Articaine Versus Lidocaine Buccal Infiltration

Phase 2UnknownNCT05223075

Fayoum University31 enrolled

Overview

assess the effect of articaine versus lidocaine in only buccal infiltration of local anethesia in lower anterior teeth

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

QUADRUPLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Pain

Interventions

articaine local anethesia with vasoconstrictorDRUG

buccal infiltration only of articaine local anethesia during extraction of lower anterior teeth

lidocaine local anethesia with vasoconstrictorDRUG

buccal infiltration only of lidocaine local anethesia during extraction of lower anterior teeth

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * medically stable * 18years or older * patient with bilateral lower anterior teeth requiring non surgical removal Exclusion Criteria: * grade 3 mobility * neurological disease * allergy to anethesia

Locations (1)

Fayoum University

Al Fayyum, Egypt

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

pain during extraction

by (VAS) visual analouge scale

Time frame: during extraction

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.