The aim is to compare outcomes of two different procedures to prevent occult stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in patients who are having pelvic organ prolapse surgeries
The aim is to compare outcomes of two different procedures to prevent occult stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in patients who are having pelvic organ prolapse surgeries. Charts will be reviewed for patients who had single- incision sling or urethral bulking injection with other prolapse surgeries to address occult stress incontinence at The Christ Hospital from the period of January 2019 to June 2021. Patients who didn't have any occult stress incontinence pre-operatively and didn't receive any anti-incontinence procedure during their prolapse surgery will be included as a control group. Surgical details, adverse events and postoperative voiding times will be collected from the chart. Patients will be contacted by a telephone to administer a validated questionnaire; a 3-day bladder diary to quantify urinary incontinence will be send to the patient to complete and return by mail. The purpose of the study is to investigate whether urethral bulking is as effective as single- incision sling in treating occult stress incontinence.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
60
Single incision sling is used to treat occult SUI
Urethral bulking by Bulkamid is used to treat occult SUI
The Christ Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Urinary Distress Inventory, Short Form (UDI-6)
Time frame: one year after surgery
Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, Short Form (IIQ-7)
Time frame: one year after surgery
Voiding diary
Time frame: one year after surgery
The rate of complications in both groups which includes adverse events, rate of urine retention with prolonged catheterization, and UTI.
Time frame: one year after surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.