Growing evidence has confirmed that the prognosis of lung cancer is not only related to the stage of disease, but also to the physiological and psychological situation of the patients. Malignant tumors are often associated with weakness and cachexia, leading to less physical activities and worse moods. However, few studies that have attempted to investigate the impact of nutritional status on the prognosis of NSCLC. Existing applications of nutritional scoring systems in early-stage of NSCLC are very limited. Therefore, this study aims to observe the correlation between nutritional status and the prognosis of patients with early-stage NSCLC, to clarify the value in predicting the overall survival rate and progression-free survival rate of NSCLC patients, and to offer evidence for alleviating the social and economic burden of NSCLC.
The prognosis of lung cancer is not only related to the stage of disease, but also to the physiological and psychological situation of the patients. Malignant tumors are often associated with weakness and cachexia, leading to less physical activities and worse moods. However, few studies that have attempted to investigate the impact of nutritional status on the prognosis of NSCLC. Existing applications of nutritional scoring systems in early-stage of NSCLC are very limited. Therefore, this study aims to observe the correlation between nutritional status and the prognosis of patients with early-stage NSCLC, to clarify the value in predicting the overall survival rate and progression-free survival rate of NSCLC patients, and to offer evidence for alleviating the social and economic burden of NSCLC.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
469
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis with Inbody 570 (Inbody Co., Seoul, Korea) during each follow-up
Handgrip strength measurement using a JAMAR Dynamometer (JAMAR Co., Ltd., USA) during each follow-up
Chest and abdominal CT scan during each follow-up
Huadong hospital, Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Due to the treatment frequency of lung cancer, we implemented the following follow-up schedule with actual follow-up completed for five years. Progression-free survival was measured from the date of diagnosis until the first occurrence of either: Objective tumor progression (confirmed by imaging per RECIST criteria), or death from any cause. whichever occurred first.
Time frame: Follow-up were conducted every 2months during the first year and every 6 months for up to 5 years from enrollment. Progression-free survival was measured from the date of diagnosis until confirmed disease progression or death, whichever occurred first.
Overall Survival (OS)
Outcome of patient death from diagnosis to any cause or the final follow-up time
Time frame: Follow-up were conducted every 2months during the first year and every 6 months for up to 5 years from enrollment. overall survival was measured from the date of diagnosis until death or the final follow-up time.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.