The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability (e.g., enrollment, adherence, retention, acceptability of procedures and interventions) of a pilot factorial study design that will help elucidate components of mind-body exercise interventions. The study involves completing a walking program, a mindful attention program, a walking program that includes mindful attention, or no program at all. A "pilot" study is a smaller study that helps researchers to understand whether the study design can be carried out and what participants think about the study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
34
Participants will listen to mindful attention audio recordings via headphones
Participants will complete a moderate-intensity walking program
Participants will complete a moderate-intensity walking program while listening to mindful attention audio recordings via headphones
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Feasibility of screening: screened to eligible ratio
percent of screened individuals that were determined eligible for the study
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Feasibility of enrollment: eligible to enrollment ratio
percent of eligible individuals that enroll in the study; determined to be feasible if greater than or equal to 70% of eligible patients enroll
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Feasibility of retention: retention at each assessment
percent of enrolled participants retained at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up; determined to be feasible if greater than or equal to 70% retention at each assessment
Time frame: 6 months
Feasibility of interventions: attendance rates for each session
percent session attendance; determined to be feasible if participants attend greater than or equal to 75% of sessions
Time frame: 6 months
Feasibility of survey completion: survey completion rates at each assessment
percent of participants that complete surveys at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Time frame: 6 months
Acceptability of interventions
Acceptability of the interventions will be assessed via overall satisfaction (1 = not at all to 10 = very much); determined to be acceptable if mean rating is greater than or equal to 7.5 across 80% of sessions
Time frame: 6 months
Acceptability of study design
Acceptability of the study design will be assessed via acceptability of study procedures (1= not at all to 10 = very much); determined to be acceptable if mean rating is greater than or equal to 7.5 across 80% of sessions
Time frame: 6 months
Perspectives on study interventions
Perspectives on study interventions will be assessed via exit interview
Time frame: Post-intervention (after 8 week intervention)
Ventilatory efficiency
Assessed via a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test, using expired gas analysis under continuous electrocardiographic monitoring.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention)
Heart rate dynamics
Assessed via 24-hour heart rate monitoring
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention)
Positive affect
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, a validated self-report measure, used to assess levels of positive affect. The positive affect subscale is made up of 10 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores range from 10 to 50 with higher scores indicating greater levels of positive affect
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention), 3 months post-intervention
Emotion regulation
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, a 36-item validated self-report measure, used to assess difficulties with emotion regulation; items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, total scores range from 36 to 180, with higher scores reflecting greater emotion regulation difficulties. 6 subscale scores with higher scores reflecting greater emotion regulation difficulties.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention), 3 months post-intervention
Interoceptive awareness
Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Scale, a 32-item validated self-report measures, used to assess levels of interoceptive awareness; items are rated on a 6-point Likert scale, total scores range from 0 to 160, with higher scores reflecting greater interoceptive awareness. 8 subscales with higher scores reflecting greater interocpetive awareness
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention), 3 months post-intervention
Self-efficacy
Multidimensional Self-Efficacy Scale, a 9-item validated self-report measure, used to assess levels of self-efficacy; scores range from 0-90 with higher scores reflecting greater self-efficacy
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention), 3 months post-intervention
Self-reported physical activity
International Physical Activity Questionnaire, a validated self-report measure, used to assess levels of physical activity; walking MET mins/week, moderate MET mins/week and vigorous MET mins/week are calculated
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention), 3 months post-intervention
Objective physical activity
7 day activity monitoring (via ActiGraph monitor) to assess minutes per week in moderate-intensity exercise
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (after 8 week intervention)
In-session oxygen consumption
Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (via standard metabolic cart)
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 8
In-session ventilatory efficiency
Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (via standard metabolic cart)
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 8
In-session respiration rate
Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (via standard metabolic cart)
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 8
In-session heart rate
Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (via standard metabolic cart)
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 8