This study aims to evaluate the performance of the suggestions made by the WRA by comparing Ada's list of suggested conditions and advice level to usual care and a gold-standard in a Romanian clinical setting.
This pilot study investigates the performance of the Romanian version of Ada's Waiting Room Application in a clinical setting. The study will take place in a family doctor's practice in Cluj-Napoca, Romania. While waiting for their consultation with a family doctor, participants will complete an Ada assessment. The results of this assessment will not be available for viewing by the participants or the family practitioner. During and after consultation, the family practitioner will create two top 5 differential diagnoses list--one based on symptoms only and one based on physical examination and investigation results. The accuracy and comprehensiveness of Ada's differential diagnoses will be compared against the family practitioner's and a gold-standard.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
49
The Ada WRA is a study-only device based on the Ada mobile app. The patient will use this device to answer questions regarding their symptoms but will not be given any feedback by the app.
Dr. Claudia Pîrșan
Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Accuracy and comprehensiveness of the Ada WRA
Accuracy and comprehensiveness of the Ada WRA assessment evaluated against the gold standard differential diagnosis from the panel.
Time frame: about 5 months to gather the data
Accuracy and comprehensiveness of the family practitioner
Accuracy and comprehensiveness of the family practitioner's differential diagnosis evaluated against the gold standard differential diagnosis from the panel.
Time frame: about 5 months to gather the data
Qualitative data on the chronology usability, usefulness and acceptance
Gathered from surveys from patient, study nurse, and doctor
Time frame: about 3 months to gather the data
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.