The PRECISION-study offers a non-invasive, curative intervention for drug-resistant localised epilepsy patients who are not eligible for surgery. The intervention will consist of a single LINAC based SRT treatment and is given by the radiation-oncologist after detailed localisation of the epileptogenic zone with the neurologist, radiologist and neurosurgeon. This intervention will make curative-intent treatment possible where this could otherwise not be given and is a non-invasive and non-competitive alternative to epilepsy surgery. It is expected that the health costs for this curative treatment will not exceed standard treatment, such as lifelong medication and neuromodulation.
In this PRECISION-study including adult patients with drug-resistant, localised epilepsy, not eligible for surgery, we offer non-invasive linear accelerator (LINAC) based Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT) with curative intent. SRT and stereotactic radio-surgery (SRS) have been used to treat several types of neoplasms in the brain for several decades. Several publications (level 2 evidence) have shown the potential value of SRT in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, however no level-1 evidence was given enabling guideline development. A recent systematic review from our institution has shown that SRT resulted in a significant seizure cure or reduction in 58% of the 170 included patients, within 2 years after treatment. Interestingly, the ROSE trial, randomising between open surgery and SRT, has demonstrated a seizure remission of 52% in the radiotherapy group after 2 years with the proportion of seizure-free patients still increasing with a longer follow-up up to 74% after 3 years. Therefore, SRT may be considered a curative treatment for drug resistant localised epilepsy. Currently, randomized controlled SRT epilepsy trials are lacking and there is a need for high quality evidence, so SRT can be clinically implemented for localised drug-resistant epilepsy patients in the Netherlands as well. The PRECISION-study is a randomised waitlist-controlled trial in which SRT is the intervention and AED continuation and neuromodulation are the standard treatment with a 1:1 randomization. After 2-year follow up the waitlist-control group, patients are offered the intervention (optional). We hypothesize that SRT alters the epileptogenic cerebral tissue to yield a reduction in seizures and possibly cure after 2 years, with a significant increase in the patients' quality of life.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
94
Target definition: the target volume is defined as the epileptogenic zone (EZ) on all (non) invasive examinations (e.g. 3, 7 Tesla MRI or Stereo-EEG) of the presurgical path. Planning target volume (PTV) = GTV. A single fraction SRT with a prescribed isotoxic dose of 24 Gy to the 100% surrounding isodose. Dose is depending on the proximity and maximum tolerable dose to the radiosensitive organs at risk and EZ volume resulting in a V12\<= 10 cc reducing the risk on radionecrosis.
Maastricht Radiation Oncology
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Radiotherapy adapted Engel classification (RAEC) is I, II or III
Radiotherapy adapted Engel classification (RAEC). For analysis of outcomes in the incidence of seizures, we use in this study the Engel classification, adapted for radiotherapy. This includes four classes: class I - seizure free, class II - rarely seizures, class III improved, more than 75% IV- no significant improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year and 5 year after treatment
Seizure frequency
self-reports and reports from caretakers, combined in a digital diary.
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year and 5 year after treatment
Seizure-free days
self-reports and reports from caretakers, combined in a digital diary.
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year and 5 year after treatment
Type of epilepsy
self-reports and reports from caretakers, combined in a digital diary.
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year and 5 year after treatment
EQ-5D 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L)
EQ-5D-5L is comprised of a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale. The descriptive system measures quality of life along five dimensions, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, with five levels for each dimension from which subjects are asked to select one. There are 5 questions and 5 qualitative answers plus a numerical scale (from 0 to 100) related with the general health status. We will attribute a numerical value to the 5 qualitative answers (100 for the best/ 75, 50, 25 and 0 for the worse).
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year and 5 year after treatment
The Assessment of Quality of Life-8 Dimensions Score (AQoL-8D Score)
The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) measure of health-related Quality of Life. AQoL-8D covers dimensions of Independent Living, Happiness, Mental Health Coping, Relationships, Self-Worth, Pain, and Senses. Items are scored from 0 to 3. Scores range from 0 to 45 with higher scores indicating poorer quality of life
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year and 5 year after treatment
Quality of life in Epilepsy-31 Inventory (QOLIE-31)
The QOLIE includes 31 questions about health and daily activities. Responses are given on a range of scales. Responses are coded to 0 to 100 point scales where higher scores indicate better quality of life. The final score is the average of scores for the individual items. QOLIE-31 is a widely used epilepsy-specific questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year and 5 year after treatment
'Cost-effectiveness Resource use' is measured with iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ)
Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA) Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ). The iPCQ is a standardized instrument for measuring and valuing health related productivity losses. This wil be used for the cost effectiveness analysis.
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year and 5 year after treatment
'Cost-effectiveness Resource use' is measured with iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ)
Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA) Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ). The iMCQ is a standardized instrument for measuring medical costs. The aim of the iVICQ is to facilitate and promote an accurate description of providing informal care, its effects on informal caregivers, and how such effects are included in economic evaluations of health care interventions.
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year and 5 year after treatment
'Informal care' is meausured with iMTA Valuation of Informal Care Questionnaire (iVICQ)
Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA) Valuation of Informal Care Questionnaire (iVICQ). The aim of this standardized instrument is to facilitate and promote an accurate description of providing informal care, its effects on informal caregivers, and how such effects are included in economic evaluations of health care interventions.
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year and 5 year after treatment
'Patients' experiences' are measured with the instrument 'Patient Reported Experience Measures Medical Specialtic Care' (PREM MSZ) Medical Specialistic Care (PREM MSZ)
PREM MSZ is a Dutch standardized questionnaire to report Patient Reported Experience. Instrument is developed by NIVEL (Dutch Institute for Healthcare Research) in collabaration with Dutch healcare insurers. Instrument includes 13 questions about the satisfaction with the communication between the patient and the caregiver, shared decision making, trust in the expertise of the physician, the effect of the treatment. Responses to these questions are coded into 0 to 10 points. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with care. In the questionnaire patients are also asked for the evaluation of their own health, recommendations to improve care, and if they would recommend the care to other patients with the same health problem. Finally there are some questions about background variables (age, gender, education)
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year and 5 year after treatment
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.