Dry Eye Disease (DED) is a multifactorial pathology characterized by inflammation of the lacrimal functional unit that develops in ocular surface pathology, severely affecting patients quality of life. The core of the treatment relies at present in antinflammatory topical therapies, which are still scarce. The investigators hypothesize that osteopathy-based techniques may help these patients by influencing the central involvement regarding parasympathetic innervation of tear and saliva-secreting glands. The aim of this osteopathic treatment protocol is to release the involved structures in the tear-secreting system innervation, such as the sphenopalatine ganglion. In addition, this ganglion innervates the minor salivary glands, therefore it is intended to help patients suffering from xerostomia. The hypothesis then is that a systemic protocol treatment can help balance both parts of the vegetative nervous system (sympathetic and parasympathetic) with the objective of increasing the secretion of tear and saliva in patients with ocular and oral dryness (DED and xerostomia, respectively), thus improving their clinical situation. This osteopathic protocol does not have the potential to cause adverse effects. The main objective is to analyze the efficacy of this protocol application in terms of improving symptoms and signs of ocular and oral dryness, tear film quality and inflammation molecule levels in tears and saliva.
This clinical study intended to offer an alternative therapeutic tool for a disease, dry eye, that is highly prevalent, causes a decreased in the quality of life and work productivity, and whose pharmacologic treatment is very limited. The osteopathy protocol consists of an initial assessment of the cranial vault and 7 techniques through which the different structures involved are treated and are as follows: 1) balance of the cranio-sacral system; 2) reharmonization of sphenobasilar synchondrosis; 3) and 4) release of the bony components in the pterygo-palatine fossa (maxillas and sphenoid); 5) and 6) release of the bony components in relation with the main lacrimal gland (frontal and front-malar suture); and 7) sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation. The patient is always in supine position and the investigator is standing on the side. The proposed osteopathy protocol is innocuous, with no possible adverse effects. The main objective is to analyze the efficacy of this protocol application in terms of improving symptoms and signs of ocular and oral dryness, tear film quality and inflammation molecule levels in tears and saliva. Recruited patients will have dry eye disease (and subsequently ocular dryness) and oral dryness (xerostomia). Inclusion/exclusion criteria are detailed in the corresponding section below, as well as all outcome measures. All COVID19-related sanitary regulations will be strictly followed.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
30
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation to improve lacrimal and salivary gland secretion to improve ocular and oral dryness
IOBA
Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Score value 0-48, where higher score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: 6 Weeks
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Score value 0-48, where higher score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Modified Single-Item Score Dry Eye-Questionnaire (mSIDEQ)
Score value 0-28, where higher score means a worse outcome
Time frame: 6 Weeks
Modified Single-Item Score Dry Eye-Questionnaire (mSIDEQ)
Score value 0-28, where higher score means a worse outcome
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Visual analogue Scale (VAS)
Unique measurements 0-10, where higher score means a worse outcome
Time frame: 6 Weeks
Visual analogue Scale (VAS)
Unique measurements 0-10, where higher score means a worse outcome
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Change in Dry Eye Symptoms Questionnaire (CDES-Q)
First question compares how the patient is at the moment compared with last session in terms of "Equal", "Better" or "Worse". If better or worse is chose, two more questions measure how much improvement or worsening from a 0-10 scale, where higher score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: 6 Weeks
Change in Dry Eye Symptoms Questionnaire (CDES-Q)
First question compares how the patient is at the moment compared with last session in terms of "Equal", "Better" or "Worse". If better or worse is chose, two more questions measure how much improvement or worsening from a 0-10 scale, where higher score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Statistically significant amelioration in oral symptoms
Enhancement in Xerostomia Inventory Spanish version (XI-Sp) test score 0-11, where higher score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: 6 Weeks
Statistically significant amelioration in oral symptoms
Enhancement in Xerostomia Inventory Spanish version (XI-Sp) test score 0-11, where higher score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Statistically significant improvement in tear secretion
Schirmer I test, which test score is 0-35 mm, where lower score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: 6 Weeks
Statistically significant improvement in tear secretion
Schirmer I test, which test score is 0-35 mm, where lower score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Statistically significant improvement in salivary discharge
Salivary flow rate, where flow rate below 0,1ml flow is considered hyposalivation.
Time frame: 6 Weeks
Statistically significant improvement in salivary discharge
Salivary flow rate, where flow rate below 0,1ml flow is considered hyposalivation.
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Decrease in tear collection time
Statistically significant improvement in tear collection time, using a microcapillar of 1μl.
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Increased salivary flow rate
Statistically significant increased salivary flow rate, using Modified Fox Sreebny Technique.
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Lipiflow interferometry - lipid layer thickness
Statistically significant improvement in lipid layer thickness using Interferometry with Lipiview.
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Lipiflow interferometry - incomplete blink rate
Statistically significant improvement in incomplete blink rate using Interferometry with Lipiview.
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Lipiflow interferometry - c-factor
Statistically significant improvement in c-factor, using Interferometry with Lipiview.
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Enhancement in Break-Up Time Test
Statistically significant enhancement in Break-Up Time Test (normal \>7 seconds) where lower score means a worse outcome.
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Corneal Staining
Statistically significant enhancement in Corneal Staining, using Oxford Scale and Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit (CCLRU) Scale, score 0-5 where higher scores means worse outcome.
Time frame: 18 Weeks
Significant beneficial change in molecules evaluated in tear or saliva
The following putative salivary indicators of pain are assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): Cortisol (DRG Salivary Cortisol ELISA (DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany), testosterone (DRG Instruments GmbH), sTNFαRII (Quantikine, Human sTNF RII/TNFRSF1B Immunoassay, R\&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). sAA is
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 18 Weeks