To pilot a culturally adapted version of ENABLE (6-month program) for Heart Failure (HF) patients and caregivers in the inpatient and outpatient setting in Singapore. The investigators aim to determine the feasibility of trial procedures and assess the acceptability and preliminary efficacy of ENABLE with a randomized wait-list controlled trial design.
Palliative care improves quality of life (QOL) of patients and their caregivers. The ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise Before Life Ends) intervention is a novel, nurse-led, structured, palliative care coaching program, developed in the United States for patients (and caregivers of patients) facing serious illnesses. It aims to empower patients and caregivers to manage their problems, prepare for the future, and has showed beneficial impact on patient and caregiver QOL. The ENABLE coaching program is a potentially scalable means of delivering palliative care to a large population; as compared to the current local model of palliative care provision, which uses a resource intensive multidisciplinary care model that is not easily scalable and therefore unlikely to meet the growing needs of HF patients and caregivers locally. However, it is unclear if the ENABLE HF program will be culturally acceptable and efficacious in Singapore, in view of differing socio-cultural attitudes and expectations regarding healthcare and treatments, decision making and care planning. Overall aim - To pilot a culturally adapted version of ENABLE (6-month program) for HF patients and caregivers in the inpatient and outpatient setting in Singapore. Specific Aim 1 - Assessment of feasibility of trial procedures in the local HF population. Intervention arm participants will start on ENABLE after randomization, while wait-list participants will start on ENABLE after 6 months. The investigators will evaluate the percentage of eligible participant dyads who consent to participate and who are able to complete the ENABLE program. The investigators will also explore the percentage completion rate of patient and caregiver reported outcome measures. \- Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize a-priori that 80% of eligible participant dyads will consent to participate and 80% of eligible participant dyads will be able to complete the ENABLE program. Specific aim 2 - Assessment of acceptability of ENABLE. The investigators aim to study the acceptability of ENABLE to all patient-caregiver dyads. This will be done through evaluating the total scores of a satisfaction survey of all participants at the end of ENABLE. \- Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that at least 80% of all participants will find the ENABLE program acceptable. Specific aim 3 - Assessment of the possible efficacy of ENABLE. The investigators will evaluate whether there is an efficacy signal that indicates ENABLE may improve patient QOL in the local HF context. \- Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that patient participants randomized to the intervention arm will have more improvement in their mean QOL scores after 6 months as compared to the wait-list control group.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
125
Participants in the intervention arm will start on the ENABLE program at point of randomization
Participants on wait-list will continue on usual care and only start ENABLE 6 months after randomization.
National Cancer Centre Singapore
Singapore, Singapore
National Heart Centre Singapore
Singapore, Singapore
Feasibility of trial procedures - percentage of patients and caregivers that are recruited, successfully randomized, and able to complete the ENABLE program
The percentage of eligible participants that are able to be recruited, randomized and subsequently complete the ENABLE program will be calculated.
Time frame: 6 months.
Acceptability of ENABLE program - through completion of the client satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ-4)
The total score of the CSQ-4 will be calculated for each participant. For the assessment of acceptability, scores from participants from both intervention and wait-list control groups will be pooled, except for participants who drop out prior to starting ENABLE (for reasons unrelated to the ENABLE program). The minimum expected score per participant is 4, and the maximum expected score per participant is 16. A higher score indicates higher satisfaction.
Time frame: 6 months.
The possible efficacy of the ENABLE program- through evaluating change in patient quality of life (QOL) at 6 months as compared to baseline (assessed using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire - KCCQ)
For the primary outcome of change in patient QOL, we will compare the change in the QOL from baseline to 6 months post randomization in the intervention group versus the change from baseline to 6 months post randomization in the control group. The difference between the intervention and wait-list control arm will be quantified as Cohen's d effect sizes to get an initial estimate of the efficacy of ENABLE. The minimum score on KCCQ is 0 and maximum possible score is 100. A higher score indicates a better quality of life.
Time frame: 6 months.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.