Clinical Significance of Subclinical Myocardial Involvement in Recovered COVID-19 Patients Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Overview

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains a major health issue resulting in \>800,000 deaths as of 30th August 2020. A concerning discovery of COVID-19 is the involvement of the myocardium. Several case studies including one from our group (recent study publication in JACC Cardiovascular Imaging led by the principal investigator of this grant application) have demonstrated subclinical myocardial inflammation in patients using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) who have recovered from COVID-19. Furthermore at a cellular level, a recent autopsy study indicated that the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 is present in the myocardial tissue. The study further described invasion and viral progeny occurring in the myocardial interstitial cells and as such is a concerning development with the longer-term implications being unknown. These concerns have been noticed by the cardiology and non-cardiology medical community, with some expressing concerns of a new cause for cardiomyopathy and heart failure secondary to COVID-195. Therefore, it is critical that further studies are conducted to determine the longer-term outcome for patients.

COVID-19 Cardiovascular Complications: So far, COVID-19 has been linked to myocarditis, myocardial infarction, thrombosis/ hypercoaguable state and reduced cardiac function. At an early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, it became apparent that cardiac complications were quite prevalent in COVID-19 patients, with a study from Wuhan showing 28% of patients having raised troponin levels and that raised troponin levels were correlated with poor outcome including death. In three case series using CMR to evaluate patients, the prevalence of myocardial infarcts ranged from 0% to 12%, myocardial inflammation was present in 56% to 60% of patients and reduced LV function was present in up to 7% of patients. Role of CMR Imaging in COVID-19: CMR is unique amongst the cardiac imaging modalities in providing a comprehensive evaluation of the heart structure, function and tissue characterisation. The European Society of Cardiology recognises CMR as the gold standard for assessing cardiac systolic function and volumes due to the high reproducibility between observers. Thus it allows for differences in cardiac systolic function and volumes to be detected earlier and with smaller sample sizes compared to echocardiography. CMR's tissue characterisation capabilities are unavailable to other modalities, and does not require ionising radiation or radioactive tracers (unlike computed tomography or nuclear imaging), which is ideal for follow-up testing. It has multiple techniques to identify myocardial inflammation / oedema (eg. T2/T1 mapping), focal fibrosis (eg. late gadolinium enhancement \[LGE\] quantification), and diffuse fibrosis (extracellular volume or ECV quantification). The newest pixel-wise quantitative T1/T2-mapping techniques are also named by the ESC as one of six most innovative technologies to evaluate patients with heart failure. Thus, in the context of COVID-19, CMR is well positioned to assess for myocarditis and its long-term consequences, such as the development of myocardial fibrosis, cardiac remodeling and ultimately dysfunction and failure. This is attested to by the American College of Cardiology and European Society of Cardiology. Knowledge Gap - Long-Term Impact of COVID-19 related Myocardial Inflammation: Several studies have shown that for acute myocarditis, a majority of patients show a reduction in oedema and fibrosis, and improvement in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF). However, a proportion of patients show ongoing chronic myocarditis and deterioration on ventricular function, even progressing to dilated cardiomyopathy, clinical heart failure and death. The long-term impact of myocardial inflammation in COVID-19 patients is unknown. COVID-19 may follow a similar cardiac trajectory as other viral illnesses that affect the heart, and given the early reports of cardiac involvement post COVID-19, it is reasonable to expect that a proportion of COVID-19 survivors will develop adverse long-term consequences of cardiac morbidity and mortality. It is thus important to elucidate the determinants of clinical non-resolution of COVID-19 myocarditis, and to identify these signs early, before permanent damage occurs to cardiac structure and function. Furthermore, it is important to compare COVID-19 to patients with non-COVID-19 patients with viral respiratory infections to allow us to better understand the cardiovascular risks posed by COVID-19 compared to other viral respiratory illnesses. Preliminary Data: In addition to the aforementioned studies demonstrating myocardial involvement in COVID-19 survivors, our group has not only published similar findings in a CMR study, but concernedly, our patients had less severe (mild to moderate) initial COVID-19 and a majority were asymptomatic at follow-up, whilst the other studies were in patients with greater COVID-19 severity and had residual cardiac symptoms. Yet, the investigators still demonstrated that 56% of our cohort had imaging evidence of subclinical myocardial inflammation, a significant proportion of which also had serological markers (eg. troponin, c-reactive protein and white cell count) to support ongoing inflammation even at 2 months post hospital discharge. These findings are concerning in that many COVID-19 survivors have unrecognised myocardial inflammation that may be untreated, a proportion of which may resolve spontaneously, but some may go on to develop dilated cardiomyopathy and/or heart failure.