The study is an open-label trial to validate the local field potential (LFP) activity in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for slow-wave detection during acoustic stimulation during nighttime sleep in Parkinson's disease patients that receive deep-brain-stimulation (DBS) therapy with the novel PERCEPT™ DBS system.
The objective of this study is to validate the STN signal for slow-wave detection during auditory stimulation. To test this, the electrophysiological activity within the STN will be measured as local field potentials (LFP) using standard STN-DBS electrodes. To assess whether the recorded STN activity can be used for AS, the coherence analysis of cortical and STN slow waves will be performed. At the screening consultation, the study physician will obtain written informed consent, confirm inclusion and exclusion criteria, and obtain entry questionnaires including demographics, medical history, and concomitant therapy. Following a successful screening consultation, the study physician will schedule a screening night at the sleep laboratory in the department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), during which clinical surface EEG (12-channel system, including EMG, ECG, and EOG) will be recorded and AS will be applied. To test the individual susceptibility to AS, ERPs to auditory stimuli and SWA change will be assessed. If the screening night was successful, each patient will undergo a baseline consultation and 3 recording sessions. During all 3 recording sessions, the patients will be asked about their subjective sleep quality and current mood, concomitant therapy (including LED), and MDS-UPDRS III will be performed by the study physician. The surgical implantation (which is not part of the current proposal) follows standardized clinical protocol and is applied in 2 steps. Sleep will be recorded simultaneously with clinical surface EEG and STN LFP in all 3 recording sessions (combined LFP-EEG recording) and AS will be performed based on slow-wave detected in the surface EEG. In detail: In the first step, DBS leads are implanted in the STN, keeping the wires externalized. Following one night in the intensive or intermediate care unit for monitoring, patients will undergo a full-night combined LFP-EEG recording and AS (Recording Session 1), with LFP data collected from the externalized wires (DBS off). Next, the surgery will be completed by implantation of the neuromodulator and its connection to the DBS leads. Following the completion of the surgery, rehabilitation will start. The rehabilitation period will last for 2-5 weeks. At the end of the rehabilitation Recording Session 2 and 3 will take place. These recording session will be separated by 2-3 days and their order will be randomized and counterbalanced across participants. During Recording Session 2, combined LFP-EEG recording and AS will be performed during first 4 hours of the night sleep; STN LFP will be recorded with the implanted neurostimulator (DBS off). Recording Session 3 will be similar to Recording Session 2, but with DBS on (i.e. using DBS settings that were adjusted during rehabilitation). Because stable LFP recordings by PERCEPT™ PC neurostimulator is only possible for 4 hours, LFP sleep recordings during Recording Session 2 and 3 are limited to the first 4h of sleep. Surface EEG and AS, however, will be performed for the whole night after the LFP recoding end. Recording Sessions 2 and 3 will take place either at Clinic Lengg or in the USZ sleep laboratory (if the patient will be at a different rehabilitation center than Clinic Lengg). Additionally, circadian rhythm will be assessed continuously throughout the interventions using actigraphy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
15
In this project, the intervention is a presentation of low-volume non-arousing auditory stimuli during deep NREM sleep via attached headphones. Stimuli will be applied targeting the up-phase of slow waves to enhance sleep slow-wave activity. Previous studies showed that this procedure does not lead to reduced sleep quality nor result in changed sleep architecture. Therefore, no negative consequences as a result of our intervention are to be expected. In fact, it is currently applied in several other studies including children, adults, and the elderly. Importantly, stimulation is not arousing, as the sounds presented during deep sleep are brief (50 ms) and at low volume (around 50 dB). In case of arousal during sleep (detected using the surface EEG signal), the volume will be adjusted.
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich
Zurich, Switzerland
Identification of STN LFP correlates of cortical slow waves (i.e. 1-4 Hz, in the surface EEG)
The temporal relationships of the surface EEG and the LFP will be investigated using the event-related potentials (ERP) and cross-correlation analysis.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Comparing the slope of slow wave across the night between surface EEG and STN-LFP
In the EEG and the LFP recordings slow waves (0.5-4.5Hz) will be detected during all night NREM sleep. The slope of all detected slow-waves at the beginning of the night (i.e., first hour of sleep) will be compared to the slope of all detected slow waves at the end of the night (i.e., last hour of sleep) for the EEG and the LFP recordings separately. The overnight difference will be compared between the EEG and the LFP recordings.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Comparing the amplitude of slow wave across the night between surface EEG and STN-LFP
In the EEG and the LFP recordings slow waves (0.5-4.5Hz) will be detected during all night NREM sleep. The amplitude of all detected slow-waves at the beginning of the night (i.e., first hour of sleep) will be compared to the slope of all detected slow waves at the end of the night (i.e., last hour of sleep) for the EEG and the LFP recordings separately. The overnight difference will be compared between the EEG and the LFP recordings.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Comparing the incidence of slow wave across the night between surface EEG and STN-LFP
In the EEG and the LFP recordings slow waves (0.5-4.5Hz) will be detected during all night NREM sleep. The number of all detected slow-waves at the beginning of the night (i.e., first hour of sleep) will be compared to the number of all detected slow waves at the end of the night (i.e., last hour of sleep) for the EEG and the LFP recordings separately. The overnight difference will be compared between the EEG and the LFP recordings.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
AS effect on SWA in the surface EEG and STN-LFP
Comparing SWA (EEG power between 0.5-4.5Hz) during ON and OFF windows between surface EEG and STN-LFP
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
AS effect on the slope of slow waves in the surface EEG and STN-LFP
Comparing the slope of slow waves of all detected slow waves during ON compared to the slope of slow waves of all detected slow waves during OFF windows between surface EEG and STN-LFP
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
AS effect on the amplitude of slow waves in the surface EEG and STN-LFP
Comparing the amplitude of slow waves of all detected slow waves during ON compared to the slope of slow waves of all detected slow waves during OFF windows between surface EEG and STN-LFP
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
AS effect on frequencies over >4Hz
Comparing event-related potentials (ERP) between surface EEG and STN-LFP
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
AS effect on frequencies over >4Hz
Comparing time-frequency analysis of event-related spectral power (ERSP) between surface EEG and STN-LFP
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
AS effect on frequencies over >4Hz
Comparing inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC) between surface EEG and STN-LFP
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Quantitative comparison of presented stimuli between recording sessions (i.e. DBS ON vs DBS OFF), i.e., total number of stimuli presented
Number of presented tones will be compared between Recording Session 1, 2 and 3
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Quantitative comparison of presented stimuli between recording sessions (i.e. DBS ON vs DBS OFF), i.e., phase targeting of AS
Accuracy of slow-wave phase targeting during AS will be compared between Recording Session 1, 2 and 3
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Quantitative comparison of presented stimuli between recording sessions (i.e. DBS ON vs DBS OFF), i.e., characterization of detected slow-waves
The slope of detected slow-waves will be compared between Recording Session 1,2 and 3
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Quantitative comparison of presented stimuli between recording sessions (i.e. DBS ON vs DBS OFF), i.e., characterization of detected slow-waves
the amplitude of detected slow-waves will be compared between Recording Session 1,2 and 3
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Investigation of relationships between behavioral performance changes and the AS effects (slow-wave characteristics in surface EEG and STN LFP) under DBS ON and OFF conditions
Comparing reaction time and response inhibition in the Go-NoGo Task between conditions and the evening and morning
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years