This study will investigate Harmonic Motion Imaging guided Focused Ultrasound (HMIgFUS) method for ablation and sonoporation monitoring of breast tumors. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of real-time guidance/monitoring and ablation/sonoporation method. The hypothesis behind this proposed study is that High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) can be used to ablate tumor tissue, and microbubble-mediated Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound (LIFU) can be used to sonoporate tumor vasculature. The investigators of this study also hypothesize that HMI can be used to monitor HIFU ablation by measuring the changes in tissue stiffness that occur as a result of thermal ablation, guide LIFU sonoporation and HIFU ablation targeting stiff tumor tissue, and the HMI-monitored stiffness changes during ablation will correlate with post-treatment immune response. The ultimate goals of this study are: first, to assess whether these techniques can be used in the clinic in order to provide a well-monitored, noninvasive tumor ablation/sonoporation method for benign tumors and breast cancers, to minimize side effects due to invasiveness and enhance therapeutic effects of current methods; second, to make full use of the real-time monitoring capability of HMIgFUS for more precise, point-of-care treatment planning to ensure success of ablation/sonoporation and immune activation.
The objectives of this study are to demonstrate the initial clinical feasibility of using Harmonic Motion Imaging (HMI) for guiding and monitoring 1) Focused Ultrasound Surgery (FUS) in patients with benign tumors and stage 1 non-metastatic breast cancers and 2) microbubble-mediated Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound (LIFU), i.e., sonoporation, in early-stage, non-metastatic breast cancer patients. The secondary objective is to investigate the correlation between HMI-informed treatment response with patients' post-treatment immune profile. FUS is a non-invasive, non-ionizing treatment procedure that precisely focuses and delivers a large amount of ultrasound energy to the target area, causing a localized temperature rise and cell necrosis at the target. Patients with small solid tumors without positive lymph nodes have the highest survival rate. However, especially for patients with benign tumors (most common in younger women) and older patients (\>65 years old) who fit these criteria, an alternative treatment technique that is far less invasive than the current surgical or invasive ablative intervention may be more beneficial. The main advantage of treating breast tumors with focused ultrasound ablation (FUS) is its noninvasiveness, i.e., no need for surgery. Without surgery, recovery from the procedure is much faster, patients may experience less pain, and cosmetic results may be improved. On the other hand, microbubbles have been approved for use by the FDA in contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging, e.g., cardiac and liver imaging. Research has shown that microbubble mediated LIFU can improve intratumoral drug uptake via a phenomenon termed sonoporation, as a result of cavitation of microbubbles. Sonoporation does not cause any unexpected bias or additional toxicity compared with chemotherapy alone. Currently, sonoporation lacks imaging guidance. In this study, HMI and contrast-enhanced power Doppler will be investigated to guide and monitor sonoporation. Microbubbles will be injected at an FDA-approved dose and route. HMI is an ultrasound elasticity method that can provide measurements of the locally generated mechanical response and inherent mechanical properties of tissues. The result is a new image that contains unique localized information on the relative stiffness in and around the tumor. HMI can be performed simultaneously with HIFU ablation so that HIFU ablation can be monitored with HMI without interruption of HIFU treatment. When used for monitoring thermal ablation using FUS, the integrated system is referred to as HMIgFUS, which stands for Harmonic Motion Imaging for Focused Ultrasound. The resulting synchronous monitoring system has the ability to follow and identify the areas of necrosis. This study aims to evaluate the HMI technique for monitoring FUS ablation in a clinical setting and investigate the correlation between HMI-monitored displacement and patients' immune response.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
82
Harmonic motion imaging guided focused ultrasound (HMIgFUS) is a combined treatment and imaging method, in which focused ultrasound (FUS) is used to thermally ablate tissue and harmonic motion imaging (HMI) is used for FUS guidance and monitoring. FUS applies high intensity focused ultrasound waves at its specified target to heat the tissue over a specified duration, causing cell death at the target area. HMI is an elasticity imaging technique which induces dynamic tissue vibrations at the target for tissue elasticity characterization. One of the inclusion criteria for this study is that participants must be scheduled for surgical excision of their breast tumor. In this study, HMIgFUS will be applied to anesthetized participants immediately prior to their scheduled surgery. HMI imaging will also be performed immediately prior to and after HMIgFUS application.
Microbubble-mediated Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound (LIFU) is a minimally invasive procedure which delivers localized ultrasound energy to the target region, causing cavitation of microbubbles to safely and transiently increase the permeability of vessels that aids local delivery of medicine.
Definity is a diagnostic ultrasound enhancing agent used to improve the clarity of echocardiograms and other ultrasound images. It consists of tiny, gas-filled lipid microspheres (about the size of a red blood cell) that circulate in the bloodstream to reflect ultrasound waves.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NYP
New York, New York, United States
RECRUITINGNumber of patients with ablation
To identify markers of ablation progression using HMIgFUS images, thereby predicting whether ablation occurred or not. The investigators will also use differences in HMI imaging performed before and after ablation to assess the presence of ablation. The results from both of these methods will be validated with pathological findings, to determine whether ablation was achieved.
Time frame: From the date of ablation and imaging to the date of pathological results (approximately 1 week)
R2 value of ablated lesion depth
The depth of the lesion (in mm away from the surface of the skin) as shown on HMIgFUS images will be compared and validated with pathological findings.
Time frame: From the date of ablation and imaging to the date of pathological results (approximately 1 week)
R2 value of ablated lesion width
The width of the lesion (in mm laterally across the lesion) as shown on HMIgFUS images will be compared and validated with pathological findings.
Time frame: From the date of ablation and imaging to the date of pathological results (approximately 1 week)
R2 value of ablated lesion area
The area of the lesion (in mm\^2) as shown on HMIgFUS images will be compared and validated with pathological findings.
Time frame: From the date of ablation and imaging to the date of pathological results (approximately 1 week)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.