High vs. Standard Dose Influenza Vaccine in Lung Allograft Recipients

Overview

Lung allograft recipients have a higher burden of influenza disease and greater associated morbidity and mortality compared with healthy controls. Induction and early maintenance immunosuppression is thought to impair immunogenicity to standard dose inactivated influenza vaccine. This early post-transplant period is when immunity is most desirable, since influenza disease during this time frame is associated with adverse consequences. Thus, strategies to reduce severe influenza disease in this highly susceptible population are critical. No trials in lung transplant recipients have evaluated two doses of HD-IIV within the same influenza season as a strategy to improve immunogenicity and durability of influenza prevention. Furthermore, no influenza vaccine trials have focused on enrollment of subjects at early post-transplant timepoints. Very few studies have been performed in solely lung allograft recipients. Immunosuppression intensity is highest in lung patients, thereby limiting comparisons to recipients of heart, liver, and kidney transplants. Therefore, studies to assess both HD-IIV and two-dose strategies in the same influenza season in post-lung transplant recipients are greatly needed. The central hypothesis of our proposal is that lung allograft recipients who are 1-35 months post-transplant and receiving two doses of HD-quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (QIV) will have higher HAI geometric mean titers (GMT) to influenza antigens compared to those receiving two doses of SD-QIV. To test this hypothesis and address the above critical knowledge gaps, we propose to conduct a phase II, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled immunogenicity and safety trial comparing the administration of two doses of HD-QIV to two doses of SD-QIV in lung allograft recipients 1-35 months post-transplant. The results of this clinical trial will address significant knowledge gaps regarding influenza vaccine strategies (e.g., one vs. two doses and HD-QIV vs. SD-QIV) and immune responses in lung transplant recipients and will guide vaccine recommendations during the post-transplant period.

Study Design: The proposed study is a phase II, multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled immunogenicity and safety trial comparing two doses of HD-QIV to two doses of SD-QIV in lung allograft recipients. 1. Hypothesis 1: We hypothesize that lung allograft recipients 1-35 months post-transplant who receive two doses of HD-QIV will develop higher HAI GMTs to influenza antigens compared to lung allograft recipients receiving two doses of SD-QIV. Specific Aim 1: To compare the HAI GMTs to influenza antigens in lung allograft recipients after receiving either two doses of HD-QIV or two doses of SD-QIV. 2. Hypothesis 2: We hypothesize that administration of two doses of HD-QIV in lung transplant recipients will be well tolerated and the safety profile will be similar to two doses of SD-QIV with regard to solicited local and systemic side effects. Specific Aim 2: To compare the frequency and severity of solicited local and systemic adverse events in lung allograft recipients after receiving either two doses of HD-QIV or two doses of SD-QIV. 3. Hypothesis 3: We hypothesize that baseline immunophenotypic markers of exhaustion, immune senescence, and immune activation at the pre-vaccine timepoint will correlate with post-vaccine HAI titers. Specific Aim 3: To define the relationship between baseline phenotypes of T- and B-cell subsets, T-cell activation and post-vaccination HAI titers among lung allograft recipients receiving either two doses of HD-QIV or two doses of SD-QIV. Study Population: The study will enroll a total of approximately 270 subjects ≥16 years who have undergone lung transplantation within 1-35 months. Study Enrollment: The enrollment period will be over a three-years. Subjects will be randomized into one of two groups. Group 1 will receive two doses of HD-QIV (0.7 mL; 60μg of each influenza antigen), whereas Group 2 will receive two doses of SD-QIV (0.5 mL; 15μg of each influenza antigen). Influenza Surveillance: Active surveillance for influenza-like symptoms will begin when influenza season starts in each site's community, defined in previous trials as identification of at least two positive respiratory tests for influenza, with at least 10% of diagnostic tests positive during two consecutive weeks in the local clinical or research laboratory.41,42 Enrollment will continue during influenza season with nasal swabs obtained at all main visits to document the occurrence of influenza virus both prior to and after vaccination. During the influenza season, the study staff will attempt to do a weekly telephone and/or electronic communication with the participants to detect and document any influenza-like illness (ILI) and any specific COVID-19 like symptoms. If subjects meet ILI criteria and/or any specific COVID-19 like symptoms (see below), an additional nasal swab will be collected\*. ILI criteria are met by occurrence of one of the conditions below: * Fever: ≥38°C (100.4°F) * Two or more of any of the following: respiratory symptoms (rhinorrhea, sinus congestion, post-nasal drip, shortness of breath, cough, wheezing, sputum production, sore throat, sneezing, watery eyes, ear pain, hoarseness); or systemic symptoms (myalgias, chills, chest pain, or headache); or new loss of taste or new loss of smell; or gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea or vomiting). * Per investigators' discretion at each individual site, a swab is not needed if there is a known non-respiratory cause of symptoms.