This clinical trial estimates the abuse liability of nicotine pouches with varying nicotine concentrations relative to cigarette smoking in Appalachian, Ohio and Ohio smokers. Nicotine pouches are a novel tobacco product with potential to reduce or increase the harm of tobacco use. Evaluating nicotine pouches abuse liability among smokers in Ohio including the unique demographic of Appalachia may clarify the public health effect of NPs in Appalachian Ohio and across Ohio. Results may inform public health efforts, policy, and clinical care aimed at reducing tobacco-related disparities.
Aim 1: PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To estimate the abuse liability of nicotine pouches (NPs) with varying nicotine concentrations relative to cigarette smoking. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: I. To clarify the public health effect of NPs in Appalachian Ohio. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate the abuse liability of NPs with varying nicotine concentrations relative to cigarette smoking by measuring nicotine pharmacokinetics. II. To estimate the abuse liability of NPs with varying nicotine concentrations relative to cigarette smoking by measuring subjective effects. III. To estimate the abuse liability of NPs with varying nicotine concentrations relative to cigarette smoking by measuring intentions to use and switch to NPs. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 arms. ARM I: Patients receive lower dose nicotine pouch orally (PO) over 30 minutes at visits 1, 2, and 3. ARM II: Patients receive higher dose nicotine pouch PO over 30 minutes at visits 1, 2, and 3. ARM III: Patients smoke usual brand of cigarettes, taking one puff every 30 seconds over 5 minutes at visits 1, 2, and 3. Aim 2: PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To understand the pharmacokinetic difference between tobacco-derived and synthetic NPs. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: I. To clarify the public health effect of NPs on adult smokers EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To understand the differences in abuse liability between tobacco-derived and synthetic NPs by measuring nicotine pharmacokinetics. II. To understand the differences in abuse liability between tobacco-derived and synthetic NPs by measuring subjective effects. III. To estimate the abuse liability of tobacco-derived vs. synthetic NPs by measuring intentions to use and switch to NPs. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 arms. ARM I: Patients receive a 3mg dose nicotine pouch orally (PO) over 30 minutes at visits 1, 2, and 3. ARM II: Patients receive a 3mg dose nicotine pouch PO over 30 minutes at visits 1, 2, and 3. ARM III: Patients receive a 3mg dose nicotine pouch PO over 30 minutes at visits 1, 2, and 3.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
55
Smoke preferred brand of cigarette
Given lower dose nicotine pouch
Given higher dose nicotine pouch
Ancillary studies
Given 3mg nicotine pouch (Aim 2)
Given 3mg nicotine pouch (Aim 2)
Given 3mg nicotine pouch (Aim 2)
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Evaluate plasma nicotine concentration at t=30 minutes for each product.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Aim 1: Public health effect of NPs in Appalachian Ohio - if NPs can be used as a substitute for cigarette smoking
Data collected will show if NPs are a viable substitute for cigarette smoking.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Evaluate plasma nicotine concentrations at t=5 through t=90 minutes
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Evaluate withdrawal relief at t=5 through t=90 minutes
We measure withdrawal relief using the Minnesota Withdrawal Scale (MNWS). We administer this questionnaire at each timepoint along the standardized scale of t=0, t=5, t=15, t=30, t=60 and t=90. The MNWS includes a minimum value of "none" and a maximum value or "severe." The higher scores indicate increased withdrawal symptoms and lower scores indicate lessened or no withdrawal symptoms.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Evaluate product appeal across all 3 products
Product appeal will be assessed using several scales, including the Modified E-Cigarette Smoking Questionnaire (mCEQ), the Product Evaluation Scale (PES), the Adapted Drug Effects Liking Scale, and the Study Product Effects Liking Scale which are administered after the final timepoint of each study visit. For both the mCEQ and PES, the minimum scale value is "not at all" and the maximum scale value is "extremely." Higher scores can mean both better or worse depending on the question. Ex: "Was using your smokeless tobacco satisfying?" and "Did using your smokeless tobacco make you nauseous?" are both questions on each scale, so a higher score would vary in meaning based on the question. For the Adapted Drug Effects Liking and Study Product Effects Liking scales, minimum values include "not at all" and maximum value includes "very pleasant." With the exception of one question on the Study Product Effects Liking Scale, a higher score indicates increased enjoyment of the product.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.