The ReCySOHT study is a multicenter, retrospective, observational case-control study on the risk factors for developing a ganciclovir-resistant/refractory (GCV-RR) cytomegalovirus infection in patients receiving solid organ transplant (SOT) or hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Aims of the study are to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for GCV-RR CMV infection in SOT recipients and HSCT patients in order to design further studies aimed at preventing and improving the patient management of GCV-RR CMV infections.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant (SOT) patients and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients. Ganciclovir (GCV) is the first line therapy for treatment and prevention of CMV infection in SOT and HSCT recipients, with established efficacy and relatively safe profile. Ganciclovir-resistant or refractory (GCV-RR) CMV is an uncommon but frightening clinical problem due to limited, toxic and less effective therapeutic alternative drugs. Indeed, some studies indicate that GCV-RR is associated with significant additional attributable morbidity and mortality in SOT and HSCT recipients compared with ganciclovir susceptible (GCV-S) CMV disease. Few data are available about the incidence of GCV-RR-CMV in SOT and HSCT patients showing a range from 0% to 3% . The serological mismatch group and the type of SOT have been reported as the main factors influencing such range. Indeed, in one of the largest experience now available in SOT, the incidence of GCV-resistant (GCV-RT) CMV infection accounted up to 12% in a cohort of lung transplant recipients. Among HSCT patients, haploidentical, allogeneic unrelated, and cord blood HSCT have been associated with increased risk of GCV-RR CMV infection. Among risk factors for GCV-RR, high-risk D/R subset (R- in SOT and R+ in HSCT), high viral loads, inadequate drug delivery, increased durations of antiviral drug exposure and the use of more potent immunosuppressive regimens have been reported. However, these reports come from small, monocentric experiences with a limited number of cases, providing a fragmentary picture of the overall burden and epidemiological characteristics of GCV-RR in transplant patients. Information of the epidemiological background of GCV-RR after transplantation could be helpful in improving preventive management and reducing the emergence of GCV-RT episodes. Indeed, studies investigating viral genetic alterations showed that mutations conferring ganciclovir resistance are not present at baseline but emerge and become amplified over time, especially in the presence of an incompletely suppressive drug exposure. The GCV-RT is due to mutations in UL97 and UL54 genes. UL97 mutations confer various degrees of phenotypic resistance to ganciclovir. Mutations in UL54 determine higher-level resistance to ganciclovir and usually appear as a second step after mutations in UL97. The investigators carry-out a multicenter retrospective observational study to define incidence of GCV-RR CMV-infection in SOT and HSCT patients and to identify the risk factors for its development in SOT and HSCT recipients. Data from this study could be useful to design further studies aimed at preventing and improving the patient management of GCV-RR CMV infections.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
100
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGInstitut Jules Bordet
Brussels, Belgium
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGUniversity Hospitals Leuven
Leuven, Belgium
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGHelsinki University Central Hospital
Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges
Limoges, Limoges, France
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Bologna, Bologna, Italy
RECRUITINGHumanitas Research Hospital
Rozzano, Milano, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGIstituto mediterraneo per i trapianti e terapie ad alta specializzazione (ISMETT)
Palermo, Palermo, Italy
RECRUITINGOspedale San Martino
Genova, Italy
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGPoliclinico di Milano
Milan, Italy
RECRUITING...and 13 more locations
To define incidence of GCV-RR CMV-infection in SOT and HSCT patients
To define incidence of GCV-RR CMV-infection in SOT and HSCT patients
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
To define the risk factors for GCV-RR CMV-infection development in SOT and HSCT patients
To define the risk factors for GCV-RR CMV-infection development in SOT and HSCT patients
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
To compare type of CMV episode between SOT and HSCT patients with GCV-RR versus GCV-S CMV-infection
To compare type of CMV episode: infection or disease (the last cathegorized as CMV syndrome or Tissue invasion) between SOT and HSCT patients with GCV-RR versus GCV-S CMV-infection
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
To compare virological cure between SOT and HSCT patients with GCV-RR versus GCV-S CMV-infection
To compare virological cure at 30, 60 and 90 days after CMV infection diagnosis and relapse of CMV infection between SOT and HSCT patients with GCV-RR versus GCV-S CMV-infection
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
To compare clinical cure between SOT and HSCT patients with GCV-RR versus GCV-S CMV-infection
To compare clinical cure at 30, 60 and 90 days after CMV infection diagnosis between SOT and HSCT patients with GCV-RR versus GCV-S CMV-infection
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
To compare graft outcome between SOT and HSCT patients with GCV-RR versus GCV-S CMV-infection
To compare graft failure rate and the need of re-transplant between SOT and HSCT patients with GCV-RR versus GCV-S CMV-infection
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
To compare the need of ICU and hospital stay between SOT and HSCT patients with GCV-RR versus GCV-S CMV-infection
To compare total length of ICU and hospital stay between SOT and HSCT patients with GCV-RR versus GCV-S CMV-infection
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
To compare the need of readmission in ICU and/or hospital between SOT and HSCT patients with GCV-RR versus GCV-S CMV-infection
To compare the need of readmission in ICU and/or hospital between SOT and HSCT patients with GCV-RR versus GCV-S CMV-infection
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
To compare all-cause mortality between SOT and HSCT patients with GCV-RR versus GCV-S CMV-infection
To compare all-cause mortality during infection episode and follow-up (30, 60, 90 days after the first CMV infection diagnosis) between SOT and HSCT patients with GCV-RR versus GCV-S CMV-infection
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
To describe the therapeutic management of GCV-RR CMV-infection
To describe the therapeutic management of GCV-RR CMV-infection including the use of CMV-specific T-cell assay
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.