The purpose of this study is to determine whether reading of low-dose thoracic CT scans can be done by a single general radiologist who has been trained to lung cancer screening, and will evaluate the performance in comparison with double reading by experts. The study will enroll women between 50 and 74 years old, at risk for lung cancer due to their smoking history.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death, worldwide. Several randomized studies have demonstrated that annual or biennial low-dose CT screening reduces lung cancer mortality. However, these studies involved expert chest radiologists, with double reading being performed in most studies. Furthermore, none of the published studies have evaluated the role of artificial intelligence to serve as second of concurrent reader. Women with at least 20 pack-year smoking history who quitted smoking less than 15 years ago will be enrolled to have baseline, 1-year and 2-year low-dose CT of the chest. The CT scans will be read on site by a general radiologist trained to lung cancer screening according to the European lung cancer screening certification program, first without then with the aid of an artificial algorithm trained to lung nodule detection (Veye Chest, Aidence). All CT scans will also be read by 2 chest experts, who will resolve their disagreement by a consensus reading if necessary. Patient management will rely on the double reading by expert. The criteria for positive screen result are as follows: solid nodule \> 500 mm3 (10 mm) or growing (30% volume increase), part-solid nodule with \> 8 mm solid component or new or growing, pure ground glass nodule developing a solid portion.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
2,635
Baseline low dose Ct acquisition, then at 1 year and 2 years to depict suspicious lung nodules
Hôtel-Dieu
Paris, France
RECRUITINGPerformance of trained radiologists for lung cancer screening
Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values compared to double reading by experts
Time frame: 2 years
Effectiveness of screening
Proportion of participants with a positive screening test and proportion of confirmed diagnosis of cancer
Time frame: 2 years
Analysis of the diagnostic performance of the reading without detection software, in order to assess its incremental value
For the general population and for the COPD population. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios of the initial reading compared to the expert readings, using histological diagnosis as gold standard for positive screens and stability at 2 years for negative screens
Time frame: 2 years
Analysis of the performance of a reading by detection software alone
For the general population and for the COPD population. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios of artificial intelligence alone
Time frame: 2 years
Analysis of the concordances of the different readings
Kappa concordance coefficient between the different readings
Time frame: 2 years
Adherence to screening
Number of participants related to the number of eligible women, having completed all the required scans (3 to 6), speed of inclusion in the study. Enrolment will be assessed on the basis of the following characteristics: weaned or non-weaned smokers, level of education, socio-economic category, etc
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Analysis of the impact of screening on smoking cessation
Smoking cessation rate at the end of the study
Time frame: 2 years
Psychological impact of screening
HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) questionnaire at each scan, Cancer worry scale, Satisfaction with Decision scale at inclusion and end of study, all translated into French
Time frame: 2 years
Number of co-morbidities (COPD, coronary artery disease) detected
Number of participants related to the number of women included in the study for whom treatment is initiated (bronchodilators/ statins or revascularization/ osteoporosis treatment)
Time frame: 2 years
Evaluation of costs induced by screening
Cost measures: total cost of screening, average cost per woman, average cost per woman screened
Time frame: 2 years
Prevalence of osteoporosis by opportunistic screening
Presence of at least one thoracic vertebral fracture and measurement of trabecular attenuation of the T8 vertebral body
Time frame: 2 years