Hall Technique or Modified Hall Technique of Deep Carious Lesions in Primary Molars

N/ACompletedNCT05220865

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University268 enrolled

Overview

The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the clinical/radiographic success of Hall technique and modified Hall technique in the treatment of primary molars with deep dentine carious lesions in children (3-12-year-old). The secondary aim is to examine the effect of marginal ridge breakdown level on treatment success.

Untreated caries in deciduous teeth affect 532 million children worldwide. According to the Turkey Oral and Dental Health Profile study conducted in 2018, the prevalence of untreated caries in 5-year-old children is 64.4%. The traditional treatment of dentine caries is to restore the teeth after removal of the carious tissue. There is increasing evidence for minimally invasive interventions as an alternative to this traditional operative/restorative treatment. One of the minimally invasive treatment approaches applied in children is the Hall Technique. Local anesthesia and tooth preparation are not required in this technique, and decayed primary molars are covered with stainless steel crowns without removing any carious tissue. The Hall technique has advantages such as preventing aerosol formation, shortening the treatment time, increasing patient cooperation, and reducing the need for general anesthesia and sedation in noncompliant patients. Its popularity has also increased during the Covid-19 process. The success of the Hall technique in primary teeth with deep caries has been investigated in a limited number of clinical studies, and it has been observed that the technique has lower success rates in teeth with deep caries than in teeth with shallow/medium depth caries. To answer the question of whether modifying the Hall technique (removing the necrotic carious dentin layer manually with excavators before placing a stainless-steel crown) in deeply carious primary molars will increase the success of the original Hall technique (placing stainless steel crown without any intervention to the carious lesion), a randomized study was designed. 268 healthy children between the ages of 3-12 will be recruited from Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry outpatient clinic. Participants who met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate will be randomly allocated to Group 1 (Modified Hall Technique) or Group 2 (Hall Technique). The allocation of patients in each group will be carried out by a random list. The sequence will be generated by a computerized random number generator. Enclosed assignments in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes will be used as allocation concealment mechanism. Group allocation will be performed by an independent researcher, not involved in the study. Clinical and radiographic success of treatments will be determined at follow-up appointments at 3rd, 6th and 12th months by one blinded examiner. In follow-up appointments; treatments will be recorded as "successful" (restoration appears satisfactory, no intervention required/ no clinical signs or symptoms of pulpal pathology/ no pathology visible on radiographs/ tooth exfoliated), "minor failure" (crown perforation/ new caries (around margins)/ restoration loss; tooth restorable/ reversible pulpitis treated without requiring pulpotomy or extraction) or "major failure" (irreversible pulpitis or dental abscess requiring pulpotomy or extraction/ inter-radicular radiolucency/ restoration loss; tooth unrestorable/ internal root resorption).

Conditions

Dental Caries in Children Tooth Diseases Tooth Demineralization Stomatognathic Diseases

Interventions

Hall TechniquePROCEDURE

* Only food scraps or debris will be removed from the caries cavity. * The smallest crown size will be selected that covers all cusps and approaches the contact points with a slight "springback" feel. * If the contact points are tight, orthodontic elastic separators will be placed through the contacts and the SSC will be placed at the second appointment 3-5 days later. * The SSC will be loaded with glass ionomer luting cement and placed evenly on the tooth. * The child will be asked to bite firmly until the crown is pushed down over the tooth. * If the child is unable or unwilling to bite down on the SSC, finger pressure will be used to seat the crown * The child will continue to bite on a cotton roll until the cement hardens * Excess glass ionomer cement will be removed from the crown margins with hand instruments and dental floss.

Modified Hall TechniquePROCEDURE

* Food scraps or debris will be cleaned from the caries cavity and infected soft carious dentin tissue will be excavated with hand instruments. * The smallest crown size will be selected that covers all cusps and approaches the contact points with a slight "springback" feel. * If the contact points are tight, orthodontic elastic separators will be placed through the contacts and the SSC will be placed at the second appointment 3-5 days later. * The SSC will be loaded with glass ionomer luting cement and placed evenly on the tooth. * The child will be asked to bite firmly until the crown is pushed down over the tooth. * If the child is unable or unwilling to bite down on the SSC, finger pressure will be used to seat the crown * The child will continue to bite on a cotton roll until the cement hardens * Excess glass ionomer cement will be removed from the crown margins with hand instruments and dental floss.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 3 YearsMax age: 12 YearsHealthy volunteers:

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * Medically healthy children * Participants attending follow-up appointments * Children having at least one primary molar tooth with deep dentin caries involving occluso proximal surfaces. Tooth inclusion criteria: * Vital pulp with symptom-free or reversible pulpitis * Presence of marginal ridge breakdown and accessible cavity with hand instruments, * Presence of active cavitated carious lesion (Code 3 with Nyvad criteria for caries lesion activity and severity assessment- Nyvad et al., 1999) * Absence of spontaneous or prolonged pain related with irreversible pulpitis * Absence of fistula or abscess near the tooth * Absence of pathological mobility * Absence of pain on percussion * Absence of pulp exposure * Caries lesion located in ½ inner part of dentin radiographically * Presence of sound dentin layer between the deepest part of the carious lesion and the pulp radiographically * Absence of periapical or furcation pathologies on radiographs * Absence of internal and external root resorption on radiographs * More than ½ of root remaining Exclusion Criteria: * Any systemic disease, physical or mental disorder * Children or parents who doesn't accept to participate and sign the informed consent * Clinical or radiographic signs of pulpal or peri-radicular pathology * Caries cavity which cannot be accessible to hand instruments * Physiological root resorption more than 1/2 of the root in primary molars

Locations (1)

Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Faculty of Dentistry

Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Clinical and radiographic success of the treatments

The clinical evaluation will be performed by one blinded examiner with the criteria as proposed by Innes et al. (2007). Outcome criteria for the clinical and radiographic assessment of restorations and teeth will be as follows: Treatments will be considered as "successful" if the restoration appears satisfactory (no intervention required), no clinical signs or symptoms of pulpal pathology, no pathology visible on radiographs or tooth exfoliated The treatments will be classified as "minor failure" if there is a crown perforation, new caries around margins, restoration loss (tooth restorable) and/or reversible pulpitis treated without requiring pulpotomy or extraction. The treatments will be classified as "major failure" if there is irreversible pulpitis or dental abscess requiring pulpotomy or extraction, inter-radicular radiolucency, restoration loss (tooth unrestorable) and/or internal root resorption (Innes et al., 2007).

Time frame: Change from baseline up to 3, 6 and 12 months

Secondary Outcomes

The effect of the amount of marginal ridge fracture on treatment success

The extent of marginal ridge breakdown will be determined by the ratio of the amount of fractured marginal ridge to the total marginal ridge of the tooth and will be scored in 4 groups (\<25%, 25-50%, 50-75%, \>75%) (Cho et al.,2018).

Time frame: Change from baseline up to 3, 6 and 12 months

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.