ACT With Feedback for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

Overview

The purpose of this study is to explore the efficacy of Attention Control Training with the inclusion of feedback for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). It seems that the most efficient ABMT method to balance attention bias variability (ABV) among individuals with PTSD is Attention Control Training (ACT). This type of training is designed to balance attention allocation towards threat-related and neutral stimuli. A few studies have further shown that this training type succeeds in balancing the aberrant fluctuations in attention bias observed in patients with PTSD, and that this leads to a reduction in PTSD symptoms (Badura-Brack et al., 2015). The purpose of the current study is to examine the efficacy of ACT that also includes feedback. Specifically, we intend to test whether the inclusion of feedback on top of standard ACT may enhance training efficacy in reducing ABV and in reducing PTSD symptoms.

The aim of the current study is to explore the efficacy of Attention Control Training with the inclusion of feedback for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Individuals with PTSD exhibit increased threat-related attention bias variability (ABV; Lacoviello et al., 2014; Naim et al., 2015). Based on these findings, computerized training methods aimed to modify the attention bias were developed (Attention Bias Modification Training; ABMT). It seems that the most efficient ABMT method to balance ABV among individuals with PTSD is Attention Control Training (ACT). This type of training is designed to balance attention allocation towards threat-related and neutral stimuli. A few studies have further shown that this training type succeeds in balancing the aberrant fluctuations in attention bias observed in PTSD, and that this leads to a reduction in PTSD symptoms (Badura-Brack et al., 2015). The purpose of the current study is to examine the efficacy of ACT that also includes a feedback component. Specifically, we intend to test whether the inclusion of feedback on top of standard ACT may enhance training efficacy in reducing ABV and in reducing PTSD symptoms. For this purpose, we will recruit 60 IDF veterans diagnosed with PTSD that will be randomly assigned to one of two conditions: ACT with feedback or ACT with yoked sham feedback. We expect that ACT with feedback will produce greater reduction in PTSD symptoms and in ABV relative to ACT with yoked sham feedback.