The purpose of this single site clinical study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Soliton Rapid Acoustic Pulse (RAP) device for the improvement of cellulite comparing two different RAP treatment doses.
This is a non-significant risk, single-center, prospective trial for safety, and efficacy using Soliton's RAP device for the improvement in the appearance of cellulite performed at 1 (one) clinical research site in the United States. Approximately 15 healthy female participants between the age of 18-55 inclusive will be enrolled in this study. Participants who sign the informed consent form and meet all the eligible criteria will be enrolled in the study. Each participant will undergo acoustic rapid pulse (RAP) treatments on each of the participants buttocks and legs. The participant's right buttock and leg will receive 100 Hz doses, and the participants left buttock and leg will receive 50 Hz doses. Total study duration is anticipated to be at or less than 55 weeks from the first participant visit to the last participant observation visit. A total of 3 visits, plus two optional visits are planned for this study as listed below: * Visit 1: Baseline/Screening (-30 Days to Day 0) * Visit 2: Treatment (Day 0) * Visit 3: 12-week Follow-Up Visit (+/- 14 Days) * Visit 4: 26-week Follow-Up Visit (+/- 14 Days) (Optional) * Visit 5: 52 Week Follow-Up Visit (+/- 14 Days) (Optional)
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
15
Treatment of cellulite with RAP device
The Practice of Brian Biesman
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Assessing safety
The primary safety short-term endpoint to be met if all treated participants were free from unexpected adverse events (UAEs) or serious adverse events (SAEs) attributable to the RAP treatment immediately post-treatment
Time frame: Immediately post treatment
Assessing safety
The primary safety short-term endpoint to be met if all treated participants were free from unexpected adverse events (UAEs) or serious adverse events (SAEs) attributable to the RAP treatment at the short-term (12-week) visit.
Time frame: 12 weeks post treatment
Assessing Efficacy
The primary effectiveness objective was to demonstrate improvement in the appearance of cellulite from the 100 Hz treatment is comparable to the 50 Hz treatment. Efficacy determined by the results of a blinded independent physician assessment (IPA) panel correctly identifying the 12-week post-treatment photographs from randomly placed side-by-side comparison of before and after photographs for both treatments. The primary effectiveness endpoint will be met if the rate of correctly identified before and after photos for 100 Hz treatment is not significantly lower than the 50 Hz treatment assessment.
Time frame: At 12 week follow up visit
Assessing Participant Satisfaction
Improvement in cellulite as measured by the percentage of participants who agree or strongly agree that the final photograph of the treatment area as compared to the baseline photograph, appears improved.
Time frame: At the 12 week follow up visit
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.