The goal of this real world efficacy study is to understand the benefit of universal social needs screening, community-based service referrals, and telephonic follow-up as a scalable strategy for preventing COVID-19 transmission, and for addressing the secondary health effects of the social, behavioral, and economic changes following the COVID-19 pandemic. With statewide community service providers, existing health information technology, and piloted methods, we seek to determine the effectiveness of universal social needs screening and community service referrals - the SINCERE intervention - in improving health outcomes of COVID-19 vulnerable and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations and whether intensive follow-up and collaborative goal-setting helps overcome barriers to community service use by patients seen in the emergency department and seeking COVID testing at community-based and mobile clinic locations.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
466
Each goal setting session will involve templated prompts in 211's ServicePoint to guide the creation of a patient-centered "action plan" specifying what, when, how much, and how often patients will engage in a behavior (e.g., "I will work on filling out eligibility paperwork for 30 minutes on Wednesday evening"). Again, following clear prompts, ISs negotiate the "action plan" with patients until patients can rate their level of confidence for achieving this behavior a 7 on a scale from 0 to 10.
Adding to the standard Call + Resources protocol, those assigned to scheduled follow-up will receive a proactive call from 211 every 2 weeks for 3 months to explore additional service needs. These calls will be unstructured, guided by participant requests and 211 IS prompts.
211 ISs contact referred patients, provide referral services, and follow up in an ad-hoc manner.
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Change in Global Health over 12-week time period
Standardized PROMIS v1.2 Global Health. 10 questions create one outcome score. Each question is on a 1-5 scale with higher numbers indicating lower severity. The outcome variable will be PROMIS v1.2 Global Health with Time included as a variable in the model.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-week, 4-week and 12-week surveys
Change in Depression over 12-week time period
Standardized PROMIS Depression - Short Form 8b. 8 questions create one outcome score. Each question is on a 1-5 scale with higher numbers indicating higher severity. The outcome variable will be PROMIS Anxiety with Time included as a variable in the model.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-week, 4-week and 12-week surveys
Change in Anxiety over 12-week time period
Standardized PROMIS Anxiety- Short Form 7a. 7 questions create one outcome score. Each question is on a 1-5 scale with higher numbers indicating higher severity. The outcome variable will be PROMIS Anxiety with Time included as a variable in the model.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-week, 4-week and 12-week surveys
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.