a trans-laryngeal tracheal tube or applied via a tracheostomy C. CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) via a translaryngeal tune of applied via a tracheostomy D. extracorporeal respiratory support
Time frame: index admission
Total dose of other vasopressor
Total dose of other vasopressors delivered by any route (peripheral or central) at each timepoint
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours post randomisation
All-cause mortality during index hospital admission and at 30 and 90 days
All-cause mortality during index hospital admission and at 30 \& 90 days post randomisation
Time frame: index admission and at 30 & 90 days post randomisation
Readmission, post initial hospital discharge, in first 30 days and 90 days post randomisation
Re-admission to an acute healthcare facility in the first 30 \& 90 days post randomisation, following a discharge from the index hospital admission to the participants care setting in the community. This includes planned and unplanned admissions. For both readmission outcomes, an acute care facility is any acute care hospital, emergency department admission \>24 hours, critical care area or short stay admission or observation area.
Time frame: 30 & 90 days post randomisation
Proportion of participants admitted to and length of stay in critical care (level 2 or 3) during index hospital admission
Proportion of participants admitted to and length of stay in critical care (level 2 or 3) during index hospital admission
Time frame: During Index Hospital Admission
Discharge Diagnosis
Main diagnosis for index hospital admission, and all subsequent re-admissions
Time frame: At initial Index Hospital Discharge & at any subsequent hospital discharges following any re-admissions (post Initial Index Hospital Discharge) 90 days post randomisation.
HRQoL
Derived from EQ-5D-5L index values
Time frame: Baseline, 30 & 90 Days Post randomisation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.