This study aims to compare treatment with Imipenem/Cilastatin-XNW4107 (IMI-XNW4107) with imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/REL) in participants with hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP or VAPB, respectively). The primary hypothesis is that IMI-XNW4107 is non-inferior to IMI/REL in all-cause mortality.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
450
Imipenem/Cilastatin 500mg/500mg and XNW4107 250mg for Injection
Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam 1.25 g for Injection
Day 14 All-cause Mortality Rate
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14.
Time frame: Day 14
Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 28.
Time frame: Day 28
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Micro-MITT Population
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Time frame: Day 14, Day 28
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Extended Micro-MITT
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Time frame: Day 14, Day 28
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Time frame: Day 14, Day 28
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Denver Health and Hospital Authority
Denver, Colorado, United States
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Jackson Memorial Hospital (JMH) - Ryder Trauma Center
Miami, Florida, United States
USF-TGH
Tampa, Florida, United States
University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Cox Health
Springfield, Missouri, United States
VA medical center
Buffalo, New York, United States
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
The University of Tennessee Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
...and 25 more locations
Time frame: Day 14, Day 28
Day 14 and Day 28 All-cause Mortality Rate in the Carbapenem-resistant MITT (CR-MITT) Population
The all-cause mortality rate at Day 14 and Day 28 was calculated as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who experienced mortality, regardless of the cause, from randomization up to Day 14 and Day 28.
Time frame: Day 14, Day 28
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the MITT Population
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For end of treatment (EOT) or test-of-cure (TOC) visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Time frame: Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Micro-MITT Population
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Time frame: Day 4, EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the Extended Micro-MITT
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Time frame: Day 4, EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CE Population
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Time frame: Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the ME Population
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Time frame: Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Clinical Success as Evaluated by the Investigator in the CR-MITT Population
Clinical success was defined as: For Day 4 visit: a participant was alive with resolution or improvement in at least 1 baseline sign/symptom AND no worsening of any baseline signs/symptoms AND no development of new signs/symptoms of pneumonia requiring the initiation of a non-study antibacterial therapy for the index infection. For EOT or TOC visits: a participant was alive with complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms that were present at baseline and no new signs/symptoms of pneumonia, such that no further antibacterial therapy is necessary. For LFU, Clinical success at TOC with sustained resolution or marked improvement of baseline signs and symptoms of pneumonia during TOC and LFU without antimicrobial therapy (pneumonia).
Time frame: Day 4, end of treatment (EOT) (up to Day 14), Test-of-Cure (TOC) (Day 21), and Late Follow-up (LFU) (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Micro-MITT Population
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the CR-MITT Population
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success in the ME Population
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Micro-MITT Population
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the ME Population
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen in the CR-MITT Population
Microbiological success was defined as: • Eradication: Absence of the baseline Gram-negative pathogen from an appropriate clinical specimen • Presumed eradication: Absence of appropriate post-baseline culture material in a participant, but judged to be a clinical success.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Micro-MITT Population
Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the Extended Micro-MITT Population
Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the ME Population
Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
The Percentage of Participants With Overall Success in the CR-MITT Population
Overall success was defined as clinical success and microbiological success at the visits of EOT or TOC, or sustained success for clinical outcome and microbiological success at the visit of LFU. Microbiological success included eradication or presumed eradication.
Time frame: EOT (up to Day 14), TOC (Day 21), and LFU (Day 28)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
A TEAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence after first dose associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. An SAE was defined as any adverse event (AE) occurring at any dose that met one or more of the following criteria: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required participant hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect or an important medical event.
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 28
Blood XNW4107, Imipenem, and Cilastatin Concentrations
Blood samples were taken for analysis of XNW4107, imipenem, and cilastatin concentrations. The data at each time point was calculated as an average across Days 4, 5 and 6.
Time frame: Predose, 5-25 minutes post-dose, and 2-3 hours post-dose on Day 4, 5, or 6