Objective: To explore the association between spatio-temporal blood flow velocities (peak systole and end-diastole at prior-stenosis, at maximum stenosis, and post-stenosis) and carotid plaque vulnerability defined by histology staining. Secondary, to assess the association between ultrasound elastography and carotid plaque vulnerability defined by histology staining. Furthermore, to assess the association between blood flow-derived parameters, including wall shear stress (WSS), vector complexity and vorticity, and plaque vulnerability. To evaluate the hemodynamic consequences of a CEA. Last, to explore whether the presence of circulating biomarkers is related to the degree of plaque vulnerability (as reflected by histology and/or ultrasound). Study design: A multicentre, prospective, observational, cohort study in a total of 70 patients. Study population: Patients with a carotid artery stenosis ≥50% according to clinically performed imaging (i.e. duplex, computed tomography angiography (CTA), or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)) that are scheduled for a CEA. Intervention (observational): A carotid ultrasound with flow and elastography (strain and shear wave) measurements will be performed maximally 2 weeks prior to the CEA. In the first 20 included patients in the Radboudumc, a 10 mL blood sample will be collected during surgery via the arterial line that is applied for regular care. The plaque excised during CEA will be histologically examined to assess the plaque composition, and therefore plaque vulnerability. Ultrasound-based flow imaging will be repeated six weeks after the CEA to assess the hemodynamic consequences of the CEA procedure. Besides, clinical parameters will be subtracted from electronic health record or, if missing, anamnestically collected from the patient. Main study parameters/endpoints: Association between 2D spatio-temporal blood flow velocities (peak systole and end-diastole at prior-stenosis, maximum stenosis and post-stenosis), measured by ultrafast ultrasound measurements, and plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable), defined by histology staining.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
70
Carotid ultrasound with flow and elastography (strain and shear wave) measurements will be performed maximally 2 weeks prior to the CEA. Ultrasound-based flow imaging will be repeated six weeks after the CEA to assess the hemodynamic consequences of the CEA procedure.
The plaque excised during CEA will be histologically examined to assess the plaque composition, and therefore plaque vulnerability.
In the first 20 included patients in the Radboudumc, a 10 mL blood sample will be collected during surgery via the arterial line that is applied for regular care.
Rijnstate Hospital
Arnhem, Netherlands
Radboud university medical center
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Assocation between 2D blood flow velocities and plaque vulnerability
Explore the association between 2D spatio-temporal blood flow velocities (peak systole and end-diastole prior-stenosis, at maximum stenosis and post-stenosis) and atherosclerotic carotid plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable), defined by histology staining.
Time frame: Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA
Association strain and plaque vulnerability
Association between strain parameters and plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable) quantified by histology staining.
Time frame: Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA
Association shear wave elastography measures and plaque vulnerability
Association between shear wave parameters and plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable) quantified by histology staining. (only Radboudumc)
Time frame: Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA
Association blood flow-related parameters and plaque vulnerability
Association between blood flow-related parameters, including WSS, vector complexity and vorticity and carotid plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable) quantified by histology staining.
Time frame: Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA
Comparison predictive value for plaque vulnerability ultrafast imaging techniques vs clinically-used measurements
Comparison between the predictive value for plaque vulnerability (stable versus unstable) of ultrafast imaging techniques (i.e. flow, strain and shear wave elastography) with that of clinically-used duplex measurements.
Time frame: Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA
Status 2D blood flow velocity profiles and flow-related parameters prior- and post-CEA
Status of 2D blood flow velocity profiles and flow-related parameters (WSS, vector complexity and vorticity) prior- and post-CEA.
Time frame: Time Frame: max 2 weeks prior to CEA and 6 weeks after CEA
Association circulating inflammatory cytokines and plaque vulnerability
Association between the presence of circulating inflammatory cytokines and the degree of plaque vulnerability (as reflected by histology and/or ultrasound)
Time frame: Time Frame: During CEA
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.