This retro-prospective monocentric observational study compare the impact of the implementation of a restrictive (delayed) versus aggressive (immediate) antibiotic strategy for Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia suspicion without severity symptoms.
Ventilator acquired pneumonia (VAP) is the leading cause of nosocomial infection in intensive care patients, and has been associated with increased antibiotic consumption, increased morbidity and mortality. VAP diagnosis is difficult due to subjective or non-specific criteria. Delaying antibiotic treatment for VAP suspicion without severity symptoms raises question since the probability of VAP diagnosis, as well as the risk of delaying treatment, is very uncertain. It may nonetheless limit the environmental impact of antibiotic use which is a public health concern. We compared antibiotic sparing and patient outcome, before and after the implementation of a restrictive (delayed) antibiotic strategy versus an aggressive (immediate) antibiotic strategy in VAP suspicion without severity symptoms.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
87
Implementation of a restrictive (delayed) antibiotic strategy in Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia suspicion without severity symptoms.
Implementation of an aggressive (immediate) antibiotic strategy in Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia suspicion without severity symptoms.
University Nantes Hospital
Nantes, France
antibiotic-free days
antibiotic-free days until Day 28 of Intensive Care Units stay
Time frame: 28 days
Mechanical ventilation free days
Mechanical ventilation free days during the first 28 days
Time frame: 28 days
Intensive care unit stay length
Time frame: 28 days
Intensive care unit mortality
Time frame: 28 days
Hospitality mortality
Time frame: 28 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.